Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 42
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    120

    29er Hardtail for me?

    Now that I know my riding preferences I'm thinking a 29er hardtail might be best for me theoretically but my experience is limited to my 26" FS Diamondback Sortie 1 which I have been riding for two years now. I ride mostly single track trails and my biggest weakness is climbing steeper hills, especially while dodging pedal high rocks. I don't ride technically challenging terrain. Going downhill is easy for me where I ride. Here are the reasons I think a 29er hardtail might be my best choice.

    *A lighter and stiffer hard tail might help me get up hills better and since going downhill isn't a problem for me.... However, maybe I'm not strong enough to appreciate a stiffer bike.
    *I am way past my prime and not going to become an aggressive rider.
    *I ride over a lot of soft dirt and loose rock and gravel but most of the time I ride on decent quality packed dirt.
    *I never jump anything or drop off anything bigger than a curb.
    *It seems to me a carbon hardtail would be comfy enough, especially since my hybrid without suspension is tolerable.
    *Everywhere I ride is ridden at least occasionally by people on cyclocross bikes.
    *For the last couple of months I have been riding an old hybrid with no suspension. With it I don't miss the suspension and I think the bigger tires ride over rocks and gravel better even though the tires are narrow.

    Concerns:
    -Since hardtails are popular for racing and I am relatively slow and weak, maybe I shouldn't get one.
    -Maybe a 27.5 would be better.
    -I do ride on switchbacks occasionally. At first they were real challenging for me on my 26" bike but they are not a problem for me now. New sticky tires downhill switchbacks much easier.

    A bike I am considering is the Giant XTC Composite 29er: XtC Composite 29er 1 (2014) | Giant Bicycles | United States

    I'd appreciate any feedback.
    Thanks,

  2. #2
    Long Live the Gorn!
    Reputation: bvader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    152
    Hardtail?... 29er Done. Look no further on wheel size for you.

    XTC 1 Nice Bike There are probably some others in that range but that is a nice all around bike. Scott make some Hardtails nice in that same range.
    But you get a lot for your money with Giant.

    There are tons of threads on 29er hardtails in this forum I would go look at a few but more importantly get out and ride a few.

  3. #3
    MTB B'dos
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,910
    If you've been riding a hybrid for the last little while and find it suits your needs, then definitely a 29er HT will work for you. Other materials to look at besides carbon are Steel and Ti, both will add some compliance to the ride. Make sure you get one that has ample clearance outback to fit a decent size 2.4" tyre, just in case you step up the terrain you ride on as it will add some cush. Also nice wide rims, 28mm> will help those tyres with stability and allow the use of lower pressures. Take a look as said at all the treads in here on HTs, especially take a look at the Surly Karate Monkey thread, very versatile bike, can be configured so many ways.
    One day your life will flash before your eyes, will it be worth watching??
    MTB Barbados
    My Phantom pics

  4. #4
    I like bikes.
    Reputation: Dirtydogg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    311
    29er is a good choice for less technical trails and it will be a bit more bump compliant for your body and give a smoother rolling feel.
    As LyNx stated, a wider tire aired down less will provide better cushion. Just remember a wider tire will need to be aired up more when ridden on the road or you'll pedal your ass off and feel like your towing a small utility trailer behind you..lol
    Definitely a hardtail for your riding style. FS bikes are harder climbers and pricey. You can take that cost and put it into better components!

    Also, If your worried about the hardness of a hardtail on your body, I would look into a cushioned seat post. It will give you some absorption yet allow you to climb easier on the hills where as you'll be wasting energy pedaling uphill with a FS bike. The seat posts are pricey and I haven't used one but my uncle loves his. They are cheaper option than a FS bike that's for sure.
    Karakoram...ZS44, X-Fusion, Freq i23, Tioga's, Shadow & XT,Shim Hydro 180/160, MG-1 pedals & more.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    117
    +1 to what the other guys said.

    I'm a similar rider, and I'm on a 29er hardtail. If I had to replace it, then I would buy another 29er hardtail.

    I don't even look at FS bikes... too complicated, too expensive, too maintenance intensive.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    5,779
    The geo of the XTC, with a 71.5 ht angle was twitchy on downhills when I test rode one. You should demo that bike as part of your decision process.
    Check a Trek Superfly 9.6. It has exceptional compliance and is all new.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    735
    Id go with a 29er chinese carbon HT frame. They run about $400 and are super light. As Ive gotten better Ive found that most trails here (lots of rocks) still are fine on a hard tail

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    120
    Thanks for your excellent replies.
    It looks unanimous that a 29er HT would be a good choice for me.
    I like the suspension seat post concept. Hopefully I won't need it and the extra weight but it is an excellent option.
    There are too many geometry factors to consider so I have to try before I buy. I wish demo's were more available. I found a couple of HT 29er nearby that I can rent for a day. That will be educational.
    I think I am to chicken and too lazy to buy a Chinese frame and build a bike myself.

    Should I avoid a race oriented XC bike because of the stiffer BB or is there no disadvantage of a stiffer BB?
    The chain stay of the XTC is 17.3" long. Is that long enough for wider tires? I doubt if I will be wanting wider tires because the 29er tires are already so much better than what I have been using on my 26" and on my hybrid. I don't mind walking over the real gnarly sections.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Epic_Dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    767
    Sounds like you are sold on a 29er Hardtail and I would say you've made a good decision.

    Giant XTC 1 is a good choice, as is a Scott Scale or Trek Superfly or even a Fuji SLM which is another brand that is good value.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,353
    Quote Originally Posted by goodmojo View Post
    Id go with a 29er chinese carbon HT frame. They run about $400 and are super light. As Ive gotten better Ive found that most trails here (lots of rocks) still are fine on a hard tail
    From where do you get those? Seems like something I would try...

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    200
    I wouldn't go with a Chinese carbon frame ever. Check out some of the crash pics.
    The XTC is a great bike, my dad has one, its very stiff and handles well, he went with some wider handle bars and loves the bike now. if you want something a little slacker, check out the Pivot LES 29. Definitely pricier though. Another option you may want to look at is the Specialized Stumpjumper Comp Carbon. It runs 2500 at my lbs (2700 retail).

    If you are also interested in a steel bike, check out the niner sir 9 or vassago verhauen. The Verhauen will be my next bike.
    Vassago Verhauen SS
    2013 Stumpjumper FSR Comp 29
    2014 Stumpjumper Evo HT
    2014 Tarmac Elite

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    5,779
    Quote Originally Posted by dugt View Post
    Should I avoid a race oriented XC bike because of the stiffer BB or is there no disadvantage of a stiffer BB?
    The chain stay of the XTC is 17.3" long. Is that long enough for wider tires? I doubt if I will be wanting wider tires because the 29er tires are already so much better than what I have been using on my 26" and on my hybrid. I don't mind walking over the real gnarly sections.
    A race oriented XC bike can have a steep head tube angle like 71 degrees and a stiff frame for efficiency in pedaling instead of more compliance for comfort and longer distance riding without getting beat up. A suspension post is not that useful because a hard tail is ridden standing up over bumps.
    The length of the chain stays mostly affects how responsive and quick the steering is. 435mm/17.1" is a sweet spot when paired with a 68-69 ht angle and 51mm fork offset.
    Wider on the front helps more to keep your bike from washing out in turns. 2.25 or so is a good rear width. You always want more traction, but not at the expense of rolling speed.

    Demo or rent a Trek Superfly, preferably a carbon 9.6-9.8 for very good compliance and handling. You won't need to walk it over gnarl, that's where this bike is most fun.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    36
    Crash pics don't mean anything, I have friends that use chinese frames over years with no damage even after some nasty falls. Its not like some big brand name like specialized is impossible to break just as easily. i ride the XTC 1 like above and I love it.
    Good luck with whatever you choose!
    NorCal High-School XC
    2014 Giant XTC Composite 29er
    2012 Scott Scale Team 29er
    2013 Diamondback Podium 5

  14. #14
    ijd
    ijd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    54
    Look at a carbon seatpost instead of a suspension one. It will still give some flex/comfort without the added weight.

  15. #15
    29ers Forever
    Reputation: CannondaleF9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    2,787
    Just because something is used for racing doesn't meant you shouldn't buy it. For a hardtail, 29er is what you should buy. If you are set on the Giant, go for it, you'll love it.
    2013 Trek Cobia- 29er
    2015 Raleigh Misceo- Gravel bike
    2013 Trek 3700 Disk- 26er
    1994 Cannondale R300- narrow tire roadie

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    120
    I been reading up on hardtails and the bikes recommended here. So far I am still leaning toward a Giant XTC. The nervousness of the Giant XTC might actually be better for me. I believe a turny bike helps in dodging stuff going uphill, especially as slow as I go. Since riding uphill is my weakness and downhill is not a problem, maybe I should be willing to trade some downhill performance (twitchiness) for uphill performance.

    Building a bike with a Hong Fu frame intrigues me. I could do it. I have the time and skills but I can also afford to buy whatever bike I want. The last straw for that concept might be resale value. I think it would be much harder to sell a built up bike than a name brand. I don't foresee wanting to sell it soon but "things change" (**** happens).

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    5,779
    Quote Originally Posted by dugt View Post
    I been reading up on hardtails and the bikes recommended here. So far I am still leaning toward a Giant XTC. The nervousness of the Giant XTC might actually be better for me. I believe a turny bike helps in dodging stuff going uphill, especially as slow as I go. Since riding uphill is my weakness and downhill is not a problem, maybe I should be willing to trade some downhill performance (twitchiness) for uphill performance.

    Building a bike with a Hong Fu frame intrigues me. I could do it. I have the time and skills but I can also afford to buy whatever bike I want. The last straw for that concept might be resale value. I think it would be much harder to sell a built up bike than a name brand. I don't foresee wanting to sell it soon but "things change" (**** happens).
    Both Giant and Trek run good size Factory Demo programs. The XTC and the Superfly 9.8 will be available to ride.
    Demo and then you will have the info you need. I went both days and got 5 hours on the 9.8(different sizes) before going for it. The SF 9.8 turns intuitively.
    Good luck.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    120
    I had given up on the Superfly for two reasons. I couldn't find much info about the geometry and it looks like there are no demo's scheduled for California or even the west coast. Just now I rechecked to find that Trek's west coast demo van was stolen three days ago. Later it was found on fire with all thirty bikes missing. That is horrible. I hope they find the culprits.
    I wonder if Fox News will report they are not sure if Giant or Specialized had anything to do with it. :-) This last sentence is a joke but the rest is unfortunately true. Here is a link to the story. Trek demo trailer stolen in California, found empty and on fire | Bicycle Retailer and Industry News

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    5,779
    The geo is new but a development of the 9.9 SL Apollo Project bike from 2013. That was the first collaborative effort with the engineering group responsible for Trek's carbon road bikes. Road feel and compliance are important in selling those.
    But this new model has 10mm shorter chain stays and 5mm more bb drop. You feel full frame compliance from the rear of the bike going over bumps with feel kinda like a well valved shock. I had 5 hours of my home trail demo last September. The 51mm offset quickens the steering more than other 435mm bikes and it is faster than Trek's traditional solid ride. It is actually more bike than you need for your current terrain. There are some fun trails out there.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    120
    I found the geometry chart for the Superfly. Trek includes many more details than Giant does. The SF 9.8 has great components but is more than I wanted to spend. The 9.6 has sram components. I've heard they aren't as strong as Shimano and I am a big fan of Shimano. I'm going to try to find a way to try a 9.8 and an XTC. I suspect I'll love both of them and it will be a tough decision.
    Trek does a better job on their website and that influences me. If a company can't do a good job on their website I question their quality in general.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    5,779
    The 9.6 is a very good value, considering the quality of the engineering you get in the frame. The brakes are also almost as good as SLX/XT versions. They use the same pads. It only has a Sram X7 front derailleur. Shifters are Deore like the brakes and the rear derailleur is XT Shadow Plus. No real need to upgrade.
    Find a larger platinum dealer and hold out for Trek Fest(just happened) 15% off.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    6
    I suppose the majority of the 29er's I've been building could be considered to be in the "all mountain" category. To me, "all mountain" is more about riding up the mountain, down the mountain and everything in between. Which kind of gets at what mountain biking is all about and really what the roots of the sport are. My personal taste is a balance between head tube angle, bottom bracket height and chainstay length while balancing the rider between the wheels to get them "in" the bike.**********************/afc8[/IMG]
    Last edited by mikailov; 06-09-2014 at 09:15 PM.

  23. #23
    Short-Change-Hero
    Reputation: gregnash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    3,014
    Quote Originally Posted by mikailov View Post
    I suppose the majority of the 29er's I've been building could be considered to be in the "all mountain" category. To me, "all mountain" is more about riding up the mountain, down the mountain and everything in between. Which kind of gets at what mountain biking is all about and really what the roots of the sport are. My personal taste is a balance between head tube angle, bottom bracket height and chainstay length while balancing the rider between the wheels to get them "in" the bike.
    This is what I consider more "Trail" riding than All-Mountain. AM to me is taking hucks that are around 4' or so, but not consistently larger than that. But I do agree that this is what mtb'ing is all about, hitting the dirt on the trail and riding everything that is thrown at it while the trail is being built, not necessarily neutering the trail by removing all the boulders, rocks, roots, etc.
    Second part about balancing everything so that rider feels like they are "in" the bike and not "on" the bike is key, this will make you feel more confident and comfortable when the angles change on you.

    For me, I started riding about 3yrs ago. I went and demo'd a few bikes from my LBS and decided that 29er was the way for me, this was after not riding anything but walmart 26ers since I was like 10yrs old and having taken a 6yr break from riding at all. But I am too anal-retentive to just go buy something, so I began building my own 29er from parts. During that time I borrowed my brothers (thankfully he has multiple bikes and is close to my size) Rocky Mountain Element 5.0 (which is a more XC oriented bike). I rode that bike for a good 6 months before being done with building my 29er steel hardtail and loved every minute of it, but when I moved to 29er it was a night and day difference for ME. This I chalk up to there being no real previous history or biased toward one bike type thus allowing me to change over more readily.

    I still ride that steel hardtail today and love everything about it. But as my age catches up with my body I am having a harder time dealing with the impact on the trails I ride (which are more trail verging on all-mountain). So this year I will be slowly building up a fully, my first, and the HT will be relegated to the extra bike/fun bike/commuter.
    Inbred 29r (Purple People Eater)
    HH Thumper (Blackheart)
    Bikes for Boobs F*ck Cancer! One too many, 6/24/13. Miss ya ma'.

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    120
    I just bought a Giant XTC Advanced 1 29er HT. Supposedly it is an early launch of a 2015 model XTC. Its components are very similar to the XTC Composite 1 and the geometry is identical. The frame is made of better CF which is stronger than the Composite but more compliant than the CF used in Advanced SL frames. The price was slightly lower than the listed price for the XTC Composite 1 in spite of the better frame. It isn't on Giants web site yet.

    I believe the 2014 XTC Composite 1 is discontinued.

    I was also considering the Trek Superfly 9.6 but I prefer the XTC's brakes, shifters, crank, seat post and shock. Also, I really prefer the white and blue 2015 XTC vs the black and red Superfly.

    Some think the XTC is a little too eager to turn at speed but I doubt if that will be an issue for me. My road bike seemed too nervous for the first couple of months but I like it now. I tried my friends Trek Madone and it seemed relatively hard to turn. I trust I will adjust to any idiosyncrasies of the new XTC. I'll be on pins and needles until I get it next week. It is shipping from Chicago to CA.

    Thanks to everyone for recommending I read a lot of the threads about HT 29ers. I've been obsessively reading for days and now I believe I've read enough to make an informed decision even though I have yet to ride a 29er. Since I want a HT I believe getting a 29er is a safe bet and this Giant seems like a good value for this time of year.

    After I get it and ride it I will update this thread.

    Thanks again for all of the great posts!
    Last edited by dugt; 06-27-2014 at 08:15 PM.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    5,779
    That compliance info sounds encouraging, and the bike may better match your riding style. But buying on words is something I don't do, sometimes it's called "puff" and that means anything goes.
    Here's an example---

    "Despite Storck’s claims of ‘vertical compliance’ and ‘a high degree of vibration dampening’, the Rebel is an absolute ass-kicker. We’re not talking a bit of buzz and a need to dodge big rocks and be careful off drops either; the Rebel turns even duck boards into tooth-rattling, spine-shaking jackhammers, bruises your feet on long rocky rides and gives you a proper ‘brain against skull’ staccato concussion on stepped descents if you’re too heavy on the brakes."



    Suicidal tendencies would be a fun test.
    Last edited by eb1888; 04-30-2014 at 07:55 PM.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 75
    Last Post: 03-17-2014, 10:48 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-15-2013, 09:14 PM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-18-2012, 05:24 AM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-20-2011, 06:33 PM
  5. Best Hardtail 29er out???
    By Hardtail87 in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-07-2011, 07:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •