Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 101
  1. #1
    drev-il, not Dr. Evil!
    Reputation: Drevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,267

    Click here if you like to look at other men's Matted Chesthair

    I got my Matt Chester Mutinyman recently and have put about 90 miles on it. Noticeable weight difference and handling, so we're still getting acquainted. I've scared myself launching off little things and getting more air than I'm used to because the Mute's a lot lighter than my Karate Monkey The Monkey, which I've been riding since February, weighs about 26.5 lbs, while this bike weighs 21.75 lbs as built. This bike also steers more quickly than the Monkey, so I've got to learn to relax a little more.

    Details, if you're into that stuff:
    • Matt Chester Mutinyman: 72 degree HA, ?? SA. TT low enough so I don't hurt my crotch on dismounts
    • Waltworks fork: 430mm A-C, 50mm rake
    • King headset
    • Thomson stem: 100mm x 5 degree rise
    • Moots post
    • Seven bar: 26" wide, 11 degree sweep
    • Oury grips
    • Flite saddle
    • Paul compact levers
    • Avid mech disc front brake
    • Shimano XTR rear brake
    • King (constantly loosening rear SS and ISO front) hubs
    • Salsa Delgado rims
    • Ignitor rear tire (folding)
    • Exiwolf front tire (folding)
    • Bonty 29 x 2.1 tubes
    • Raceface cranks 175mm
    • Shimano UN-73 BB
    • Salsa bash guard
    • Surly 34T ring
    • King 20T steel cog
    • SRAM PC-58 chain
    • Shimano 959 pedals
    • Jen Green head badge


    I was a little worried about how skinny the fork looked when I got it, but after riding it a little bit, it has worked fine. It flexes back and forth, but none of that shuddering while braking that I've heard about on ultra lightweight/skinny forks. Lots of clearance with the Exiwolf also!

    FWIW, Me: 5' 8.5", 158 lbs, 32" inseam.

    Thanks Matt and Walt!
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Drevil; 11-15-2005 at 08:50 PM. Reason: gramatikal erors
    "Keep your burgers lean and your tires fat." -h.d. | bikecentric | ssoft

  2. #2
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    6,252
    Simple. Clean. Classic.

    May it give you years of trouble free smiles...

    MC

  3. #3
    giddy up!
    Reputation: donkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,199
    Wow....that thing is just awesome. Dreamy.....dare I say perfect.

    Are those rack mounts on the dropouts? Nice touch if soo.

    B
    www.thepathbikeshop.com

  4. #4
    meh....
    Reputation: Monte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,590
    Quote Originally Posted by Drevil
    • Waltworks fork: 430mm A-C, 50mm rake
    Nice bike. That fork would scare me, it's skinny!

    Monte

  5. #5
    Bored
    Reputation: bigwheelboy_490's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    1,910
    I had some hesitation opening this thread. Then using some feeble minded deduction, I realized what you might be talking about. I'm glad I opened this thread.

    As stated earlier, clean and elegant. I really like the lines on this bike! Still love the look of a classic leather flite saddle!

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: extrafunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    53
    I love the head badge. The bike's nice too.

  7. #7
    Don't be a sheep
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    3,297
    Quote Originally Posted by Drevil
    I got my Matt Chester Mutinyman recently and have put about 90 miles on it. Noticeable weight difference and handling, so we're still getting acquainted. I've scared myself launching off little things and getting more air than I'm used to because the Mute's a lot lighter than my Karate Monkey The Monkey, which I've been riding since February, weighs about 26.5 lbs, while this bike weighs 21.75 lbs as built. This bike also steers more quickly than the Monkey, so I've got to learn to relax a little more.

    Details, if you're into that stuff:
    • Matt Chester Mutinyman: 72 degree HA, ?? SA. TT low enough so I don't hurt my crotch on dismounts
    • Waltworks fork: 430mm A-C, 50mm rake
    • King headset
    • Thomson stem: 100mm x 5 degree rise
    • Moots post
    • Seven bar: 26" wide, 11 degree sweep
    • Oury grips
    • Flite saddle
    • Paul compact levers
    • Avid mech disc front brake
    • Shimano XTR rear brake
    • King (constantly loosening rear SS and ISO front) hubs
    • Salsa Delgado rims
    • Ignitor rear tire (folding)
    • Exiwolf front tire (folding)
    • Bonty 29 x 2.1 tubes
    • Raceface cranks 175mm
    • Shimano UN-73 BB
    • Salsa bash guard
    • Surly 34T ring
    • King 20T steel cog
    • SRAM PC-58 chain
    • Shimano 959 pedals
    • Jen Green head badge


    I was a little worried about how skinny the fork looked when I got it, but after riding it a little bit, it has worked fine. It flexes back and forth, but none of that shuddering while braking that I've heard about on ultra lightweight/skinny forks. Lots of clearance with the Exiwolf also!

    FWIW, Me: 5' 8.5", 158 lbs, 32" inseam.

    Thanks Matt and Walt!

    Hey a triangle frame, the easiest way to make a light, stiff, resilient, well handling bike. After all the freak show bikes I've seen lately it's a breath of fresh air.
    "Do not touch the trim"

  8. #8
    elbow gloves
    Reputation: kinkcrazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    221

    Diggin the white

    pleasing to the eye, MC's always are

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: AteMrYeats's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    804
    Quote Originally Posted by Drevil
    This bike also steers more quickly than the Monkey, so I've got to learn to relax a little more.
    Try not to break this one, Rick. I just wish you were a little taller...and rode Eggs...so I could have a go on that pretty little thing.

  10. #10
    DiscoCowboy
    Reputation: Allroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    344

    haha

    Quote Originally Posted by AteMrYeats
    Try not to break this one, Rick. I just wish you were a little taller...and rode Eggs...so I could have a go on that pretty little thing.
    you would probably break it then he'd have to wait another 2 years for a new one...
    Looks better in the pix than in person...

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    397

    A Very

    Poetic build.

    Kudos.

  12. #12
    now known as P.I.-SSer
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    228
    sweet headbadge!

    as we would say back here, "ASTEEEEG!"

  13. #13
    Recovering couch patato
    Reputation: Cloxxki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    14,005
    Holy smokes, 7mm more offset than the KM fork, same head angle. I can only imagine how quickly it handles... My Cube on paper is 72.25º/43mm now, also with a Walt fork, and that's already plenty quick to pester the babywheelers on singletrack :-)

    I love how that bike looks, and I've got a serious thing for lightweight 29"ers. Respect for your commitment to go non-suspension corrected. Or is that the only way these frames come? :-)

  14. #14
    Category Winner
    Reputation: teamdicky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,519

    The fork?

    I have never seen a WW fork with tapered legs. Is that a new thing?
    WWW.TEAMDICKY.COM

    I get paid 3¢ every time I post on MTBR.

  15. #15
    Belltown Brazer
    Reputation: MDEnvEngr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    640
    Drevil,
    Yours could be a cousin to my Strong. Especially when I put my Walt fork on it. The buildup and look is so close to mine that you know I like it!

    How do you like the Seven bar? Have you ridden a Mary/H-bar to compare the 11 deg sweep with?

    As mentioned in my thread, it sounds like you and I are in the same boat. Much lighter, quicker bike making the transition a bit of a challenge. I must admit in my case I was slightly put off. After all the waiting and planning I was expecting the angels to choir when I hit the trails. Instead, I could tell the bike is *going* to be great, but that it is going to take some dialing in and quality saddle time to fully bond. After 3 rides and a stem change, saddle change and some fork fiddling I could say that the angels are clearing their throats.

    I guess no different than my first 29er. I could tell it was different, and mostly better. After a year of riding the 29er I had to use one of my old 26ers while waiting for busted up parts. Then I could tell that the 29er was so much better.

    Anyway, enjoy the bike...I hope for many happy miles for you two.

    B

  16. #16
    drev-il, not Dr. Evil!
    Reputation: Drevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,267
    Cloxx/MDEnvEngr: Yes, the bike steers really fast and I've crashed a few times because of it. I figure like any new bike/gizmo, it'll take some rides to get used to it. I liked Jones H-bars when I first tried them, hated them for a couple of weeks later, then loved them thereafter (and after the proper callouses built up). I'm experimenting with position still, and the bars are a little higher than I like. I'm used to them being ~1" lower than the top of the saddle. Right now they're about even.

    Why no H-bar? I wanted to see if I missed flat bars. I'm getting a Mary for my wife's bike, but will probably play with it myself for a little while. I've got a lot of time.

    I'm pretty sure Matt builds sussy corrected, but I won't put suspension on this bike, so I figured why have it sit up so high? As it is, with no spacers underneath the stem, it still feels a squidge high. (I guess I have short legs?) Flipping the stem (or trying a 0 rise) will take care of that.

    Teamdicky: Nope, not new. I've had this fork since May, and I've seen it in another post: Q: 1" Rigid Forks - apologies in advance

    Donkey/Striker: Yup, rack mounts. Good for those long jaunts in the woods, the Great Divide Race , or carrying Allroy's mama.
    "Keep your burgers lean and your tires fat." -h.d. | bikecentric | ssoft

  17. #17
    Category Winner
    Reputation: teamdicky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,519

    Well

    Teamdicky: Nope, not new. I've had this fork since May, and I've seen it in another post: Q: 1" Rigid Forks - apologies in advance

    Maybe it just wasn't an option for me. I wanted a 473mm fork built with a lean to the stronger rather than lighter side. The tapered legs do look nice. Makes me miss my KM fork (only from an aesthetic point of view).
    WWW.TEAMDICKY.COM

    I get paid 3¢ every time I post on MTBR.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Soupboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,036

    A picture

    of this ride should be in every dictionary next to the word bicycle.

    Sweetness
    Professional Amateur. Disagree? Submit your grievances here.

  19. #19
    pepito
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    640

    Good job!

    i'm sure it was worth the wait. that thing is a beauty. i've been wondering when you'd post it up. enjoy!
    "Melancholy is incompatible with bicycling" ~James E. Starrs

  20. #20
    Kill your... television
    Reputation: motoman711's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    912
    Quote Originally Posted by Drevil
    This bike also steers more quickly than the Monkey, so I've got to learn to relax a little more.
    I swapped out my Jones H-Bars on my monkey for a set of flat bars (the H-bars went on my Wily). The bike feels noticeably quicker steering. It just takes a while to get used to it.
    "Whereas Motoman's bike looks like an industrial, TinkerToy experiment gone horribly wrong." - Aquaholic

    Ti
    Misfit

  21. #21
    try driving your car less
    Reputation: jh_on_the_cape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,976
    dude, finally. looks cool. be sure not to poo your shorts or that seat will get ruined.

    i had white bar tape on a road bike once and it looks like i took a dump on it within a few weeks.

    you should get a white suit to go with it. like boss hog


    Only boring people get bored.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CJones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    327
    Drevil, new ride looks awesome. Matt Chester makes some sweet frames. His website blog is always interesting too. Couple of questions:

    What kind seatpost clamp is that?

    What does the "MC DIY" sticker stand for?
    Matt-Chester Do-It-Yourself?

    Do the seatstays have a slight s-bend to them, or is it just the angle of the pics?

    Thanks for posting. Very nice build.

  23. #23
    paintbucket
    Reputation: wooglin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,822
    Beautiful bike, Drevil. Clean.
    When the going gets weird its bedtime.

  24. #24
    Account Retired
    Reputation: LakeRaven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    608
    aye caramba!

    eye-gasm.....and I bet it rides sweeter than it looks

    g

  25. #25
    Cold. Blue. Steel.
    Reputation: OneGearGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    1,705

    Albino Blinglespeed!

    Congrats on the beautiful build. I am likening it to an albino blinglespeed, heh-heh

    That is one sweet and unique build. I suppose the rear V will give you that patented Chester plush ride with the softer seat stays. The best looking mullet ever!

    I am really preferring my 11 degree, 26" wide flat Salsa ProMoto bars over the H-bars these days. I loved the H for the first few weeks, but after my first 12 hour solo race, I changed my mind. I certainly loved the Ti feel, though.

    I believe Walt's forks are truly the best out there right now. I wouldn't worry about strength or longevity one bit!

    GG
    Spinning and Grinning...

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Hot Deals

Contests

Latest Mountain Bike Articles

Videos

MTBR on Facebook