Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 150 of 529
  1. #101
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    113

    Devinci Atlas Carbon

    ...
    Last edited by Nilsern; 05-10-2013 at 03:12 AM.

  2. #102
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    56
    How do you find the seating position on the Atlas given the slack seat angle? Especially those of you who put a longer fork in it.
    I'm also interested in the Atlas (aluminum model), but I'm a afraid that it might be uncomfortable for longer rides and steep climbes. Don't like travel-adjust forks so 120 would be the most interesting option. But this still leads to a 71° seat angle, which is way slacker than my current bikes.

  3. #103
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    200
    How would I go about reducing the travel of the stock revelation to 120 mm?

  4. #104
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    200
    So after a couple of rides on my stock carbon RSX, today I flipped the chip into the "high" position. Wow that is so much better for the climbs. I'm wondering if I can replicate the steeper seat angle but keep the lower bb height and slacker head angle of the low position by shortening the fork travel down to 120 and using an angleset?

  5. #105
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    200
    Quote Originally Posted by madtrix View Post
    How do you find the seating position on the Atlas given the slack seat angle? Especially those of you who put a longer fork in it.
    I'm also interested in the Atlas (aluminum model), but I'm a afraid that it might be uncomfortable for longer rides and steep climbes. Don't like travel-adjust forks so 120 would be the most interesting option. But this still leads to a 71° seat angle, which is way slacker than my current bikes.
    With 140 mm and in the low position, the slack seat angle really sucks on climbs.

  6. #106
    Monkey Wrench
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by _tom_ View Post
    With 140 mm and in the low position, the slack seat angle really sucks on climbs.
    I'd disagree... It's not a racer at that point, but for the DH capability of the bike, it climbs quite well with 140mm in low position. I want that low BB so I can carve the DH and flats, and keep the front end as slack as possible.
    I think it's all about what you want and expect out of the bike - and the beauty of it is that it has a huge amount of flexibility to accommodate a variety of riding styles.
    Let me fix your bike @ ordinarybicycle.net in Louisville, CO

  7. #107
    Monkey Wrench
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    351
    You'll need a different size Solo Air Spring. See the tech doc from RockShox

    http://cdn.sram.com/cdn/farfuture/Vz...ice_manual.pdf
    Let me fix your bike @ ordinarybicycle.net in Louisville, CO

  8. #108
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    822
    Quote Originally Posted by madtrix View Post
    How do you find the seating position on the Atlas given the slack seat angle? Especially those of you who put a longer fork in it.
    I'm also interested in the Atlas (aluminum model), but I'm a afraid that it might be uncomfortable for longer rides and steep climbes. Don't like travel-adjust forks so 120 would be the most interesting option. But this still leads to a 71° seat angle, which is way slacker than my current bikes.
    Keep in mind that the seat angle on the Devinci website is 'virtual'. It's the angle that you would get from a straight line through the BB centre and a point on the seat tube at the height of the top headset cover. As you can see, the seat tube is far from straight. After the bend, it moves backward at a much slacker angle.

    This means that your seat placement gets a bit critical if the tip of your saddle sits relatively high up, but also not far behind the BB. You might end up with your saddle way forward on the seat clamp. It might even be impossible to mount it at the position of your current bike. Sure, you can alter your seating position and rotate yourself backwards on the bike so to speak, but that indeed could be uncomfortable and hurt climbing.

    That said, it all depends on your leg proportions and thus where you want your seat to be. Mine is at 76cm from the BB centre to a point 12cm from the rear of the saddle. The tip of the saddle is about 10cm behind the BB. My seatpost clamp is centered on the seat rails. The seatpost is a Rock Shox Reverb, which has no setback. I ride a Large Atlas with 120mm White Brothers Loop fork.

    I have done lots of techy, really steep climbing this week and the Atlas did a great job.

  9. #109
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    23

    Atlas carbon vs jet 9 rdo

    Hey Billy Davis, I wanted to ask you what you like (and don't like) about the Atlas carbon since you've had plenty of ride time on it. I have been following this tread to help me in my choice of club rides/race frames, and I am leaning more towards the Devinci, with the jet 9 rdo being the other choice. Any thoughts or opinons on all this? Any input would be a help.
    Thanks, RT

  10. #110
    Monkey Wrench
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Thompson View Post
    Hey Billy Davis, I wanted to ask you what you like (and don't like) about the Atlas carbon since you've had plenty of ride time on it. I have been following this tread to help me in my choice of club rides/race frames, and I am leaning more towards the Devinci, with the jet 9 rdo being the other choice. Any thoughts or opinons on all this? Any input would be a help.
    Thanks, RT
    I just built an Atlas Carbon for a customer as a race/fast trail bike. It has an XX1 drivetrain, XT brakes, Crest wheels, and a 100mm SID, weighing in at 24.6lbs. He is blown away at the speed of the bike and how plush it feels for a race-worthy rig. He said that it feels almost like a hardtail in pedaling efficiency but let him rally his XC downhills as fast as his Pivot 5.7 (with 150mm fork).

    I like Niner, but I'd say that the Split Pivot feels much more direct in your pedal stroke, making it the better race option. Weights are similar, and the robust nature of the frame gives me lots of confidence (and mine is built up as a trail bike w/140mm).
    Devinci Atlas Carbon-2013-05-11-12.09.49.jpg
    Let me fix your bike @ ordinarybicycle.net in Louisville, CO

  11. #111
    Monkey Wrench
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    351
    Hey guys - I found a use for the direct mount on a 1x11 Atlas...

    Wisecracker bottle opener held on with a Devinci headset cap:
    Devinci Atlas Carbon-2013-05-11-14.31.31.jpg
    Let me fix your bike @ ordinarybicycle.net in Louisville, CO

  12. #112
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    23
    Wow, that is sweet looking. I am going build one very close to that, except I was considering a reba fork. I would like to know what you think of a SID vs a reba (flex, smoothness of the ride, etc.) I was on the fence between a xx or xo build, but this looks too good and is probably lighter.
    Thanks, RT

  13. #113
    Monkey Wrench
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Thompson View Post
    Wow, that is sweet looking. I am going build one very close to that, except I was considering a reba fork. I would like to know what you think of a SID vs a reba (flex, smoothness of the ride, etc.) I was on the fence between a xx or xo build, but this looks too good and is probably lighter.
    Thanks, RT
    The current SID is a good deal lighter than the Reba, and every one that I've ridden has been very nicely controlled (damping knobs actually work as you expect) and have been very smooth from the box. Current Rebas have been a little less consistent, but still better than Fox products that I've been around. I'd say if you're building a bike with 120mm or less, go with SID. If you need more, get a White Bros Loop, check out the new X-Fusions, or wait a little bit for a Pike.
    If you need help building up that Atlas, PM me...I can help make that happen.
    Let me fix your bike @ ordinarybicycle.net in Louisville, CO

  14. #114
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    23
    I love the setup. Can beer lubricate the chain AND you?!?

  15. #115
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Billy Davis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    44

    Carbon Atlas update

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Thompson View Post
    Hey Billy Davis, I wanted to ask you what you like (and don't like) about the Atlas carbon since you've had plenty of ride time on it. I have been following this tread to help me in my choice of club rides/race frames, and I am leaning more towards the Devinci, with the jet 9 rdo being the other choice. Any thoughts or opinons on all this? Any input would be a help.
    Thanks, RT
    Robert I am loving every minute on the Devinci. I ended up with 100mm stem with the seat mid position. Feels spot on fit wise vs my Scott Spark large. I'm blown away with how fun the bike is. Just rode brown county and just cant keep the wheels on the ground!

    Specifically vs the Niner, nothing wrong at all with the Niner its a really nice rig, but the Niner is quite a bit longer and much more difficult to manual and feels less playful. In addition the split pivot is really compliant and fun/fast at the same time.

    Biggest nit pick I can make so far is too much over steer especially compared to my Scott Spark. I plan on switching from 100mm to 120mm fork soon to tame the steering a bit. If you like a quick steering rig then go with the 100mm IMO.

  16. #116
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    23

    Billy Davis

    Quote Originally Posted by Billy Davis View Post
    Robert I am loving every minute on the Devinci. I ended up with 100mm stem with the seat mid position. Feels spot on fit wise vs my Scott Spark large. I'm blown away with how fun the bike is. Just rode brown county and just cant keep the wheels on the ground!

    Specifically vs the Niner, nothing wrong at all with the Niner its a really nice rig, but the Niner is quite a bit longer and much more difficult to manual and feels less playful. In addition the split pivot is really compliant and fun/fast at the same time.

    Biggest nit pick I can make so far is too much over steer especially compared to my Scott Spark. I plan on switching from 100mm to 120mm fork soon to tame the steering a bit. If you like a quick steering rig then go with the 100mm IMO.
    Billy Davis, what position is the chip in? Putting it in the low position should slow down your steering, unless you want to tame it down more. For me, I'm in Florida, and lot of our trails are tight and twisty, so quickness is needed unless you like eating tree bark!
    I am still undecided on forks; a SID, a reba, a Fox, or a WB loop. The lightest would be the SID and I'm leaning towards that, but will it work as well? Any suggestions?
    Thanks, RT

  17. #117
    Off the saddle
    Reputation: jizzim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    211
    vwvoodoo, what size (q-factor and length) XX1 crankset did you install on that Atlas?

  18. #118
    Monkey Wrench
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by jizzim View Post
    vwvoodoo, what size (q-factor and length) XX1 crankset did you install on that Atlas?
    168Q
    175mm arm length
    Let me fix your bike @ ordinarybicycle.net in Louisville, CO

  19. #119
    Off the saddle
    Reputation: jizzim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    211
    Thanks for the info. Due to budgetary reasons I'm really looking at the Atlas Carbon frameset. I had a few other frames high on the list but this is making it's way quickly.

  20. #120
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    176
    Anyone care to comment on downhill chunkfest capabilities? I know it only has 110mm travel but paired with a 140 fork what can she handle? Coming from a 6" travel 29er i'm used to plowing everything but dying on the climbs, looking for a bike that i can ride long distance, still eat up chunk, and just have plain ol fun on!

  21. #121
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    16
    right - I am thinking of changing my current bike (Yeti ASR5) for one of these


    Please someone - put me off!!

  22. #122
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    822
    @confused and charliemort, I have the same comment on you both: I'd advise to try out an Atlas or at least a bike with similar travel / wheelsize. A Specialized Camber or Giant Anthem 29er for example, if you can get test bikes with at least 120mm front travel. These got way different geometries to the Atlas, but similar amounts of rear travel.

    I am very happy with my Atlas in 120/110 config in the downhills, but it's very hard to judge how much the chunck absorption qualities are impaired. For sure, I have the feeling my fork is the biggest constraint to improve downhill speed (apart from my own skills), but 1.5" less rear travel seems like a lot. So, there should be a difference, but wether it's too much to give up for easier climbing, only you can decide.

    Same with the ASR5. My experience is that a 29" FS can get away with less travel and still feel as capable as a 26" with 2-3" more travel. The difference is subtile though and highly dependant on the rider. A friend of mine rides a 26" RM Element with the amount of travel of the ASR5. It's a playful bike and he's plenty fast on it. So, same thing... I think only a test ride on a 100-110ish travel 29" FS will tell you if the improvement is there and worth it.

    If it is, I can fully recommend the Atlas Carbon.
    Last edited by JeroenK; 05-31-2013 at 03:03 AM.

  23. #123
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    16
    Any recommendations for an ideal placement of the adhesive downtube protector?

    Placing it close to the BB would cover the serial number plate, so that doesn't seem like a good idea. So where should it go? Should the bottom edge of the protector mount below the serial number plate, just above it, or above the red Devinci logo where the grey paint strip begins?

    It would be great to hear where some of you have chosen to mount the protector. Also, has anyone found a better protector than the one provided by Devinci? Thanks!

    Devinci Atlas Carbon-img_6234.jpg

  24. #124
    Off the saddle
    Reputation: jizzim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    211
    I posted this on the General Discussion forum but it's worth checking out. It's from 3M and is made for cars. It sprays on as a liquid, i.e. easy to apply, and dries as a peelable film. It's clear as well so it won't cover up any decals.
    3M Auto: Products for People Who Love Cars

    Edit to add: With that said, no one knows if it'll lift decals that are not clearcoated over when you go to peel it off.

  25. #125
    Monkey Wrench
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadow Wolf View Post
    Any recommendations for an ideal placement of the adhesive downtube protector?

    Placing it close to the BB would cover the serial number plate, so that doesn't seem like a good idea. So where should it go? Should the bottom edge of the protector mount below the serial number plate, just above it, or above the red Devinci logo where the grey paint strip begins?

    It would be great to hear where some of you have chosen to mount the protector. Also, has anyone found a better protector than the one provided by Devinci? Thanks!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6234.jpg 
Views:	949 
Size:	119.9 KB 
ID:	804348
    The carbon around the BB junction is pretty thick, so I went a little higher on mine - just above the Devinci label. On a few customer's bikes I went a little lower, covering the devinci symbol.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Devinci Atlas Carbon-2013-05-31-07.25.34.jpg  

    Devinci Atlas Carbon-2013-05-27-13.06.00.jpg  

    Devinci Atlas Carbon-2013-05-24-18.22.13.jpg  

    Let me fix your bike @ ordinarybicycle.net in Louisville, CO

  26. #126
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    56
    Wow, those look great. The left one has a 100mm fork and the right one 140? What sizes are they?

    Does anybody know if there are really no geometry changes between the aluminum and carbon atlas? Devinci says this, however on their geo charts the carbon has a 1cm longer top tube and wheelbase, but the reach is the same?

  27. #127
    Monkey Wrench
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by madtrix View Post
    Wow, those look great. The left one has a 100mm fork and the right one 140? What sizes are they?

    Does anybody know if there are really no geometry changes between the aluminum and carbon atlas? Devinci says this, however on their geo charts the carbon has a 1cm longer top tube and wheelbase, but the reach is the same?
    140mm medium on the right. 120mm small on the left. Both bikes did The Whole Enchilada in Moab, Palisade, Fruita Kokopelli loops, and Eagle trails last weekend... Lots of fun!

    Geo is definitely different - they generally run a little bigger than traditional sizing on the carbon, closer to traditional sizing on the alloy.

    As far as chunk goes, the 140 definitely does better - I rode as fast on UPS and LPS trails in Moab on this as I did on my much longer Sultan DW last fall. And on the upper Hazard County trail (with super fast swoopy turns, jump, and LOTS of embedded broken baby heads) it went much faster than the Sultan with it's shorter chainstays and better acceleration.
    Let me fix your bike @ ordinarybicycle.net in Louisville, CO

  28. #128
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    35
    Possibly going to be purchasing a Atlas Carbon RC, went to my LBS that sells Devinci and had a great hour and half talk with the owner about my options with components. Looking to go full Shimano XT will a 38/24 crank and 11-36 cassette. He is going to call his bike reps and see what kind of pricing I can get this for, gotta say I am extremely excited. Just a sweet bike

  29. #129
    Off the saddle
    Reputation: jizzim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    211
    I've been keeping up with this thread and after reading, it seems like the 120mm fork would make the Atlas Carbon into a well rounded and balanced trail bike. I live in Texas and our trails are nothing like Moab. My current bike has a 120mm fork and 135mm rear and I have yet to bottom both out even with my geared riding weight of 235#. Quite frankly I think it's way more travel than I need on the trails that I ride.
    Ultimately I would like to make a trip to Moab and other trail systems. With that said, would you guys whole heartedly recommend a 120mm fork for "one size generally does all"?
    The Whole Enchilada is on the top of my list to ride either before the year is over or sometime next..

  30. #130
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    822
    Quote Originally Posted by jizzim View Post
    With that said, would you guys whole heartedly recommend a 120mm fork for "one size generally does all"?
    Can't speak for the rest of us, but for me 120mm works great. I do endurance races, but not the semi-road race like ones, but as technically demanding as possible. We have a few gems here in Europe, particulary in France and I'm allways on the lookout for more.

    For that, which really is riding difficult uphill/downhill trails in a race that lasts for more than 4 hours, my Atlas Carbon setup is ideal. With a 100mm fork, I suspect the low BB height would give me trouble and the slightly more slacked out 120mm fork gives me a bit more straight line stability without hurting tight turns too much. A 140mm fork would make this bike ideal for mostly downhill/ shuttle/bike park rides, but that would hurt climbing too much for me.

  31. #131
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by jizzim View Post
    I posted this on the General Discussion forum but it's worth checking out. It's from 3M and is made for cars. It sprays on as a liquid, i.e. easy to apply, and dries as a peelable film. It's clear as well so it won't cover up any decals.
    3M Auto: Products for People Who Love Cars
    That's an amazing product. I've never seen anything like that before. Thanks for posting

  32. #132
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Unkown View Post
    Possibly going to be purchasing a Atlas Carbon RC, went to my LBS that sells Devinci and had a great hour and half talk with the owner about my options with components. Looking to go full Shimano XT will a 38/24 crank and 11-36 cassette. He is going to call his bike reps and see what kind of pricing I can get this for, gotta say I am extremely excited. Just a sweet bike
    The RC is kitted with SRAM/Formula components. The 140mm RXS is a Shimano build but with SLX components. Either way you'd be replacing virtually everything to go full XT. It sounds like picking up a frame and spec'ing your own build out would be the way to go.

  33. #133
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by vwvoodoo View Post
    The carbon around the BB junction is pretty thick, so I went a little higher on mine - just above the Devinci label. On a few customer's bikes I went a little lower, covering the devinci symbol.
    Those are the two placement areas that I'm trying to decide between, but I've not committed yet. I really like the Devinci emblem, but it's not in a well thought out spot. Even if it's not covered with the protector you still can't see it when the bike's upright. IMO it should have been placed high on the underside of the down tube, where I think it would have looked good.

    Great pics of the bikes! Gorgeous scenery. Man I'd really like to make the trek out to Moab this summer. Might be a little bit of a sketchier ride for me with my 100mm Atlas though.

  34. #134
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadow Wolf View Post
    The RC is kitted with SRAM/Formula components. The 140mm RXS is a Shimano build but with SLX components. Either way you'd be replacing virtually everything to go full XT. It sounds like picking up a frame and spec'ing your own build out would be the way to go.
    Yup that is what we are doing, currently the owner at the LBS where I am getting mine is building up his own Atlas 29er RC, with full XX1 components. Its a new bike shop and he hasn't had to many people come in asking for carbon Devinci's, so he was pretty excited to hear that I was really interested and is going to shave the price down here and there. Going with the 110mm travel in the front, best option for the riding I do.

  35. #135
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    432
    Quote Originally Posted by madtrix View Post

    Does anybody know if there are really no geometry changes between the aluminum and carbon atlas? Devinci says this, however on their geo charts the carbon has a 1cm longer top tube and wheelbase, but the reach is the same?
    I emailed Devinci about this myself and they confirmed that the carbon version does have different geometry, mainly longer top tubes.

  36. #136
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by 12snap View Post
    I emailed Devinci about this myself and they confirmed that the carbon version does have different geometry, mainly longer top tubes.
    I learned this the hard way with my own trail and error. Before Devinci added the "sizing" column to the geometry specs, I contacted them directly and provided them with my height, etc. They recommended a large frame so I took that as gospel and that's what I went with. It ended up being ridiculously big for me, so I exchanged it for a medium, which fits well and I'm happy with it. Even the medium is substantial and doesn't feel small at all.

    In an effort to try to understand why the large was so, well... large, I compared the geometry of it to similar bikes from other manufacturers. As it turns out, the 633mm (~25") VTT of a large Atlas Carbon is equivalent to everyone else's XL carbon frames, and in some cases XXL. Case solved! The same is true for all three sizes of the Atlas Carbon. The medium, for instance, is equivalent to a large carbon frame from most other manufacturers.

  37. #137
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    56
    Ok. I got the answer that the geometry is the same.
    Hmm, difficult for me now, because I think the medium carbon Atlas would fit me (at 5'9") quite well, but the aluminium might be a little short. Yes the top top is quite long cause of the slack seat angle, but if I compare the reach against my current bikes or bikes of other brands it quite short.

  38. #138
    get down!
    Reputation: appleSSeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,183
    I'm happy they went to a longer top tube, the aluminum frames were way too small in my opinion. Looking at grabbing a large when I have my $$ right. Digging this frame. What's the actual chain stay length of the carbons if anyone could check for me.

    Thanks!
    Rudy Projects look ridiculous

    visit my blog, BEATS, BIKES & LIFE

  39. #139
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    822
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadow Wolf View Post
    As it turns out, the 633mm (~25") VTT of a large Atlas Carbon is equivalent to everyone else's XL carbon frames, and in some cases XXL. Case solved!
    Well, not quite. The effective top tube is kind of a disturbing measurement, because of the slack seating angle. The reach (the length of the bike in front of the BB) is the same as a Large Gary Fisher Superfly, which is a normal-ish reach measurement for size Large bikes.

    So.. if you put your saddle in the same spot in relation to the BB as on a similar reach bike, the Large Atlas Carbon is not that large. You only get in trouble when on the brink of medium/large sizes AND you have either short quads or want to sit quite forward. It could very well be that, because of the slack seat tube angle, you are running out of rail length on the back of the seat to clamp it in the position you want.

  40. #140
    Monkey Wrench
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by jizzim View Post
    Ultimately I would like to make a trip to Moab and other trail systems. With that said, would you guys whole heartedly recommend a 120mm fork for "one size generally does all"?
    The Whole Enchilada is on the top of my list to ride either before the year is over or sometime next..
    I just did the Whole Enchilada on my 140mm equipped AtlasC - it went as quickly as my trip down the trail on my Sultan with a 140mm fork last fall. In some sections (Hazard County) it was faster than the Sultan with it's FAR faster handling. In a few sections I was a little sketched with the reduced stability compared to the bus-length Sultan, but I learned that it really loved to manual through sections, allowing a semi-float/jump over rough stuff.
    My buddy Justin was on his 120mm SID equipped AtlasC (with smaller tires and light Stan's Crest wheels) and had to stop repeatedly to relax his upper body. That said, he still believes that the 120mm is his better setup since 99.9% of his riding is in northern Arkansas where tight and twisty with no chunky descents is the norm.

    I think it all depends on your normal riding - I don't find the 140mm hampers me at all on climbs, but if I had a big travel bike to complement the AtlasC, I would drop it to 120mm to increase it's overall balance between front and rear travel (and to reduce weight a little bit). I love fast chunky Enduro-style trail riding, and this bike eats it up while giving me a good advantage on climbs.
    Let me fix your bike @ ordinarybicycle.net in Louisville, CO

  41. #141
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    35
    Pulled the tirgger, my LBS is ordering in a 29er Atlas Carbon RC, must say I am really excited. I was going to get all XT components but Devinci said its too late in the season to do full custom builds. Could have gotten the LBS to build it but then I would have to sell off all the other components, so I just went with the stock. Only thing I am going to be switching out is the X7 FD for an XT FD.

  42. #142
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    266
    Anyone have experience with the Transition Bandit 29 or Stumpjumper Evo FSR 29? I own/owned both and am curious to hear how the Atlas compares to them.

    I know they're in somewhat different categories, but any info would be much appreciated

    Thanks!

  43. #143
    mtbr member
    Reputation: silent713's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    113
    Wish I had a shop close by that dealt with them. I've asked two of the locals if they'd be interested in bringing them in, only to have both shake their heads in response.
    A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way.

  44. #144
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    822
    Finally, I've got quality pics of my Atlas! Here is it the way I ride it in tough terrain, with Hans Dampfs (trailstar front, pacestar rear).

    It's a size large, in permanent 'lo' config, with a 120mm WB Loop fork (for reference, I am about 5'11"-6'). Shifting duty for XTR (old/new mix), with the shadow+ rear mech doing a stellar job. Steering is done with a Syntace stem (90mm) and Easton Haven carbon bars (710mm). There's a light Salsa chainguard on there that gets some bashguard use... wonder how long that one will hold up . The rear Am Classic 101 rim did not... It has developed cracks at the spokeholes and that'll teach me not to do tough, rocky terrain on light XC rims, at least on the rear wheel. It's too bad, cause I really liked the tubeless characteristics of these.

    It has the 135 QR dropout kit right now, because I use a Powertap rear hub.

    Planned 'upgrades': A crank based powermeter (to arrive within a month), which allows me to switch to a Maxle rear wheel. I am curious if I can feel the theoretical extra amount of stiffness of the Maxle! The hub will be a DT 240s hub, but I have not decided yet on the choice of rim. Maybe WTB Frequency i19 or something light & tubeless ready, but not as light as the AC 101 . No Notubes rims for me, as I hate the fact that you cannot run a lot of TLR tires on the market. Bad news for a tire fetishist like me .

    Also the cockpit will be changed to a 740mm 3T bar and a 70mm stem. After that, I'll be saving up for an enduro proof wheelset with WTB Frequency i23 rims and some cheapish hubs. I guess it makes sense to have a dedicated set for all mountain/ enduro use (I've entered some races) and another for Marathon XC racing, so there is no compromise between weight and strength either way.

    Devinci Atlas Carbon-img_8371_vz.jpg
    Last edited by JeroenK; 06-10-2013 at 01:43 PM.

  45. #145
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    200
    I am having a world of troubles trying to set up the stock Easton XC wheelset tubeless. I cannot get the tire bead to seat. I have tried a Hans Dampf tubeless ready EVO and a Nobby Nic dual compound. Even with tubes I can't really get the bead to snap in. I have set up many different tires tubeless before and never had problems like this.

  46. #146
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    113

    Devinci Atlas Carbon

    This bike scares me! It is frikin fast! Never have I run my downhill oriented trails so fast and controlled I have finnaly got my wheels, and they suit this bike very well.
    Sorry about the steerertube, needs to be cut, but was too eager to bike

    Setup:
    X9 brakes 200/180
    X0 gears
    E13 TRS race cranks
    Reverb
    Syntace cokpit
    Syntace W35 wheels

    Devinci Atlas Carbon-imageuploadedbytapatalk1371020427.732935.jpgDevinci Atlas Carbon-imageuploadedbytapatalk1371020443.117592.jpgDevinci Atlas Carbon-imageuploadedbytapatalk1371020463.876239.jpgDevinci Atlas Carbon-imageuploadedbytapatalk1371020476.714609.jpgDevinci Atlas Carbon-imageuploadedbytapatalk1371020489.556743.jpgDevinci Atlas Carbon-imageuploadedbytapatalk1371020502.891958.jpgDevinci Atlas Carbon-imageuploadedbytapatalk1371020514.243688.jpg
    Devinci Atlas Carbon-imageuploadedbytapatalk1371020624.136175.jpg

  47. #147
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    35

    Devinci Atlas Carbon

    Quote Originally Posted by Nilsern View Post
    This bike scares me! It is frikin fast! Never have I run my downhill oriented trails so fast and controlled I have finnaly got my wheels, and they suit this bike very well.
    Sorry about the steerertube, needs to be cut, but was too eager to bike

    Setup:
    X9 brakes 200/180
    X0 gears
    E13 TRS race cranks
    Reverb
    Syntace cokpit
    Syntace W35 wheels
    Looks awesome, saw mine at the bike shop yesterday in the box, just has to be built up and it's ready to roll!
    Last edited by Unkown; 06-14-2013 at 07:44 AM.

  48. #148
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    822
    Quote Originally Posted by Unkown View Post
    Looks awesome, saw mine at the bike shop yesterday in the box, just has to be built up and it's ready to roll!
    Yup, real nice job with all that Syntace! Wow, the fixed, wider bit of that Reverb seems to be even closer to the seatpost clamp than mine. I like the looks of it that way, but you were really lucky to get away with the 125mm at your seat height, it seems.

    @Unkown, if you edit your post and delete the pics in your quote, this page will be a bit easier to view .

  49. #149
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    113

    Devinci Atlas Carbon

    Quote Originally Posted by JeroenK View Post
    Yup, real nice job with all that Syntace! Wow, the fixed, wider bit of that Reverb seems to be even closer to the seatpost clamp than mine. I like the looks of it that way, but you were really lucky to get away with the 125mm at your seat height, it seems.

    @Unkown, if you edit your post and delete the pics in your quote, this page will be a bit easier to view .
    Hehe i've got a long torso but short legs. Really like the Large though, with its longer Reach. But the seatpost could have been a few mm shorter. I'm thinking of trying a 100mm reverb to check if it works better for me. I usually don't lower my post all the way.

  50. #150
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    35
    Devinci Atlas Carbon-devinci-29er.jpg

    Picked her up yesterday, man is it fast! Went for a short ride this morning on some gravel roads, couldn't get on the trails because they are way to wet.

Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Devinci Atlas RC
    By S:Drive in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 10-26-2014, 07:27 PM
  2. 2013 Devinci Atlas carbon 29er
    By jhardeman in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-18-2013, 11:03 AM
  3. Devinci Atlas
    By jenndy in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-19-2013, 10:45 PM
  4. Mach 429 vs. Devinci Atlas
    By irishpitbull in forum Pivot Cycles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-14-2012, 09:27 AM
  5. Devinci Atlas
    By mtbmitch2 in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-07-2012, 08:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •