Page 5 of 21 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 401 to 500 of 2008
  1. #401
    mtbr member
    Reputation: EVERYUSERNAMEISTAKEN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    394
    Quote Originally Posted by eurospek View Post
    What bash you running on those SLX cranks? I kinda like it.
    It came off of a Truvativ Stylo 1.1 crankset that I have.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. #402
    hispanic mechanic
    Reputation: sslos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,480
    Update:
    I am happier with this bike every time I ride it.
    I changed out my cranks twice now, and very pleased with the newest set up. The White Industries crank required a 122mm BB, which was really flexy- to the point of hitting the chainstay when I'd crank hard enough.
    Next, I tried the Ritchey WCS cranks off of my Pugsley. Stiffer, but I had to space the ISIS BB over a bit to the drive side to clear the chainstay under hard efforts (again.)
    Both of those were 170mm. I've been dialing in my wife's position on her bike, and noticed her XTs are 175mm, which are too long for her leg length, so I traded her.
    Yesterday, I rode Government Canyon, a rocky, steep local trail. The increased stiffness was noticeable, and with the sustained, all-out effort climbs, I think I'm liking the gained leverage of the additional whopping 5mm of crank length.
    I didn't notice an increase in pedal strikes, and had no problem staying on top of the cranks.
    This was probably the most technically difficult climbing and descending I've done on the N9 to date. Not the steepest, and it IS Texas so the climbs and descents aren't super long, but it's tough on the single speed. I've punctured my rear tire (sliced the sidewall twice, punched through the tread once,) on the last three rides there...on the climbs!
    I was thinking, as I was patching my AKA, that this bike felt like it was made for this kind of riding. Then I remembered thinking the same thing the first time I took it on our extended-rockgarden chunkfest, and on the fast, swoopy waterbar laden Boise trails, and the alpine Bogus trails...
    Here's some pics from yesterday.




    Los
    Last edited by sslos; 10-18-2011 at 07:46 PM.
    Whiskey is my yoga.

    dongerparty.com

  3. #403
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    28
    I am on my 2nd set of cranks as well. The XTR 960's rubbed the stays when I was really pushing it up a hill. That was with two spacers on the drive side. it would clear when not flexing though. I went back to the XT crank I had on it originally and everything is back to normal with only one spacer. Definitely something to watch out for if you are building this and don't have a couple cranksets in the garage. I'm considering getting a Shimano Hone for this bike. Steel pedal inserts and spindle seem like exactly what this bike deserves. Plus my wife needs her XT back

  4. #404
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by WRX-Rob View Post
    The XTR 960's rubbed the stays when I was really pushing it up a hill. That was with two spacers on the drive side. it would clear when not flexing though. I went back to the XT crank I had on it originally and everything is back to normal with only one spacer.
    Good to know I'm not the only one with cranks rubbing the stays. I have the same problem you mention with my XTR 970's...

    I have my cranks mounted with one spacer on the drive side (like always) and the distance between the crank arms and the stays are are not the same on each side. I have like 3,5 mm on the drive side and 6 mm on the non-drive side.

    I've ordered some 0,7 mm spacers so I can get the cranks centered but from your experience the crank arm still hit the stays with 5 mm spacers installed...

    I'm not a heavy rider, only around 165 lbs so the frame and cranks should be plenty stiff for my weight....a little annoying.

    Other than that it's a great frame.

  5. #405
    .......
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,707
    Wait, your CRANKS hit the stays??? I've got XT's (M760) with one spacer on the drive side and never had issues. Heel strike every once in a while.

  6. #406
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by p nut View Post
    Wait, your CRANKS hit the stays??? I've got XT's (M760) with one spacer on the drive side and never had issues. Heel strike every once in a while.
    Yes CRANKS. No issues with XT with only one spacer. XTR hit with two spacers.

  7. #407
    .......
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,707
    Was the crank length the same on both of your cranks? Mine's the standard 175's.

  8. #408
    hispanic mechanic
    Reputation: sslos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,480
    Quote Originally Posted by p nut View Post
    Was the crank length the same on both of your cranks? Mine's the standard 175's.
    The XTR M970 cranks (all XTR cranks, actually,) are lower profile than the XTs, which explains the discrepancy. Although it was challenging for me to finally stop using square taper cranks due to the width of the stays, everything else about this bike makes it so worthwhile!
    I would regularly hit the CS with the inside corner of the WI crank on the driveside while powering through to pull the front wheel up, even with 1cm of clearance. I have about 7mm with the XT, and Monday's ride required lots of wheelies up ledges, cranking hard to get up steep rock gardens, over big exposed roots and logs, you name it. No contact whatsoever.

    Los
    Whiskey is my yoga.

    dongerparty.com

  9. #409
    .......
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,707
    Wow, didn't know those WI cranks (and ST bb) flexed that much.

  10. #410
    trail rat
    Reputation: slocaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    7,814
    You guys are bumming me out on the square taper issue now.
    "The physician heals, Nature makes well" - real fortune cookie

    CCCMB trail work for trail access - SLO, CA

  11. #411
    hispanic mechanic
    Reputation: sslos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,480
    Yeah, I really thought I'd stay with ST until I couldn't find them any more.
    My experiences lately have sold me on external BBs.

    Los
    Whiskey is my yoga.

    dongerparty.com

  12. #412
    banned
    Reputation: random walk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,666
    Does anyone know of a successful N9 build using 180mm cranks?

  13. #413
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cluster_tolerance's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    222
    Quote Originally Posted by random walk View Post
    Does anyone know of a successful N9 build using 180mm cranks?
    Yup, I is. No problems at all, I have XT cranks with a spacer on the drive side. The fork is at 120mm and I doubt I'll go lower. I might just to see how it is but I am really enjoying the ride. No pedal strikes yet, I ride my X-bike fixt and I have just gotten used to having the pedals in the right place at the right time. Best riding production frame I have ever owned.
    Reading Features...
    Cracking Features...
    Assembling Features...

  14. #414
    banned
    Reputation: random walk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,666
    Thanks!

  15. #415
    mtbr member
    Reputation: EVERYUSERNAMEISTAKEN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    394
    Got out for a ride this morning. I am supposed to be packing up the house since we are preparing to move on Monday but I just couldn't help myself. The weather was perfect! Didn't get any action shots because I was riding solo but I did turn around to take a piss and then I saw my Nimble perched up on the top of a rock begging to roll it again. I think the Canfield Brothers may have gave these frames some "special" touches. I kept hearing the phrase MUST FIND MORE ROCK TO RIDE bouncing around in my head! Crazy!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Canfield Nimble 9 build thread!-img_0222.jpg  

    Canfield Nimble 9 build thread!-img_0226.jpg  

    Canfield Nimble 9 build thread!-img_0225.jpg  

    Canfield Nimble 9 build thread!-img_0229.jpg  

    Canfield Nimble 9 build thread!-img_0231.jpg  


  16. #416
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    544
    Sweet pics! I've been riding my N9 exclusively for the last 3 weeks...took my Vassago rigid SS out this morning for the first time. It felt weird! Only did 10 miles on a pretty mellow but fun trail and was constantly thinking about my Nimble! Sorry Jabber, you might sitting out more often.

  17. #417
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    30

    My Black Devil

    <table style="width:auto;"><tr><td><a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/D356CjYNAt9Qmnbke8Uo2A?feat=embedwebsite"><img src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-0-Gw1qoqTCc/TqDg4cKl1sI/AAAAAAAAAGk/6ZMoZnS5owE/s144/DSCF0001.JPG" height="96" width="144" /></a></td></tr><tr><td style="font-family:arial,sans-serif; font-size:11px; text-align:right">Od <a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/108543226678960504994/Nimble9?authuser=0&feat=embedwebsite">Nimble 9</a></td></tr></table>

  18. #418
    Canfield Brothers
    Reputation: flymybike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,097
    Glad to see everyone is enjoying there Nimble 9's!

    With the fit issues of the XTR cranks, they have a narrower chainline than what we designed too. The N9 needs a 50mm chainline, XTR is 47.5 . Most road cranks are narrower but they don't need tire clearance like MTB. So with a 50-51 chainline (like most all 3 ring mtb cranks) you'll have proper crank clearance and can still fit large volume tires.

    Managing to fit large tires, have short chainstays and the option for a front derailler is a tall order. Something must give so alot of other companys just make it single ring only or skimp on tire clearance to achive the short chainstay. We wanted it all so fitting really tight chainline cranks was not on the list. (Sorry XTR fans )
    http://www.canfieldbrothers.com/frames
    Building bikes that make you smile!
    www.mtbparks.com
    All Bike Park, All the time.

  19. #419
    hispanic mechanic
    Reputation: sslos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,480

    Meh...

    Quote Originally Posted by flymybike View Post
    Glad to see everyone is enjoying there Nimble 9's!

    With the fit issues of the XTR cranks, they have a narrower chainline than what we designed too. The N9 needs a 50mm chainline, XTR is 47.5 . Most road cranks are narrower but they don't need tire clearance like MTB. So with a 50-51 chainline (like most all 3 ring mtb cranks) you'll have proper crank clearance and can still fit large volume tires.

    Managing to fit large tires, have short chainstays and the option for a front derailler is a tall order. Something must give so alot of other companys just make it single ring only or skimp on tire clearance to achive the short chainstay. We wanted it all so fitting really tight chainline cranks was not on the list. (Sorry XTR fans )
    Not being able to run XTR cranks is definitely a worthwhile exchange for all the great things about these frames. Still loving the hell outta mine!

    Los
    Whiskey is my yoga.

    dongerparty.com

  20. #420
    Addicted to Dirt
    Reputation: ingluis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    674
    Nimble 9 crushed the Pisgah gnar for 5 straight days, but didn't like the flying rocks too much, sadness.


  21. #421
    .......
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,707
    I might have to 3M my downtube.

  22. #422
    West Chester, PA
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,019
    Quote Originally Posted by ingluis View Post
    Nimble 9 crushed the Pisgah gnar for 5 straight days, but didn't like the flying rocks too much, sadness.
    Look on the bright side. At least it wasn't a $2,000+ custom. Right ?

  23. #423
    trail rat
    Reputation: slocaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    7,814
    Quote Originally Posted by p nut View Post
    I might have to 3M my downtube.
    I thought GITD was nuke proof too?
    "The physician heals, Nature makes well" - real fortune cookie

    CCCMB trail work for trail access - SLO, CA

  24. #424
    aka baycat
    Reputation: Ryan G.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,484
    Are people using the cable guides for their der cables or disc brake lines? Running a 1x9 through cable guides right now and will zip tie the disc brake lines

  25. #425
    .......
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,707
    Quote Originally Posted by slocaus View Post
    I thought GITD was nuke proof too?
    Only in the dark.

    While you're on the net, might as well head over to Canfield and place an order for that über-cool green frame. With all this lurking in this thread, you're bound to buy one anyway.

  26. #426
    hispanic mechanic
    Reputation: sslos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,480
    Quote Originally Posted by ingluis View Post
    Nimble 9 crushed the Pisgah gnar for 5 straight days, but didn't like the flying rocks too much, sadness.
    Dang, yo!
    How big is that dent?

    Los
    Whiskey is my yoga.

    dongerparty.com

  27. #427
    Addicted to Dirt
    Reputation: ingluis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    674
    Quote Originally Posted by sslos View Post
    Dang, yo!
    How big is that dent?

    Los
    It's about 1 square inch... I sanded the area today, didn't see any obvious cracks! Good ole 4130, I sprayed a little clear coat so I can monitor it.

    Set it up for local riding, 32x17 with a half link, dropouts are slammed!

  28. #428
    hispanic mechanic
    Reputation: sslos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,480
    Quote Originally Posted by ingluis View Post
    It's about 1 square inch... I sanded the area today, didn't see any obvious cracks! Good ole 4130, I sprayed a little clear coat so I can monitor it.

    Set it up for local riding, 32x17 with a half link, dropouts are slammed!
    Yeah, one of many things I love about steel!
    I had a mondo rock come up and bounce off of my downtube, then break my rear valve stem. No dents, though.

    Los
    Whiskey is my yoga.

    dongerparty.com

  29. #429
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Myers005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    105
    FWIW, no problems with XTR M960 SS mod cranks (170mm) on my Nimble.

  30. #430
    Addicted to Dirt
    Reputation: ingluis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    674
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan G. View Post
    Are people using the cable guides for their der cables or disc brake lines? Running a 1x9 through cable guides right now and will zip tie the disc brake lines
    Just tie all the cables through the guide using a single zip tie.

  31. #431
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    13

    anyone running a maxxis ardent 2.4 in the back of a nimble 9 ?

    or know if they fit ok ?

  32. #432
    .......
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,707
    Quote Originally Posted by LOBSTERJOHNSON View Post
    or know if they fit ok ?
    Don't worry. There is plenty of room.

  33. #433
    hispanic mechanic
    Reputation: sslos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,480
    Quote Originally Posted by p nut View Post
    Don't worry. There is plenty of room.
    Yeah, even if you are using P35s.

    Los
    Whiskey is my yoga.

    dongerparty.com

  34. #434
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mojojojoaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    761
    Quote Originally Posted by esku View Post
    It's one of the nicest frame I ever had.
    .
    Wish I had the money because this is exactly what I want in a 29er. Exactly.

  35. #435
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by Myers005 View Post
    FWIW, no problems with XTR M960 SS mod cranks (170mm) on my Nimble.
    Looks like 170 is the key to your success.

  36. #436
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WarPigs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    797
    Hi, I cant figure out the drawing at the Nimble 9's website, can anyone help me with the standover height for a small Nimble 9, with a 100mm and 120mm fork? thanks.
    Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

  37. #437
    aka baycat
    Reputation: Ryan G.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,484
    Finally up and running. A quick shakedown ride through the City on sporadic singletrack on the old army base.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Canfield Nimble 9 build thread!-uploadfromtaptalk1319755489404.jpg  

    Canfield Nimble 9 build thread!-uploadfromtaptalk1319755504063.jpg  


  38. #438
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    Awesome thanks for the info. Eventually I will get this frame with WI cranks.

  39. #439
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    Sweet bike AOK. I am freakin drooling over here in San Diego! Argh! The blue complements that Fox fork. Is that a Large frame? I'm 5'11" with 32" inseam and heard that a Large will fit me but not sure.

  40. #440
    Canfield Brothers
    Reputation: flymybike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,097
    Quote Originally Posted by WarPigs View Post
    Hi, I cant figure out the drawing at the Nimble 9's website, can anyone help me with the standover height for a small Nimble 9, with a 100mm and 120mm fork? thanks.
    A small is about 15".

    16" seat tube, TT is about 1 1/2" lower and the BB is about 1/2" higher on a 120mm fork.
    http://www.canfieldbrothers.com/frames
    Building bikes that make you smile!
    www.mtbparks.com
    All Bike Park, All the time.

  41. #441
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    Sweet bike rasse, arghh I want one now! I'm the same height as you and judging by the pics a medium will fit me if I max out my Thomson post. Hopefully not too much. How long is that Moots post?

  42. #442
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    Me likey!

  43. #443
    aka baycat
    Reputation: Ryan G.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,484
    So running a 90mm 4x Thomson stem and Sunline OS riser bar and thinking about shortening the stem considerably down to trying a 50mm and a flat bar. Anyone running a combo like that?

  44. #444
    .......
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,707
    Quote Originally Posted by mtbnachos View Post
    Sweet bike AOK. I am freakin drooling over here in San Diego! Argh! The blue complements that Fox fork. Is that a Large frame? I'm 5'11" with 32" inseam and heard that a Large will fit me but not sure.
    I'm about your height with 32.5" inseam. Medium fits well. I've got a 410mm Thomson post, but not maxed out. 80mm stem with a 800 mm flat bar and the fit is spot on.

  45. #445
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GearTech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    443
    Click the image to go to the full album


    I was going to wait until I had it built up but it's taking awhile to gather the parts so here's the frame. Going to start life as a single speed with a possible switch to 1x9 or 1x10 down the road.

    Planned Build:
    Frame: Medium N9
    Fork: White Brothers Loop29 120mm (on its way to me)
    Stem: Spank Oozy Stem
    Bars: Spank Subrosa 747
    Cranks: FSA Afterburner
    Wheels: Still haven't figured that one out.
    Brakes: Avid X0 possibly XX
    Headset: FSA
    Post: FSA
    Saddle: WTB TBD
    Tires: Schwalbe NN

  46. #446
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GearTech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    443
    And one of it glowing in the dark...

  47. #447
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WarPigs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    797
    Quote Originally Posted by flymybike View Post
    A small is about 15".

    16" seat tube, TT is about 1 1/2" lower and the BB is about 1/2" higher on a 120mm fork.
    Thanks, I emailed Canfield and Sean Gollub answered my query, he told me its "Stand over in the middle of the bike is about 28" depending on fork and headset."
    Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

  48. #448
    Addicted to Dirt
    Reputation: ingluis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    674
    Quote Originally Posted by pablo_goral View Post
    <table style="width:auto;"><tr><td><a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/D356CjYNAt9Qmnbke8Uo2A?feat=embedwebsite"><img src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-0-Gw1qoqTCc/TqDg4cKl1sI/AAAAAAAAAGk/6ZMoZnS5owE/s144/DSCF0001.JPG" height="96" width="144" /></a></td></tr><tr><td style="font-family:arial,sans-serif; font-size:11px; text-align:right">Od <a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/108543226678960504994/Nimble9?authuser=0&feat=embedwebsite">Nimble 9</a></td></tr></table>
    Wow, super nice.

  49. #449
    the mountian is within
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    543
    Anyone else like their sliders all the way back? I keep trying forward-but even 5mm feels odd to me. I have a dropper post now,and with that in the tight twistys-it rails-and the front stays down on seated climbs-even with a 120mm fork. I luv me some adjustability!
    i own a bikeshop in WV thetruewheelwv.com

  50. #450
    aka baycat
    Reputation: Ryan G.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,484
    Quote Originally Posted by 29buzz View Post
    Anyone else like their sliders all the way back? I keep trying forward-but even 5mm feels odd to me. I have a dropper post now,and with that in the tight twistys-it rails-and the front stays down on seated climbs-even with a 120mm fork. I luv me some adjustability!

    Mine are slammed all the way forward but this bike is one of the best I have owned. It doesn't feel like any other 29er I have had. Bike is very manuverable, eats up small chunk and the geo is spot on with a 100mm fork and 15qr. Just need to play around with seat position, try a non-setback seatpost and try some flat bars.

  51. #451
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Myers005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    105
    Still dialing mine in. Small frame, just installed the setback post which definitely helped riding position, especially descending. Also switched out a Reba for a Fox Terralogic (thanks JMS!). I got tired of flipping the lockout - just wanted to set-and-forget. First ride today, loved the Terralogic! Today was the best ride so far, this thing just loves to climb
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Canfield Nimble 9 build thread!-dscn2111s.jpg  


  52. #452
    hispanic mechanic
    Reputation: sslos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,480
    Nice, Myers005!
    I'd like to maybe try a Terralogic one of these days.
    Right now, I'm trying a rigid again. It's been about a year and a half since I've been using suspension, and I decided I wanted to see if rigid was an option for me on this bike.
    I think, due to the lower front end, it actually seems harder to loft the front with the Salsa than the Fox set to 100mm. If I don't miss the suspension too much, I may try the upcoming White Bros. Rock Solid 495mm.

    Los
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Whiskey is my yoga.

    dongerparty.com

  53. #453
    .......
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,707
    Ha! I rode last week on a Cromoto Grande while my Reba was getting rebuilt and lengthened to 100mm. I liked the rigid ride. But I do agree the fork needs to be longer. I was getting the same amount of pedal strikes as with an 80mm fork. Anyone know of any steel fork options that are ~500mm?

    Edit: Voodoo Zombie 500. I think I'll try it out. Looks like they're pretty cheap at $70.
    Edit 2: Holy crap. 3.5lbs. I think I'll try to find an old Niner 490mm fork.
    Last edited by p nut; 11-01-2011 at 10:53 AM.

  54. #454
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Myers005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    105
    Very cool you guys are running rigid, but I can see where the fork length would be an issue. I rode my other bikes rigid until August, and then my 49 y/o shoulders let me know that was enough, so back to suspension for me. As my dad says, getting old isn't for wimps

  55. #455
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    290
    I posted my N9 with the zombie 500 a few pages back. I went with rigid fork because I was impatient, couldnt afford a squishy fork at the time and figured it'd approximate the geo of a sagged 120mm fork. I now have a reba up front set at 100mm and am thrilled with the change. I am on the small end of rider size for the medium frame and the z500 raised the front end a bit too much. I'll likely experiment with 120mm but my gut tells me 100mm is the sweet spot for me.
    Spam: I've got a voodoo zombie fork for sale. Steerer is cut pretty short though (185mm IIRC). Pm me for details if interested.

  56. #456
    hispanic mechanic
    Reputation: sslos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,480
    Quote Originally Posted by p nut View Post
    Ha! I rode last week on a Cromoto Grande while my Reba was getting rebuilt and lengthened to 100mm. I liked the rigid ride. But I do agree the fork needs to be longer. I was getting the same amount of pedal strikes as with an 80mm fork. Anyone know of any steel fork options that are ~500mm?

    Edit: Voodoo Zombie 500. I think I'll try it out. Looks like they're pretty cheap at $70.
    Edit 2: Holy crap. 3.5lbs. I think I'll try to find an old Niner 490mm fork.
    If you don't mind waiting a bit, White Bros. will have a Rock Solid available in a 495mm length. Not cheap, but pretty darn light.

    Los
    Whiskey is my yoga.

    dongerparty.com

  57. #457
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    That looks like Lake Hodges to me sir!

  58. #458
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565

    Canfield N9 Sizing

    Arghh! Is anybody here have a Large frame and about 5'10" to 6'? Mediums out of stock! My last 29er was an 18" Jabberwocky and the ETT is the same is the Large N9. I'm gonna slap my Vassago ODIS on it.

  59. #459
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    Sweet bike osty, is that a Large?

  60. #460
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    I'll be straight up with you chestercospinner, you are one cheap m#$f#$ker. In my opinion Canfield MSRP is a great price already. $250 cheaper than an SIR 9 and does the same job without an EBB.

  61. #461
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by mtbnachos View Post
    Sweet bike osty, is that a Large?
    Yea, it's a large. I am somwhere between 6'-6'1".
    If you're under 6' the satndover may be alittle high for you.
    Great frame though and I punish the hell out of it

  62. #462
    .......
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,707
    Quote Originally Posted by mtbnachos View Post
    Arghh! Is anybody here have a Large frame and about 5'10" to 6'? Mediums out of stock! My last 29er was an 18" Jabberwocky and the ETT is the same is the Large N9. I'm gonna slap my Vassago ODIS on it.
    You may want a large N9 if you liked the 18" Jabber. I had a 18" Jabber and it felt a touch too long for me. (I'm 5' 11"). I got on a Large N9 and I think it felt even a tiny bit shorter than my old 18" Jabber. Stand over was no problem for me, and really should be secondary to ETT fit anyway.

    Also, rethink the Odis fork. I had pedal strike problems with a Salsa Cromoto Grande, which I believe is slightly longer than the Odis.

  63. #463
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    454
    anyone looking to sell a medium frame?

    Canfield is out of medium nimble9's - looking to pick one up. Prefer green ,but I'll take anything. PM me if you are looking to off-load!

  64. #464
    aka baycat
    Reputation: Ryan G.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,484
    Never mind

  65. #465
    Jacob 34:19
    Reputation: JAKEtheDOG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    495


    The Nimble 9 almost got by me. I'd seen a couple threads but dismissed it as a long travel HT or AM bike which really didn't sound at all appealing given my local terrain here in north Texas. Then for some reason, it caught my eye again and I decided to call Canfield. Had a great conversation with Chris and realized right away these guys are very passionate about these bikes. It also sounded like the geometry of this frame may not be as out of place as I thought so I decided to give it a shot.

    Just got this one built up last week. The frame showed up on time and ready to build. I was very impressed with the finish and prep which only added to the stoke. The build went together quick and easy. I've got some tweaks to do and the wheels are borrowed from other bikes but I'm already getting the feeling I'm really going to like this bike. Much of what's already been written I've found to be true. The Nimble 9 climbs really well, handles the twists like a dream, and the ride is surprisingly smooth. I think I'm going to get along quite well with this bike. It's certainly aptly named. Nimble it is.

    There are some downsides, if you can call them that. I intended to run my White Industries cranks and wheels but there was no way, no how I was going to get a 47.5mm chain line to work on this bike. On the upside, the 180mm Shimano cranks are working just fine (one spacer on the drive side). Though my heals have already marked up the chain and seat stays. The bike has considerably more wheel flop than I'm used to. This is compared to the other 29er's I've owned (Sir9, One9, Air9, Dean Ti Colonel, Karate Monkey, and Blackbuck) but it hasn't proven to be an issue on the trail. The set-up is directly off my last build so it's certainly not optimized for the geometry of this frame. I'll likely lower the bars a bit and possibly move to a shorter stem/ wider bar.

    If you're used to traditional XC geometry, this bike does require some adjustments to your riding style. At least it did for me but after only about 20 miles of varied terrain, I'm already starting to gel with it. And it's not even dialed in yet. If you're looking to add something to the stable with a bit slacker angles and uber short stays, you should take a strong look at a Nimble 9. It's worth every penny the Canfield boys are asking.

    *Sorry for the low quality cell pictures. The time change had me on the trail a bit later than I expected today.






  66. #466
    bottom dweller
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    90
    hey Jake, do you mind describing what you mean by "wheel flop"?

    also do you think that's something intrinsic to this frame or could it be improved when you have your set up "optimized" as you said you plan to do.

    I'm considering this frame for a SS and am close to pulling the trigger, just wanted to hear what your issue was.

    and if you don't mind could you post the size frame compared to your height and inseam?
    thanks!
    "What's the use of a fine house if you haven't got a tolerable planet to put it on?" ~Thoreau

  67. #467
    trail rat
    Reputation: slocaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    7,814
    Quote Originally Posted by unezridr View Post
    hey Jake, do you mind describing what you mean by "wheel flop"?

    also do you think that's something intrinsic to this frame or could it be improved when you have your set up "optimized" as you said you plan to do.

    I'm considering this frame for a SS and am close to pulling the trigger, just wanted to hear what your issue was.

    and if you don't mind could you post the size frame compared to your height and inseam?
    thanks!
    Geometry of Bike Handling

    Lots more......

    Let me google that for you

    "The physician heals, Nature makes well" - real fortune cookie

    CCCMB trail work for trail access - SLO, CA

  68. #468
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    Thanks for the info p_nut, my Jabber had a short Sunline 80mm stem and that dialed in well. I'm going for Large! Can't wait to get this frame.

  69. #469
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    Awesome bike nativeson, like the subtle touches that go along with it. I got an ODIS fork myself, how did it feel on the N9? Pros and cons...

  70. #470
    Jacob 34:19
    Reputation: JAKEtheDOG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    495
    Quote Originally Posted by unezridr View Post
    hey Jake, do you mind describing what you mean by "wheel flop"?

    also do you think that's something intrinsic to this frame or could it be improved when you have your set up "optimized" as you said you plan to do.

    I'm considering this frame for a SS and am close to pulling the trigger, just wanted to hear what your issue was.

    and if you don't mind could you post the size frame compared to your height and inseam?
    thanks!
    No problem. I should probably start off with the sizing and set-up to qualify the ride characteristics I'm finding. The frame is a size large and the fork is set to 100mm. Cranks are 180mm, stem is 110mm with 5º rise, and bars are Groovy Luv Handles. I'm 6'2" with a 34.25" inseam. The fit is dang near spot on.

    By wheel flop, I mean simply the front wheel tends to turn (or "flop") from side to side very easily with less of a tendency to self correct at low speeds. This is very noticeable when riding with no hands. It takes a bit more balance to keep the bike headed straight than my bikes with steeper HTA's. I think a 51mm offset fork would be just the ticket for this frame. On the trail, I guess I felt like I needed to be a bit more on top of the steering but it certainly hasn't been a problem. There is a bit of wander on slow grinding climbs but part of that is also due to the stem and bars I'm running which leads to...

    Set-up. The HT on this frame is a bit longer than the Blackbuck or Sir9 frames I was on before (and pulled the components from). As a result, the front end is a bit higher and my bars have ended up slightly above my saddle. Once I've had more saddle time and figure out exactly where things need to be, I'll likely replace this stem with something with less rise or maybe shorter as well with wider bars. Regardless, my hand position needs to come down which will also settle down the front end.

    The other tweak I'm considering is shorter cranks. So far, the 180's haven't been an issue but I'm tempted to move to 175's or even 170's. If I do, that will also raise the seat and may negate any necessary changes with the cockpit.

    To be clear, I'm not displeased in anyway with the way this bike rides, even as is. It's different enough from anything I've had before that an adjustment period is to be expected. At this point, I'm pretty stoked.
    Last edited by JAKEtheDOG; 11-07-2011 at 09:11 PM.

  71. #471
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    I'm 5'11.5" yet the ETT is right on the money if I get a Large. I think I am going Large just for that purpose and can deal with high standover.

  72. #472
    bottom dweller
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    90

    Lmgtfu

    Quote Originally Posted by slocaus View Post
    THANKS BRO!!

    I'm quite capable of and had already "googled that" for myself.

    I wanted to get the user's impression, that's why I asked him "what [he] meant by wheel flop"

    I find that not infrequently here, and on other forums, people use terms somewhat indiscriminately. One persons' "technical" trail, may not be so to another, etc. Thus my question.

    Thanks for your help!
    "What's the use of a fine house if you haven't got a tolerable planet to put it on?" ~Thoreau

  73. #473
    Ariolimax columbianus
    Reputation: nativeson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,300
    Quote Originally Posted by mtbnachos View Post
    Awesome bike nativeson, like the subtle touches that go along with it. I got an ODIS fork myself, how did it feel on the N9? Pros and cons...
    i guess the fork's a bit short but as long as you keep it in mind when you know you'll get pedal strikes and keep the cranks level to the ground you're good. i guess i'm pretty aware of lower bottom bracket bike having own two gen1 sc vpp bikes. haven't ridden it with a suspension fork so i wouldn't know anything else at the moment.

    rode the other day and followed a buddy on a gen1 blur down a rain packed buff trail and was suckin his rear wheel for the most part. the bike felt like it was on rails and the big wheels just kept rollin when he had to keep pedalin on the shorter uphill sections where i could just keep momentum and keep flowin. feels like a rocket and i'm gonna keep sayin that it steers awesome with your hips. definitely gonna get a fox fork in the future but i just love the low maintenance of a rigid bike.

  74. #474
    trail rat
    Reputation: slocaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    7,814
    Quote Originally Posted by unezridr View Post
    THANKS BRO!!

    I'm quite capable of and had already "googled that" for myself.

    I wanted to get the user's impression, that's why I asked him "what [he] meant by wheel flop"

    I find that not infrequently here, and on other forums, people use terms somewhat indiscriminately. One persons' "technical" trail, may not be so to another, etc. Thus my question.

    Thanks for your help!
    Good point about user definitions varying.

    I'm always good for smartazz help, just let me know when you need more.
    "The physician heals, Nature makes well" - real fortune cookie

    CCCMB trail work for trail access - SLO, CA

  75. #475
    .......
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,707
    Snow Nimble.



    Time to hang her up for the season... Good thing my new skis just arrived.

  76. #476
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    28
    Here is mine. I would like better wheels but this is what I had for now. So far I like!
    Last edited by burritobeau; 11-10-2011 at 04:28 AM.

  77. #477
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Lumbee1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,909
    Quote Originally Posted by JAKEtheDOG View Post
    No problem. I should probably start off with the sizing and set-up to qualify the ride characteristics I'm finding. The frame is a size large and the fork is set to 100mm. Cranks are 180mm, stem is 110mm with 5º rise, and bars are Groovy Luv Handles. I'm 6'2" with a 34.25" inseam. The fit is dang near spot on.

    By wheel flop, I mean simply the front wheel tends to turn (or "flop") from side to side very easily with less of a tendency to self correct at low speeds. This is very noticeable when riding with no hands. It takes a bit more balance to keep the bike headed straight than my bikes with steeper HTA's. I think a 51mm offset fork would be just the ticket for this frame. On the trail, I guess I felt like I needed to be a bit more on top of the steering but it certainly hasn't been a problem. There is a bit of wander on slow grinding climbs but part of that is also due to the stem and bars I'm running which leads to...

    Set-up. The HT on this frame is a bit longer than the Blackbuck or Sir9 frames I was on before (and pulled the components from). As a result, the front end is a bit higher and my bars have ended up slightly above my saddle. Once I've had more saddle time and figure out exactly where things need to be, I'll likely replace this stem with something with less rise or maybe shorter as well with wider bars. Regardless, my hand position needs to come down which will also settle down the front end.

    The other tweak I'm considering is shorter cranks. So far, the 180's haven't been an issue but I'm tempted to move to 175's or even 170's. If I do, that will also raise the seat and may negate any necessary changes with the cockpit.

    To be clear, I'm not displeased in anyway with the way this bike rides, even as is. It's different enough from anything I've had before that an adjustment period is to be expected. At this point, I'm pretty stoked.
    Hey Jake, we are almost identical in height and inseam (6'2" and 34" inseam). I currently have a SS Karate Monkey with a Waltworks fork. I love the bike but I really would like to try something that is a little taller in the front with shorter chainstays. With the Monkey and the rear wheel pushed all the way forward, sometimes the front end would get very light. Have you noticed this with the Nimble9? What are the major differences in the ride between the Monkey and the N9?

  78. #478
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    264
    [QUOTE=sslos;8267661]<table style="width:auto;"><tr><td><a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/71FJ8byXLIdkdaTVCjyhrcqGViO3W2zqb0Fy6FYMtpM?feat=e mbedwebsite"><img src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-Tk13PzrVq4k/TimzKPLXwDI/AAAAAAAAAGs/Zd9s8G2tI2I/s144/IMAG0300.jpg" height="96" width="144" /></a></td></tr><tr><td style="font-family:arial,sans-serif; font-size:11px; text-align:right">From <a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/1speedlos/DropBox?authuser=0&authkey=Gv1sRgCLn8hMD38-DYWw&feat=embedwebsite">Drop Box</a></td></tr></table>
    Outside the condo where we're staying in Sun Valley.
    Word of warning if anyone is planning on using a White Industries crank: I ended up needing a 122mm BB for it in order to clear the driveside chainstay. Probably the same for most other square taper cranks, too. A 115 worked fine on the Unit.
    As far as the geometry, it feels more playful, and definitely easier to pop the front up over stuff... even in flip-flops!

    Fine looking bike. Good photo..iPhone 3g or 4?
    I like big bars and I cannot lie

  79. #479
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    926
    XL size will be available for 2012....I'm interested

  80. #480
    Jacob 34:19
    Reputation: JAKEtheDOG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    495
    Quote Originally Posted by Lumbee1 View Post
    Hey Jake, we are almost identical in height and inseam (6'2" and 34" inseam). I currently have a SS Karate Monkey with a Waltworks fork. I love the bike but I really would like to try something that is a little taller in the front with shorter chainstays. With the Monkey and the rear wheel pushed all the way forward, sometimes the front end would get very light. Have you noticed this with the Nimble9? What are the major differences in the ride between the Monkey and the N9?
    The front end of my N9 feels a touch light but I think there's two things contributing to that. First is I currently have the bars slightly above my saddle (about a half inch). Typically I would run them even or slightly lower and intend to make this adjustment. Second is the more slack head tube makes the bike steer a bit easier. The lighter steering contributes to the "feel" of a lighter front end but I don't feel like it's losing traction.

    I actually love the way my Monkey rode. I'd say other than the differences you've already noted, the only other thing that stands out to me is how much smoother the N9 is. I found my Monkey and Blackbuck to both be pretty harsh. The N9 is definitely closer to the Sir9 but stiffer in the BB area. Maybe it's a combination of the slack angles and Ti post or maybe the curved says actually do provide some compliance, I don't know. But the N9 really does have a great ride none the less.

  81. #481
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    Thanks osty. I ordered the Large and will arrive in a couple days so I'm picturing the build in my mind already. I do like your 1x9 setup, what chain guide are you using? I have N-Gear jumpstop but exploring other options. Is your derailleur a medium cage?

  82. #482
    hispanic mechanic
    Reputation: sslos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,480
    Quote Originally Posted by jimx200 View Post

    Fine looking bike. Good photo..iPhone 3g or 4?
    Thanks, it was actually taken with an HTC Eris. I've since changed to an iPhone 4, which is much better.

    Los
    Whiskey is my yoga.

    dongerparty.com

  83. #483
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    Agreed for now I'm sticking the ODIS but when I can afford it I will be putting on a 120 Fox Talas.

  84. #484
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bobbotron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,305
    Quote Originally Posted by JAKEtheDOG View Post
    No problem. I should probably start off with the sizing and set-up to qualify the ride characteristics I'm finding. The frame is a size large and the fork is set to 100mm. Cranks are 180mm, stem is 110mm with 5º rise, and bars are Groovy Luv Handles. I'm 6'2" with a 34.25" inseam. The fit is dang near spot on.

    By wheel flop, I mean simply the front wheel tends to turn (or "flop") from side to side very easily with less of a tendency to self correct at low speeds. This is very noticeable when riding with no hands. It takes a bit more balance to keep the bike headed straight than my bikes with steeper HTA's. I think a 51mm offset fork would be just the ticket for this frame. On the trail, I guess I felt like I needed to be a bit more on top of the steering but it certainly hasn't been a problem. There is a bit of wander on slow grinding climbs but part of that is also due to the stem and bars I'm running which leads to...

    Set-up. The HT on this frame is a bit longer than the Blackbuck or Sir9 frames I was on before (and pulled the components from). As a result, the front end is a bit higher and my bars have ended up slightly above my saddle. Once I've had more saddle time and figure out exactly where things need to be, I'll likely replace this stem with something with less rise or maybe shorter as well with wider bars. Regardless, my hand position needs to come down which will also settle down the front end.

    The other tweak I'm considering is shorter cranks. So far, the 180's haven't been an issue but I'm tempted to move to 175's or even 170's. If I do, that will also raise the seat and may negate any necessary changes with the cockpit.

    To be clear, I'm not displeased in anyway with the way this bike rides, even as is. It's different enough from anything I've had before that an adjustment period is to be expected. At this point, I'm pretty stoked.
    That's super interesting - I haven't had the pleasure to ride a slacker bike like this in forever, so I've forgotten what it's like. I thought a slacker HT angle was supposed to give you slower, more confident steering? What do you find to be the benefits of the slacker HT?

  85. #485
    30-ton War Machine
    Reputation: edgerat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    794
    This is one of those tricky fitting frames. I typically ride a small-size Niner or, medium-sized 26ers. I typically feel most comfy around 23" ETT. I am 5'6" with a 28" inseam and a 69cm bb-saddle height. Anyone have any thoughts on this? I am running a Reba 120 RLT, may knock it down to 100mm. I have an Eriksen setback post I can use. For some reason I am just a bit terrified of getting the wrong size This frame seems to bring that out in folks!
    Isaac

  86. #486
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Myers005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by edgerat View Post
    This is one of those tricky fitting frames. I typically ride a small-size Niner or, medium-sized 26ers. I typically feel most comfy around 23" ETT. I am 5'6" with a 28" inseam and a 69cm bb-saddle height. Anyone have any thoughts on this? I am running a Reba 120 RLT, may knock it down to 100mm. I have an Eriksen setback post I can use. For some reason I am just a bit terrified of getting the wrong size This frame seems to bring that out in folks!
    Isaac
    Hmm, we're about the same height, I might have a bit longer legs. I'm ok with the top tube length on my small Nimble 9 (photo at top of page); for comparison I also have a small One 9 and was very comfy running a 100mm stem with 100mm Reba (since dropped to 90mm stem and 80mm shock which is a bit more upright but feels fine). The Nimble 9 is definitely more upright, but I'm fine with the setback seat post. FWIW, I'd think the medium N9 would be a bit too tall for you (stand over is less on my small N9 than on my small One 9).

  87. #487
    Jacob 34:19
    Reputation: JAKEtheDOG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    495
    Quote Originally Posted by bobbotron View Post
    That's super interesting - I haven't had the pleasure to ride a slacker bike like this in forever, so I've forgotten what it's like. I thought a slacker HT angle was supposed to give you slower, more confident steering? What do you find to be the benefits of the slacker HT?
    Slower, more controlled at speed. Killer for bombing down hill. A little light feeling in the slow, grinding, techy climbs but certainly not an issue.

    One of the great things about this frame is it works well with 80mm, 100mm, or 120mm forks. 100mm is a great compromise for the relatively flat trails we have here in N Texas. Slack enough to make the down hills fun without too many pedal strikes and still manageable on the climbs. If I were setting it up for pure XC/race I'd use an 80mm fork or equivalent A-C rigid fork. If I lived somewhere with hills and possessed the ability fly down them, I'd probably set it up with a 120mm fork. Chris Canfield said he feels that's the sweet spot for this frame and I would imagine that to be the case for their trails...and his skill level.

  88. #488
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    544
    I would agree with Myers, I'm about 5'-8 1/2" w/ a 30" inseam. I was riding a small Jabber and went with a medium N9 w/ a 65mm stem(approx the same ETT) , the cockpit feels like it was designed for me. My 2 cents is a small frame would be a better fit and play around with stem lengths. Also, my 100mm F29 feels really good on this frame a lot different than the sharper headtube of the Canzo it was formally on.
    Good luck with the build and be sure to post up pics when it's complete!

  89. #489
    Uncle
    Reputation: Entrenador's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    3,990

    ETT on size L confirmation please

    Hey all. If you have a large set up with a 100mm fork, please clear up the geo. vs. spec. listings and post your "effective top tube" length. Rep points for the same at 120mm.
    Every rose has it's thorn.

    enjoy the ear worm

  90. #490
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    19
    Very nice looking!

  91. #491
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565

    Ok time to get this pahtay started!

    Christmas arrived super early for me. Build will be Stay tuned my fellow riders.......
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Canfield Nimble 9 build thread!-canfield-1.jpg  


  92. #492
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    926
    Quote Originally Posted by mtbnachos View Post
    Christmas arrived super early for me. Build will be Stay tuned my fellow riders.......
    Even the carton is cool, congrats

  93. #493
    the mountian is within
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by Entrenador View Post
    Hey all. If you have a large set up with a 100mm fork, please clear up the geo. vs. spec. listings and post your "effective top tube" length. Rep points for the same at 120mm.
    I have a large with a 120mm Manitiou...I get 24in...I wish it was .5 more-but it still rocks!!
    i own a bikeshop in WV thetruewheelwv.com

  94. #494
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    544
    Quote Originally Posted by mtbnachos View Post
    Christmas arrived super early for me. Build will be Stay tuned my fellow riders.......
    Sweet! Don't forget to look in the box for the huge sheet of stickers! Nice little touch

  95. #495
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    229
    VERY interested in an XL size. I'm not sure I can wait til the 2012's are available and may go with the Kona Honzo.

  96. #496
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    Yeah I got the stickies, wonder if they are replacements if the black decals come off.

  97. #497
    Gigantic Hawk
    Reputation: dubthang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,395
    Quote Originally Posted by mtbnachos View Post
    Yeah I got the stickies, wonder if they are replacements if the black decals come off.
    I've been using the small stickers to cover up the spots were I've removed the paint. I used some of the clear stickers to prevent cable rub, and I placed the large ones on the front legs of my Niner fork to help prevent chips.
    new jerseys and tech t's
    made to order in the USA from premium recycled poly - men's and women's in all sizes

  98. #498
    Uncle
    Reputation: Entrenador's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    3,990
    Quote Originally Posted by 29buzz View Post
    I have a large with a 120mm Manitiou...I get 24in...I wish it was .5 more-but it still rocks!!
    Ah, much appreciated, 29buzz. At 24" even, it's in my wheelhouse! Reduce the fork to 110 or 100, and I'm even closer [insert sound of grey matter gears turning here].
    Every rose has it's thorn.

    enjoy the ear worm

  99. #499
    Canfield Brothers
    Reputation: flymybike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,097
    Quote Originally Posted by Entrenador View Post
    Hey all. If you have a large set up with a 100mm fork, please clear up the geo. vs. spec. listings and post your "effective top tube" length. Rep points for the same at 120mm.
    My personal bike is a large with a fox 100mm fork. From HT top center to seat post center measured horizontal is 24". On the geo print it shows 24.2", that is assuming you have your seat up at full extension. So as you lower your seat it gets 0.2" shorter down to horizontal. If you run a 120 fork it gets slightly shorter but it can easily compinsated with the saddle.
    http://www.canfieldbrothers.com/frames
    Building bikes that make you smile!
    www.mtbparks.com
    All Bike Park, All the time.

  100. #500
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    565
    I see, I see. I'll stash them somewhere safe. On to my build......

Page 5 of 21 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Jones steel diamond frame or Canfield Nimble 9
    By Clink in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 11-02-2012, 10:27 PM
  2. Canfield Nimble 9?
    By Professor in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 254
    Last Post: 09-23-2011, 08:17 AM
  3. Canfield One - building thread
    By jetmotor in forum All Mountain
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 06-23-2010, 08:33 PM
  4. Canfield Bros Nimble Nine
    By Fly Rider in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-24-2010, 07:39 AM
  5. Canfield Nimble 9 29'er, get your pedal on!
    By pajak in forum Canfield
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-17-2009, 06:10 PM

Members who have read this thread: 99

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •