Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: Alchemy 29er!

  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Just J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,930

    Alchemy 29er!

    Have you guys seen this?!

    https://instagram.com/p/Bht3DZvHWzM/

    It's a bike that I've been waiting for ever since seeing the Arktos in the flesh and hope it's sporting some en vogue geometry when details are released...

  2. #2
    Out spokin'
    Reputation: Sparticus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Posts
    8,458
    Yo J! Nope, hadn't seen it before... and still can't really say I've seen it. Followed your link to a couple shots that didn't show much beyond an awesome frame finish. Got details &/or more photos? What intrigued you upon your first exposure to the bike? I'm totally unfamiliar.
    =sParty
    disciplesofdirt.org

    We don't quit riding because we get old.
    We get old because we quit riding.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Just J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,930
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparticus View Post
    Yo J! Nope, hadn't seen it before... and still can't really say I've seen it. Followed your link to a couple shots that didn't show much beyond an awesome frame finish. Got details &/or more photos? What intrigued you upon your first exposure to the bike? I'm totally unfamiliar.
    =sParty
    Hey SParty!

    I’ve not seen this one in the flesh yet, this is as much as I’ve seen apart from this too:



    My first exposure to Alchemy in real life though was checking out an all black Arktos 27.5, the finish was amazing and I’ve heard nothing but good things of them.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Just J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,930

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Just J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,930





  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Just J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,930

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,417
    Superboost, nice.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Just J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,930
    Looks like a nice bike, I also like the way they're embracing Superboost too, but the geometry looks a bit normally to me, nothing new, although I'm sure it rides very nicely. I like the higher than trendy bottom bracket.

    I heard today that it looks like Alchemy are possibly going to the direct sales route, which actually puts me off given that I'd prefer to put my trust in my local dealer who were stocking their bikes.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,417
    Yeah, the new crop of bikes seems to have found a middle ground, not as much change, which is good for the consumer as it means the older bikes are not getting dated quite so fast.

    Quote Originally Posted by Just J View Post
    Looks like a nice bike, I also like the way they're embracing Superboost too, but the geometry looks a bit normally to me, nothing new, although I'm sure it rides very nicely. I like the higher than trendy bottom bracket.

    I heard today that it looks like Alchemy are possibly going to the direct sales route, which actually puts me off given that I'd prefer to put my trust in my local dealer who were stocking their bikes.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Just J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,930
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    Yeah, the new crop of bikes seems to have found a middle ground, not as much change, which is good for the consumer as it means the older bikes are not getting dated quite so fast.
    But I would argue that the numbers on this one could be pre-change. You know, long seat tube, higher B.B. (good thing in my book), normal reach and higher stack height. Either way I bet it works!

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    1,416
    The stack numbers are very high.

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  12. #12
    I'm with stupid
    Reputation: hitechredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,645
    Quote Originally Posted by bogeydog View Post
    The stack numbers are very high.

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
    Not everyone want to ride a mountain bike bent over like a road bike. At 6'1" with long legs I have never owned a bike that my seat was not already at least 3" over the bars. Now with the trend of super low stack heights it is worse.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: smithcreek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by hitechredneck View Post
    Not everyone want to ride a mountain bike bent over like a road bike. At 6'1" with long legs I have never owned a bike that my seat was not already at least 3" over the bars. Now with the trend of super low stack heights it is worse.
    I'm with you, 6'-1" with 35.5" inseam. XL legs with a Medium torso! I bought an Evil Wreckoning recently and it's the first bike I've ever owned with a stack height that works well when I'm seated.

  14. #14
    No Clue Crew
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,699
    The keyboard warriors here on MTBR will assure you that you can’t possibly be an “aggressive “ rider with a high stack. I generally assume they’re midgets or simply regurgitators of bad knowledge.

    Love me some stack height, man.
    Just like a raindrop, I was born to fall.

  15. #15
    Out spokin'
    Reputation: Sparticus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Posts
    8,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Blatant View Post
    The keyboard warriors here on MTBR will assure you that you can’t possibly be an “aggressive “ rider with a high stack. I generally assume they’re midgets or simply regurgitators of bad knowledge.

    Love me some stack height, man.
    Consider me a charter member of Club Stack Height! 6'2", 36" inseam and running 67mm of spacers under my stem (on a size large GG Pistola with a 5.5" head tube). Not to mention 20mm-ish riser bars as well. Wish the head tube was another inch or two longer on a frame this size.

    IMO & IME bars level with seat make for optimum flight control whether wheels are on the ground or anywhere above it.
    =sParty
    disciplesofdirt.org

    We don't quit riding because we get old.
    We get old because we quit riding.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    6,276
    Cool rear suspension design. Check.

    Not stupid-low BB. Check.

    Max rear tire of 2.4". Uhhh.

    Super-Boost. Uhhh again.

    Still, curious to see actual ride reviews. Always good to see guys like Alchemy, Spot, etc. shaking things up a bit.
    Whining is not a strategy.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,200
    Life time Waranty, 44mm offset Fox 36 fork, DXP2 rear shock, longer reach than my Spot Mayham with higher BB also. I'm cramped on my large 29er Mayham, going with new 9point8 25mm setback dropper seat post for final dial in. I'm 5'10 with short 31inseam legs but super long upper body. 75mm stem slammed all the way down with saddle all the way back.

    If I can't dial the Mayham in then the Dave Earle developed Sine suspension Arktos 29er it will be!! Frames are also built in the #1 factory for carbon frames and I trust Alchemy for their word!! Quality is off the chart. I will go frame only with the RS Lyrik fork at 42mm offset, red fork and gray large frame!!

  18. #18
    MTB B'dos
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    23,005
    I'm going to chime in on this despite knowing that I'll get chastised for speaking out, but, WTF 150 rear and then only clearance for a 2.5" tyre
    Other than that, geo is run of the mill, which isn't a bad thing as things were getting too long IMHO. Nice to see a proper size HT/Stack instead of those <5" tall HT on XL bikes we normally see. BB height is decent, at least not the stupid really low stuff most are doing, but could be higher for my taste.

    J, you really do need to seek some counseling, you have a serious "problem", but there are worse, know you make me not feel so bad for getting new bike itch after 4 years
    One day your life will flash before your eyes, will it be worth watching??

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    6,276
    Quote Originally Posted by dgw7000 View Post
    I'm 5'10 with short 31inseam legs but super long upper body.
    Welcome to my world. I'm 6'2" with a 31.25" inseam!
    Whining is not a strategy.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Just J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,930
    Quote Originally Posted by LyNx View Post
    I'm going to chime in on this despite knowing that I'll get chastised for speaking out, but, WTF 150 rear and then only clearance for a 2.5" tyre
    Other than that, geo is run of the mill, which isn't a bad thing as things were getting too long IMHO. Nice to see a proper size HT/Stack instead of those <5" tall HT on XL bikes we normally see. BB height is decent, at least not the stupid really low stuff most are doing, but could be higher for my taste.

    J, you really do need to seek some counseling, you have a serious "problem", but there are worse, know you make me not feel so bad for getting new bike itch after 4 years
    Ha ha I don’t have a new bike itch, which is strange for me seeing as I usually have one once every 3 months!!

    The tyre clearance and the lack of a bottle mount turned me off the Arktos 29, once I sat down and thought about it some more , the geometry is very close to what I’d find ideal though so I agree with you there.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,294
    Quote Originally Posted by LyNx View Post
    I'm going to chime in on this despite knowing that I'll get chastised for speaking out, but, WTF 150 rear and then only clearance for a 2.5" tyre
    Other than that, geo is run of the mill, which isn't a bad thing as things were getting too long IMHO. Nice to see a proper size HT/Stack instead of those <5" tall HT on XL bikes we normally see. BB height is decent, at least not the stupid really low stuff most are doing, but could be higher for my taste.

    J, you really do need to seek some counseling, you have a serious "problem", but there are worse, know you make me not feel so bad for getting new bike itch after 4 years
    I think the geo looks great, compared to a lot of bikes these day. Not to long or low. 2.5 is enough for me especially with 150mm travel.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: David R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,861
    To me the Large looks like a M frame with an XL seat tube, I chuckled when I saw an article describing it as "modern geometry", journalists and their buzzwords...

    Interesting to see another trailbike with the 157 rear end, but I honestly can't see a single reason to buy this over the Ibis Ripmo if you're in the market for a 160/140 29er that isn't a slacked-out endurobro racer. Unless perhaps you've got really long legs and a short upper body?

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Just J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,930
    Quote Originally Posted by David R View Post
    To me the Large looks like a M frame with an XL seat tube, I chuckled when I saw an article describing it as "modern geometry", journalists and their buzzwords...

    Interesting to see another trailbike with the 157 rear end, but I honestly can't see a single reason to buy this over the Ibis Ripmo if you're in the market for a 160/140 29er that isn't a slacked-out endurobro racer. Unless perhaps you've got really long legs and a short upper body?
    True, I look at that seat tube and wonder why too?!

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    52
    Side shots from the website. Good looking pieces of machinery.

    https://alchemybicycles.com/arktos29



    Alchemy 29er!-product-shot.jpg

    Alchemy 29er!-product-shot.jpg

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    11
    Any one ride one yet. I love the looks just not sure how it compares to the ripmo and htlt

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,963
    I was one of the first to be drawn to the 27.5 Arktos but could not make the run to 27.5. This one looks interesting...the geo seems to be new but not radical. Will have to see how it rides. I like the not-too-low BB but I'd still prefer slightly higher with that travel. The seat tube angle is okay...maybe another half steeper would work better on climbs but hard to say till you ride it.

    I have not been buying new bikes at the rate I did (2 each year, and rotating) primarily since they started to drop the BB heights. I like the looks and will eventually replace my Yeti 4.5 29er for a bike that climbs as well, but maybe has a touch more travel, slightly shorter CS, and a higher BB at sag.

Similar Threads

  1. Alchemy Stainless Steel 29er
    By Lowjack in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-04-2013, 10:17 AM
  2. Fegley's Brew Works Arctic Alchemy
    By JFryauff in forum Beer Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-25-2012, 01:38 PM
  3. Alchemy & Science first market release
    By JFryauff in forum Beer Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-04-2012, 03:47 PM
  4. Alchemy & Science take Angel City under their wing
    By JFryauff in forum Beer Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-13-2012, 02:58 PM
  5. Boston backed "Alchemy & Science"
    By JFryauff in forum Beer Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-02-2011, 08:05 PM

Members who have read this thread: 264

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

mtbr.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.