Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 66
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    15

    Are 29ers just tall people bikes?

    Hi,

    I am 5' 7'' and wish to get into mountain biking. I am use to 26 inch wheel bikes, and these 29ers look like giganto mountain people bikes.

    How many are out there using 29ers that are 5' 8'' and under and weight less than 160 pounds?

  2. #2
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,395
    Quote Originally Posted by elbowtko View Post
    Hi,

    I am 5' 7'' and wish to get into mountain biking. I am use to 26 inch wheel bikes, and these 29ers look like giganto mountain people bikes.

    How many are out there using 29ers that are 5' 8'' and under and weight less than 160 pounds?
    My wife likes her 29er & she is 5'3
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  3. #3
    cowbell
    Reputation: Cotharyus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,895
    My wife, and at least one other wife of one of the guys in the group I ride with both fit (easily) into your size category and ride 29ers. I don't think a 29er being the "right bike" has anything to do with size at all. I think it's all about what you are comfortable on, and what you can handle. I know a guy my size who rides a 26er because he can't make a 29er turn, but I can get on either of my 29ers and stick right with him. It's all about personal preference, and nothing to do with size.

  4. #4
    Dudette
    Reputation: petey15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,364
    I'm 5'4" and rock two 29ers! Misfit Dissent and Trance X 29er. I agree with Cotharyus 100% - I'm riding trails now that I had the worst time on my 26" bike but my 29er seems to take right to them. And I'm not just talking about going over stuff - I'm talking about twists and turns, too. The bikes just feel "right" to me. Not all of them are huge and there are more and more companies out there who are addressing the needs of smaller riders and making it possible for them to enjoy the benefits of 29ers, too. You won't know until you try, so get out there and demo some if you get the chance!

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    318
    I.m 5'5" and built up a 29er last spring. I have only rode my 26er one time since then. I love the 29er and am glad I never bought into the hype 29ers are for taller people. I find a 29er to fit my needs so much better. Different strokes for different folks, try some out to see if you like them.

  6. #6
    San Miguel Beer Drinker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    314
    im 5'7" and i use a medium xtc 29er.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kingdom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    75
    Noo! Im 5'8/9'' and have sold all the 26'' bikes and gone for 29ers.
    I will not be going back.. ever.

    Canfield Yelli Screamy. 180' on a slab. - YouTube

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    26
    5'9 with a 17.5" 29er that rides quite nicely if I may say so.

  9. #9
    dru
    dru is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,443
    I'm a very tall guy at 6'5". I have both frame sizes. There is no difference in performance from one to the other just because 29ers 'supposedly' fit tall people better. The bigger wheels aestheically look better, no doubt about it, but that's about it.

    Very small folks will have issues with the 29er on several fronts.
    1: The front ends can only be made so low.
    2: Standover clearance can ony be made so low because of the high front end.
    3: TT length can be ony so short otherwise toe overlap issues occur.


    Drew
    occasional cyclist

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Rowntree55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Muddy Dawg View Post
    5'9 with a 17.5" 29er that rides quite nicely if I may say so.
    Same stats for me. I have the stock seat post at the lowest possible position and it fits perfect. So any smaller would probably have to go to a 15.5"

    I think once you get used to it, the 29er looking like mountain people bikes will quickly change to 26" looking like little people bikes. (not saying anything bad about either, just a perception change after getting used to my bike)

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    16
    173cm and Medium 29er Anthem X, lovin' the big wheels!

  12. #12
    meh... whatever
    Reputation: monogod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    5,297
    5'7" is definitely not to short to rule out a 29er. just the opposite, in fact.

    people much shorter than you love and ride them too. speaking of which, a guy on here posted a picture of a blacksheep (iirc) frame some years ago that was either 12" or 13"!
    "Knowledge is good." ~ Emil Faber

  13. #13
    meh... whatever
    Reputation: monogod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    5,297
    Quote Originally Posted by dru View Post
    The bigger wheels aestheically look better, no doubt about it, but that's about it.
    i would respectfully disagree. there are many viable benefits to the 29" wheelsize over the 26". but as they've been covered ad infinitum on the board over several years there's no reason to repeat them here.
    "Knowledge is good." ~ Emil Faber

  14. #14
    Custom Wheelbuilder
    Reputation: Zen Cyclery's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    533
    In the early days of 29ers, they really were a tall guys bike. Nowadays though, most companies are starting to get geometry and whatnot dialed even in the small and medium size frames.
    I would say go for it. The bigger wheels are advantageous on almost all terrain except for extremely tight switchbacks which hopefully you don't have to deal with too much.
    Check out www.zencyclery.com for fully customizable, handbuilt wheels.

    www.facebook.com/zencyclerywheels

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    67
    I'm 5'8" 160 lbs and love my medium Anthem X 29er...haven't touched my old 26er since getting the big wheels

  16. #16
    dru
    dru is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,443
    Quote Originally Posted by monogod View Post
    i would respectfully disagree. there are many viable benefits to the 29" wheelsize over the 26". but as they've been covered ad infinitum on the board over several years there's no reason to repeat them here.
    Mono, I meant specifically with respect to tall people. I certainly agree with the benefits of the big wheels for people of any height.

    Drew
    occasional cyclist

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    289
    There is no interplay between height of rider and wheel size, within reason. Bottom bracket height, stand over height, and top tube length are the relevant measurements. All three are independent of wheel size, again within reason.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    28
    I`am 5` 6" and 145 lbs .. Use Scott Scale 950 small with no problem
    Scott scale 950 29er
    Cannondale F7 SS 32/18 26er

  19. #19
    Kitty! Kitty! Kitty!
    Reputation: GelatiCruiser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    1,080
    5'7" 180lbs. Just got my 1st 29er. It felt way different to me. I felt like I had a lower center of gravity, more control and had to work less to make the bike do more. I always felt like I had to sit really far back on a 26" so I didn't feel like I was going over the bars. This bike feels SO comfortable and for $600 was a great introductory bike into the 29er arena. Couldn't be happier.

  20. #20
    meh... whatever
    Reputation: monogod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    5,297

    huh?

    Quote Originally Posted by dru View Post
    Mono, I meant specifically with respect to tall people. I certainly agree with the benefits of the big wheels for people of any height.

    Drew
    so you're saying that specifically with respect to tall people the only advantage to 29er wheels is aesthetic while at the same time saying that big wheels benefit people of any height???

    i'm being confused here, not combative...
    "Knowledge is good." ~ Emil Faber

  21. #21
    dru
    dru is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,443
    Quote Originally Posted by monogod View Post
    so you're saying that specifically with respect to tall people the only advantage to 29er wheels is aesthetic while at the same time saying that big wheels benefit people of any height???

    i'm being confused here, not combative...
    Yes, aesthetics are the only specific benefit with respect to tallness.

    The 29er wheels help everyone regardless of height although smaller riders may have frame fit issues.

    I'm just trying to counteract B.S. statements like '29ers work better for taller riders', more than likely written by people who don't have a clue about being very tall and how that relates to fit and bike handling.

    Drew
    occasional cyclist

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    629
    Quote Originally Posted by dru View Post
    Yes, aesthetics are the only specific benefit with respect to tallness.

    The 29er wheels help everyone regardless of height although smaller riders may have frame fit issues.

    I'm just trying to counteract B.S. statements like '29ers work better for taller riders', more than likely written by people who don't have a clue about being very tall and how that relates to fit and bike handling.

    Drew
    I don't think he's contradicting himself. My understanding of his statement is that the 29ers look a little more physically appealing under a taller guy, since the bike is more proportional. Which leads some people to think its a better choice for the taller rider. Not the case at all. I've seen riders of all sizes benefit from 29 inch wheels...as he also said. Good to hear from the taller guys. I'm 6'1 and the bike genuinely feels like it fits me better...but most of the benefits come from the actual wheel size...not the size of the rider. Especially with so many manfuactures dialing in the geometry for the shorter riders.

  23. #23
    dru
    dru is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,443
    Thank you!
    occasional cyclist

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    779
    5' 6" and 160 - i sure hope they arent just for tall people, or all the fun and best mtb riding of my life in the last year was all charade!!

    Own an Anthem 29, and have recently demoed the Yeti and Satori - longer travel 29's - all i can say is the new crop of bikes I've ridden are amazing - even at my height!!

  25. #25
    meh... whatever
    Reputation: monogod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    5,297
    Quote Originally Posted by drz400sm View Post
    My understanding of his statement is that the 29ers look a little more physically appealing under a taller guy, since the bike is more proportional. Which leads some people to think its a better choice for the taller rider.
    ah... yes indeed. that makes much more sense. trackin with ya now, drew.

    i'm 6'3" and have had people say "of course you think 29er's are better, look how tall you are. 29er's are made for tall people, but it wouldn't work for a short person like me". which, of course, is nonsense.

    Quote Originally Posted by drz400sm
    Especially with so many manfuactures dialing in the geometry for the shorter riders.
    james at blacksheep made either a 12" or 13" 29er for a customer. it was on the board a few years back but i couldn't locate it.
    "Knowledge is good." ~ Emil Faber

  26. #26
    dru
    dru is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,443
    In the opposite vein, I get a fair bit of "shouldn't you get a 29er, because it would fit you better" despite the fact I am sitting on my custom framed 26er that fits identically to my 29er. (Actually, it fits just a bit better). I then tell the person that I have a 29er and like both sizes just fine.

    Drew
    occasional cyclist

  27. #27
    Ride On
    Reputation: geraldooka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    416
    5' 7" LOVE my small N9.
    Michael

    Ride on!

  28. #28
    turtles make me hot
    Reputation: NYrr496's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    7,226
    My daughter, who's 5'3" or 5'4" rides a 15" GF 29er.
    My sister in law, 5'6" rides a 15" hardtail, her friend, 5'5" with short legs rides a 13" and I'm currently building a Med Salsa Spearfish for my wife. 5'7" or 5'8" and we just checked standover tonight. It's perfect.
    I like turtles

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,374
    I think the benefits of 29ers apply to most any sized person.

    But if you're tall, some of the benefits of moving from 26er to 29er are even greater than for shorter people (fewer endos on steep, technical downhills, anybody?).

    Although I was a fairly early adopter of 29ers, I try not to be too evangelical about them. When friends ask about new bikes and 29ers, I generally recommend demoing one of each, with all aspects of the two bikes as equal as possible except wheel size.

    Once they choose a wheel size, then its time to get down to evaluating the different bikes available in their category of interest.

    But when friends over 6 feet tall ask the same question, I recommend just looking at 29ers. If nothing else, it makes the shopping less confusing!
    Whining is not a strategy.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    629
    Quote Originally Posted by monogod View Post

    i'm 6'3" and have had people say "of course you think 29er's are better, look how tall you are. 29er's are made for tall people, but it wouldn't work for a short person like me". which, of course, is
    It makes sense now riders get this idea embedded in their head...before I jumped on the 29er bandwagon I never once looked at a taller rider on a 26er and thought "those wheels look small" But after finally giving in and purchasing a 29er, i have seen some bigger guys ride past me and thought to myself that it looks unproportional. Of course, I understand the pro's and con's of each wheel size....but like dru said... It's a visual thing and can see why people assume its only for the 6 ft and up guys.

    Before I got a 29er I thought the same thing, and only because I had never actually ridden one. Now that I own both, it's obvious that each have their place in the mtb bike world. Ones not clearly better then the other. Some of my trails just handle a 26er better, and some favor the bigger wheels.

    I remember the exact situation about a year ago that totally changed my perception on the 29ers. One of our trails starts with a very steep and rooty climb, followed by a slow technical decent. I remember watching a shorter woman on a 29er start the climb before me and thought to myself...this lady is gonna have a hard time clearing the entire section. Boy did she prove me wrong. She kicked my @$$ from start to finish without taking a foot off the pedal...on my 5 inch trail bike I was constantly dealing with pedal strikes and "high centering" my frame (I guess that's what you'd call it?). She made this technical section look easy. After I got my 29er, I did the same section and was sold.

    Just goes to show that physical size makes no difference, and certain sections of a trail favor the bigger wheels for their ability to roll over obstacles with more confidence. Other sections favor the smaller more agile 26 inch wheels. I still rotate rotate between bikes depending on the actual trail...but I'm finding myself taking out my entry level 29er more often... And my $4,000 26incher is sitting collecting dust.

    Sorry for writing a book...im just sick of hearing guys talk down on 29ers before actually giving them a try. One ride will not convert you to the bigger wheels. I'd rather hear about the guy who dislikes his 29er after riding it for a few months or putting 100+ miles on it on several trails, and actually giving it a chance... Instead of the "Im too short for the wagon wheels" or "I demoed a 29er on a 5 mile loop and hated it." it's kinda like riding flats vs clipless.....you've gotta put in your time before making an honest unbiased opinions. There is a learning curve!

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slowrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    2,728

    Nope

    I'm 5'6" riding an intense tracer 29 and enjoying every minute of it.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Are 29ers just tall people bikes?-tracer-29.jpg  

    Last edited by slowrider; 10-15-2012 at 02:53 PM.

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    297
    Quote Originally Posted by elbowtko View Post
    Hi,

    I am 5' 7'' and wish to get into mountain biking. I am use to 26 inch wheel bikes, and these 29ers look like giganto mountain people bikes.

    How many are out there using 29ers that are 5' 8'' and under and weight less than 160 pounds?
    ''

    Niner Bikes makes one of their frames the "EMD 9" in an extra small and has a standover height of 27".

    Niner's rule

    gnewcomer aka OldMtnGoat

  33. #33
    turtles make me hot
    Reputation: NYrr496's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    7,226
    Quote Originally Posted by gnewcomer View Post
    ''

    Niner Bikes makes one of their frames the "EMD 9" in an extra small and has a standover height of 27".

    Niner's rule

    gnewcomer aka OldMtnGoat
    I rattled off four up above^^^.
    I like turtles

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    40
    Lot of short people on 29ers. To keep your front end down, flip the stem and go with a flat bar. Looks cooler/racier anyways. I like a long handle bar on my 29er, I'm not sure if it's just me but being up so high feels a little weird in corners. Dropping a long bar seems to help. Some of the really small 29ers have shorter than normal chainstays leaving little clearance between your rear tire, seat tube and FD. This is problematic if you like a big or tall knob tire. Take a peek back there before you buy the bike.

  35. #35
    see me rollin, they hatin
    Reputation: NicoleB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    4,618
    5'3. never thought i'd fit on one, but i fit the XS TranceX. big wheels, small wheels, doesnt matter. its more about the frame size as to whether it will fit you. Then again, it's challenging to get a frame size small enough to fit the wheels. people under 5'5 may struggle with top tube length or toe overlap, but it's not impossible. The trance geometry is a bit more slack, and thats why it fits (not so steep and squished inward)
    fap

  36. #36
    333
    333 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    46
    5'4 and I have a geared Niner and singlespeed s-works 29er.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by dru View Post
    I'm a very tall guy at 6'5". I have both frame sizes. There is no difference in performance from one to the other just because 29ers 'supposedly' fit tall people better. The bigger wheels aestheically look better, no doubt about it, but that's about it.

    Very small folks will have issues with the 29er on several fronts.
    1: The front ends can only be made so low.
    2: Standover clearance can ony be made so low because of the high front end.
    3: TT length can be ony so short otherwise toe overlap issues occur.


    Drew
    Hi Drew,

    Good to hear from another tall guy on these forums. I am 6'7" myself and currently look into buying my first bike. So for sure I am looking into buying a 29er, including FS.
    For the frame size, would you agree that going with the biggest available is best? I see a lot of frame sizes being thrown around, what would you say is the minimum size I should go with?

  38. #38
    I like turtles
    Reputation: TiGeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    5,678
    Me. 5'6" and around 160. 15.5" fits perfect.
    Geologist by trade...bicycle mechanic (former) by the grace of God!

    2012 Specialized Stumpy EVO 29 HT

  39. #39
    Rogue Exterminator
    Reputation: kjlued's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,956
    My buddy is 5'6" tall and could ride my old medium 29er (I believe it was 18")
    It might not have been the perfect size for him, but he is sold on getting a 29er.

    Just go to the shop and start riding them and see how you feel.
    Also, look for demo days. You often get a better test ride.

    There or 2 types of mountain bikers.
    Those who have 29ers and those who wish they had 29ers.

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    25
    I find some people under 5'7 either love it or don't. I am 5'10 and feel a perfect match for 29er.

    My friends GF is 5'5 and loved moving to a 29er from her 26. Riding a 29 is certainly more effort in the turns.

    If you have fast and flowy trails a 29er is a great choice. If you have endless tight switch backs then perhaps a 26 would be a better choice (or just wait for 650b)

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    60
    My enighbor is 5'4" and she loves em. Her 6'3" husband, howeve hates em, really weird to me.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 4nbstd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    610
    5'6", and I even went for one size bigger (18" 2010 Kona Unit). With shorter stem (stock 100mm replaced with 60mm) and seat as low as it can go, it handles like any other 26" I've had.
    Ghisallo Wheels

    I'm really good looking.

  43. #43
    US Army Vet-Airborne 11B
    Reputation: longhaultrucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,034
    I'm close at 5'9" and 155lbs,but after going 29"er back in 2008,I haven't looked back since (my Xtracycle being build out of an old TREK 26er I had not-with-standing)
    '11 Origin 8 700CX
    '14 Surly Troll

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15
    My wife is 5'5" and rides a 14.5in GF X-Cal WSD. She loves it. She had a 26in Tarpon for years as her commuter/knock-around bike. She hopped on the X-Cal and never looked back. Likes it MUCH more (although it is an exponentially nicer bike).

    The fork has an 80mm travel, which may make some difference (I have no idea).

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iperov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    136
    for XC better small wheels, lightweight frame,
    29er for asphalt
    winter XC

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    491
    I am the smallest person on my basketball team at 5 foot 11 inches and ride an 18.5" framed 29er. So we midgets don't have much of an issue with 29ers. If I was a micro-midget (say under 5 foot 4 inches) I wouldn't bother tho.
    Buster Bluth. Yiddish for "seeker of toilets"

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    24
    I'm 5'8" (on a good day) and weigh 150#. I got a Diamondback Overdrive Sport 29er as a gift a few months ago. I don't think I could ever go back to my old 26" that I used to ride. They're still nimble enough for any of the technical trails I ride around here. And the manufacturers seem to be getting the geometry down great on these newer bikes.

  48. #48
    dru
    dru is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,443
    Quote Originally Posted by a Villain
    Hi Drew,

    Good to hear from another tall guy on these forums. I am 6'7" myself and currently look into buying my first bike. So for sure I am looking into buying a 29er, including FS.
    For the frame size, would you agree that going with the biggest available is best? I see a lot of frame sizes being thrown around, what would you say is the minimum size I should go with?
    It would almost be a given that you'd want the biggest size, however, careful measurement of your body is a must. I've got very long legs and arms, you may not, so an XL might be fine for you instead of an XXL.

    For the record, my two bikes are really close dimensionally. The 26er has a 25 1/2" tt, the 29er is 25". Both have 23 1/4 " st lengths. I'm running 110 mm and 120 mm stems, and both bikes are typical xc with the seat 2" above the bars.

    6'5", 38" actual (taint to floor) inseam. This gives me about 8 1/2" of exposed seat post. I'm only 180 lbs and I've bent posts on smaller frames over the years.

    Drew
    occasional cyclist

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    9

    29r response

    sketchy in tight turns?

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    15
    29ers look big even the small ones....

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •