Results 1 to 68 of 68
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    663

    2.6 wagon wheelers

    anyone in here running 2.6 tires on their big wheeler? thoughts?

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    526
    not a lot of options out there right now, I'm definitely interested in this as well

  3. #3
    Keep on Rockin...
    Reputation: Miker J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,319
    Quote Originally Posted by Arctic Pride View Post
    not a lot of options out there right now, I'm definitely interested in this as well
    Agree.

  4. #4
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    11,416
    Quote Originally Posted by cunningstunts View Post
    anyone in here running 2.6 tires on their big wheeler? thoughts?

    Yep. 2.6" are better than 2.5", but I keep coming back to 3.0 as the best all-rounder. Typically using Bontrager Chupacabra's, which are lighter and grippier than they look, or than you'd think.

    Sorry -- not an intentional thread drift, but it is an honest answer to the question.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    11,590
    I'd like to see an XR2 Team 2.6.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: coke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,269
    Some of my personal experience:

    29x2.5 DHF (3 c maxterra) has a LOT of grip, does not roll well, and is heavy. It's possibly the best tire available when going down, but it's just too slow on flats and climbs for me.

    29x2.6 nobby nic has a good amount of grip, rolls fairly well, and isn't too heavy. Not sure of the new compounds, but I preferred pacestar front and rear to keep rolling resistance down.

    29x3.0 WTB ranger has a surprising amount of grip, seems to roll just as fast as xc race tires, and isn't too heavy. Downside to this tire are that the knobs aren't tall, so it tends to float on leaves and needles rather than poke through down to the dirt like the tires mentioned above.

    Overall, 29x3.0 is by far my favorite. While riding it feels like I have almost as much traction as a DHF, but I'm also beating my PRs on full laps and race loops.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    663
    there are the new Spesh Butcher and Hillbilly and maybe a few more coming. most 29ers will fit 2.5 2.6 even, but not 3 unless it's a purpose designed plus bike i reckon. i too like the 2.5 DHF's a great deal. i don't find them heavy personally, just right given their damping and strength. i fully expect a durable tire of this nature to be around 950 to 1100 grams in order to perform well at low pressures on rough trails and high speeds.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Just J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,929
    I think a lot of us are waiting on the 29x2.6" Maxxis Rekons but I have to agree that 29 x 3.0" has to be the best all rounders. I am running a Chupacabra on the rear with a Minion DHF up front and this set does EVERYTHING well, from hard pack/road to mud, slick roots and as proven to myself over the past couple of days, even snow. Killer combo!

    I'm running a 2.5 WT DHF with a 2.4 WT DHR on my F/S bike and also really rate that setup, although there are faster tyres when it comes to going up. Not so many on the way down though!

  9. #9
    Keep on Rockin...
    Reputation: Miker J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,319
    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    Yep. 2.6" are better than 2.5", but I keep coming back to 3.0 as the best all-rounder. Typically using Bontrager Chupacabra's, which are lighter and grippier than they look, or than you'd think.

    Sorry -- not an intentional thread drift, but it is an honest answer to the question.

    As a side...

    Mike if you were building a spare fully rigid rig is the 3 x 29 what you'd recommend?

  10. #10
    Keep on Rockin...
    Reputation: Miker J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,319
    Quote Originally Posted by coke View Post
    Some of my personal experience:

    29x2.5 DHF (3 c maxterra) has a LOT of grip, does not roll well, and is heavy. It's possibly the best tire available when going down, but it's just too slow on flats and climbs for me.

    29x2.6 nobby nic has a good amount of grip, rolls fairly well, and isn't too heavy. Not sure of the new compounds, but I preferred pacestar front and rear to keep rolling resistance down.

    29x3.0 WTB ranger has a surprising amount of grip, seems to roll just as fast as xc race tires, and isn't too heavy. Downside to this tire are that the knobs aren't tall, so it tends to float on leaves and needles rather than poke through down to the dirt like the tires mentioned above.

    Overall, 29x3.0 is by far my favorite. While riding it feels like I have almost as much traction as a DHF, but I'm also beating my PRs on full laps and race loops.
    What rims are you running those tires on?

  11. #11
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    11,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Miker J View Post
    As a side...

    Mike if you were building a spare fully rigid rig is the 3 x 29 what you'd recommend?

    For whom? Used how? Where?

    I've spent the last ~6 months thinkering on and assembling an 'expedition bike'. Full rigid, yes. Will be used mostly off-piste, largely in a desert environment.

    Super simple, super capable, super durable was the goal. Lots of ways to arrive at that. It came down to 29+ vs. B Fat, for me. I chose B Fat. Could easily have gone 29+, but for deep sand B Fat won out.

  12. #12
    Keep on Rockin...
    Reputation: Miker J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,319
    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    For whom? Used how? Where?

    I've spent the last ~6 months thinkering on and assembling an 'expedition bike'. Full rigid, yes. Will be used mostly off-piste, largely in a desert environment.

    Super simple, super capable, super durable was the goal. Lots of ways to arrive at that. It came down to 29+ vs. B Fat, for me. I chose B Fat. Could easily have gone 29+, but for deep sand B Fat won out.

    Cool. Thanks.

    What's your non-carbon rim of choice for the 29+ ?

  13. #13
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    11,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Miker J View Post
    Cool. Thanks.

    What's your non-carbon rim of choice for the 29+ ?

    Same 3 questions as before...

  14. #14
    Keep on Rockin...
    Reputation: Miker J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,319
    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    Same 3 questions as before...
    Routine trail riding. Rocky NE. 180# - me.

  15. #15
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    11,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Miker J View Post
    Routine trail riding. Rocky NE. 180# - me.

    which tires @ what psi?

  16. #16
    Keep on Rockin...
    Reputation: Miker J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,319
    Well, I'm 29+ curious, and not sure what I'd end up with.

    I'm a Maxxis fan but what they have now in bigger 29 doesn't move me. They have always worked well with the Stan's rims I've used. For trail riding I'm a DHF/DHRii in smaller volumes but for a 29x3 I'm looking at something less aggressive. The shear size of a fatter tire gives a lot of traction even with smaller knobs, mud excluded.

    Thinking about WTB. They sort of have their own bead set up that I'm not sure works well with "non-TCS" tires. The Ranger looks reasonable.


    This is experimental, for a back up HT or fully rigid.


    The last experiment I did paid off very well. Set up the next 275 x 2.6 Maxxis tire on Derby's on a FS. For trail riding I can't imagine it getting much better... well except maybe a FS 29 x 2.6...

  17. #17
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    11,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Miker J View Post
    Well, I'm 29+ curious, and not sure what I'd end up with.

    I'm a Maxxis fan but what they have now in bigger 29 doesn't move me. They have always worked well with the Stan's rims I've used. For trail riding I'm a DHF/DHRii in smaller volumes but for a 29x3 I'm looking at something less aggressive. The shear size of a fatter tire gives a lot of traction even with smaller knobs, mud excluded.

    Thinking about WTB. They sort of have their own bead set up that I'm not sure works well with "non-TCS" tires. The Ranger looks reasonable.


    This is experimental, for a back up HT or fully rigid.

    The last experiment I did paid off very well. Set up the next 275 x 2.6 Maxxis tire on Derby's on a FS. For trail riding I can't imagine it getting much better... well except maybe a FS 29 x 2.6...

    You're probably going to want a Duroc in 40mm.

    That's the short version of an answer. But given all that you're written -- yeah.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    11,590
    If you want to run a 120tpi lightweight 29x3" at medium speeds a wide rim will let you reduce pressure to get the biggest footprint out of your tire. 43mm inner or more. Trek specs a 46mm inner Duroc on the Stache.

  19. #19
    Keep on Rockin...
    Reputation: Miker J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,319
    Thanks.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation: coke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,269
    Quote Originally Posted by Miker J View Post
    What rims are you running those tires on?
    I've used the 2.5 and 2.6 on a variety of rims. Most recently had them on one bike with 26mm internal and another bike with 30mm internal.

    3" tires were on 40mm internal rims.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    526
    anyone taking actual measurements of the tire widths?

  22. #22
    AOK
    AOK is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: AOK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,998
    Quote Originally Posted by Arctic Pride View Post
    anyone taking actual measurements of the tire widths?
    I have a set of 2.6 Nobby Nics on i35 rims.

    They measure true to size - right at 2.6.
    ( This is measuring on the casing.)

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: azjonboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,616
    I run a 29x3.0 Chupacabra on Flow MKlll rims on my rigid SS. Tubeless at 11 psi up front. Tons of traction

    My geared hardtail is set up 27.5+ with WTB i40 Scraper with 27.5 x 2.8 Chupacabra also tubeless at 11 psi up front. Loads of traction.

    Yes, the WTB i40 rims spread the tire out more, but i actually prefer the Flow MKlll with the 29 x 3.0.

    IMHO the WTB rims are way too soft if you ride a lot of rocks.

    I'm waiting for the 29 x 2.6 Rekon as well to run on the geared bike.
    If you're lucky enough to be in the mountains,
    you're lucky enough.

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Porkchop_Power's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    214
    Also waiting on the 2.6 Rekons. What is the latest on when it will be available?

  25. #25
    Keep on Rockin...
    Reputation: Miker J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,319
    Quote Originally Posted by Porkchop_Power View Post
    Also waiting on the 2.6 Rekons. What is the latest on when it will be available?
    Wish Maxxis was planning on a Forekaster 29x2.6, 3C for the front, dual out back.

    In a 275 X 2.6 it is a great all around tire.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: coolhand80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    666
    Rekon 29x2.6 is available now in both 3C and DC
    https://shop.maxxis.com/c/bicycle_mo...irected_post=1


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    6,275
    Quote Originally Posted by eb1888 View Post
    I'd like to see an XR2 Team 2.6.
    Well, since it's Christmas time, I'll go further and wish for XR2, 3, and 4 in 2.6!

    XR3 probably highest on my personal list right now.
    Whining is not a strategy.

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jeffreyjhsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    243
    I'm looking Forward to the Kenda Saber Pro 2.6. Out this spring(I hope). Kenda Tires | Bicycle | Saber Pro Bike Tires | Find a Tire | Kenda Tires

  29. #29
    Out spokin'
    Reputation: Sparticus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Posts
    8,437
    I'm running 2.6" Nobby Nics on 29 x i30.5 rims on an FS sled.
    I've got a second set of wheels -- 27.5 x i45 rims w/Nobby Nic 3" tires that fit the same bike.
    All is well.
    =sParty
    disciplesofdirt.org

    We don't quit riding because we get old.
    We get old because we quit riding.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bubba13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    991
    Quote Originally Posted by Miker J View Post
    Wish Maxxis was planning on a Forekaster 29x2.6, 3C for the front, dual out back.

    In a 275 X 2.6 it is a great all around tire.
    According to Maxxis, the 29x2.6 Forekaster is in the works. Not sure when they plan to release it.
    Portland Off Road Navagators

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    48
    2.6 wagon wheelers-img_8972.jpgI'm running a Spec Butcher 29 x 2.6 on the front. I just ordered one for the rear. Went with the Gripton version. Seems measure true. I will try and get exact dims.

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: sgill32's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    111
    Quote Originally Posted by ArchieTolliver View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8972.jpg 
Views:	231 
Size:	188.6 KB 
ID:	1176360I'm running a Spec Butcher 29 x 2.6 on the front. I just ordered one for the rear. Went with the Gripton version. Seems measure true. I will try and get exact dims.
    Would be interested to know overall diameter, your rim width and PSI on the front tire/wheel. I have a DVO Diamond (tight tire clearance) so very interested to see if this could fit. Thanks!

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: reamer41's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    755

    2.6 wagon wheelers

    Loving the Maxxis Recon 29 x 2.60! Just one ride in, but so far very impressed. Great traction great ride qualities.
    --Reamer

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    724
    I've been running the 2.6 NN ADDIX speed grip on DT Swiss XM 480 rims @ 16PSI rear then the 2.6 NN Trailstar on WTB ASYM35 @ 15PSI front. It's like having a short travel FS bike feel on my fully rigid SS. I've run the 3" Surly Dirt Wizzards but they are slower in the tight switch backs. It's real loose on my So Cal trails so I don't mess with small nobby tires.
    [COLOR="Black"]HARDMTNBIKER on Instagram

    Seven Sola SLX ENVE MTN SS
    Sir9 Carbon Niner SS
    #1gearallyear #Iridemtn

  35. #35
    Recovering Weight Weenie
    Reputation: Padre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,808
    Can't say I'm looking for a way to push a 1300-1500 gram tire around. I'm getting boat loads of traction from a 2.3" Minion DHF...not sure I'd need more traction on a shorter travel bike.

  36. #36
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    11,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Padre View Post
    Can't say I'm looking for a way to push a 1300-1500 gram tire around. I'm getting boat loads of traction from a 2.3" Minion DHF...not sure I'd need more traction on a shorter travel bike.

    (looks around, wondering...)

    did someone suggest there were 1500g 2.6" tires?

    even the 3" chupa's are under 900g.

    i get that you think you have boatloads of traction with your CX tires. i'm also pretty sure you're still operating on the old definition of "boatloads". and also that you haven't yet experienced the supple ride that a true high volume/low pressure tire gives.

    believe it or not, a 3" tire is in your wheelhouse, for many reasons. less suspension movement needed, less tire pressure needed, same (or better) traction with less rolling resistance.

    you should check with B and see what he has for you to demo. or not...

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    6,275
    ^^^ Ya, pretty much that.

    Traction via a different path than big, slow knobs on a firm, skinny tire.

    I've been at this a long time, and will admit I've always resisted going to the next bigger tire, but once done, always wonder why I waited.

    Starting -- ahem -- from Panaracer Fire 1.8s and moving upwards from there!
    Whining is not a strategy.

  38. #38
    Anytime. Anywhere.
    Reputation: Travis Bickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    7,560
    The Knolly Fugitive that's being released this spring has 29 X 2.6 clearance.
    I got some bad ideas in my head.

  39. #39
    Recovering Weight Weenie
    Reputation: Padre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,808
    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    (looks around, wondering...)

    did someone suggest there were 1500g 2.6" tires?

    even the 3" chupa's are under 900g.

    i get that you think you have boatloads of traction with your CX tires. i'm also pretty sure you're still operating on the old definition of "boatloads". and also that you haven't yet experienced the supple ride that a true high volume/low pressure tire gives.

    believe it or not, a 3" tire is in your wheelhouse, for many reasons. less suspension movement needed, less tire pressure needed, same (or better) traction with less rolling resistance.

    you should check with B and see what he has for you to demo. or not...
    Made the assumption that some of these offerings would be dual-ply offerings. My bad.

    If someone is using 2.3" DHFs as a CX tire, they are surely losing. =D

    We have tried the + thing...for where we ride mostly, it wasn't a welcome change. Not enough kitty litter and too much double/singletrack that simply doesn't require Łber-traction.

    Even B isn't riding these big tires! Just the standard 2.3-2.5 Bonty 29er tires.

    I've seen the apocalyptic traction they get from your beautiful vids...believe me...I'd love to have that as my backyard loop...but nay.

  40. #40
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    11,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Padre View Post
    Made the assumption that some of these offerings would be dual-ply offerings. My bad.

    If someone is using 2.3" DHFs as a CX tire, they are surely losing. =D

    We have tried the + thing...for where we ride mostly, it wasn't a welcome change. Not enough kitty litter and too much double/singletrack that simply doesn't require Łber-traction.

    Even B isn't riding these big tires! Just the standard 2.3-2.5 Bonty 29er tires.

    I've seen the apocalyptic traction they get from your beautiful vids...believe me...I'd love to have that as my backyard loop...but nay.


    C'mon man -- your reading comprehension is better than that.

    I'll distill it down for you. If you ditch the 2.3's and opt for 29 x 3", you:

    -Don't have to gain any meaningful weight. Maybe 10 or 20g, but it doesn't have to be more.

    -Get to drop your PSI by double digits. Running 30 now? Figure 20, but probably less.

    -Don't gain any rolling resistance. You might lose some.


    If you want crazy traction, sure -- a 29 x 3" DHF is going to get you that. But look at the Chupa tread. Fast roller -- not just about grip.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bikeny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,693

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Pedal Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    7
    I have a teravail kennebec and cumberland both in 29 x 2.6 light and supple. They measure a little over 2.7 at the knobs on my flow mk3's. I weighed them before mounting since I gave up looking for accurate weight info. Don't tell my wife I used the kitchen scale for tires. They roll fast and grip well, the cumberland in the rear really surprised me with its grip on climbs.

    Also offered in a durable casing, even though these light and supple seem to look fairly tough.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 2.6 wagon wheelers-cumberland-2-6-ls.jpg  

    2.6 wagon wheelers-kennebec-2-6-ls.jpg  


  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Klainmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    516
    Any word on the Bontrager XR4 2.6 coming out? Now that's a tire I can get behind!

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    663
    teravail?? from what alternate universe did these come from? i thought i knew a lot of obscure mtb products but i've never heard of these tires. big in Japan?

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Klainmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    516
    Quote Originally Posted by cunningstunts View Post
    teravail?? from what alternate universe did these come from? i thought i knew a lot of obscure mtb products but i've never heard of these tires. big in Japan?
    I beleive they're an american group with support from QBP. Relatively new, good products.

  46. #46
    Ride On
    Reputation: geraldooka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    717
    Chupas vs DHF's... Surely that comparison is entirely dependent on terrain, climate, rider, bike etc.

    I LOVE my Krampus one of my fave bikes ever, full stop. However there is NO WAY I would consider the Chupa's or any other low profile knob plus tire as even remotely as grippy as a DHF 2.3, 2.5 or DHR 2.3, 2.4 in our PNW riding conditions, especially in winter but even in the dry summer months. Low profile plus tires run at low pressures are fun to ride but at my rider weight (150ish) they tend to float rather than sting. Now if we're talking the 3.0 DHR/DHF thats a completely different animal but then you WILL notice the heft of those bad boys.

    If I lived in the desert with tons of dry grippy rock I'm sure I'd appreciate the low profile plus tires more. Then again my DHF "CX" tires grip amazingly in those conditions too...
    Michael

    Ride on!

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jimw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    526
    Quote Originally Posted by ArchieTolliver View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8972.jpg 
Views:	231 
Size:	188.6 KB 
ID:	1176360I'm running a Spec Butcher 29 x 2.6 on the front. I just ordered one for the rear. Went with the Gripton version. Seems measure true. I will try and get exact dims.
    Quote Originally Posted by sgill32 View Post
    Would be interested to know overall diameter, your rim width and PSI on the front tire/wheel. I have a DVO Diamond (tight tire clearance) so very interested to see if this could fit. Thanks!
    I've been running this tire on a stock Enduro coil '17. Great tire. But it's nowhere near actually being 2.6. It measures at about 2.45. Makes sense, given that the specs list it as only 85g heavier than the 2.3. Still a great tire though, just realize it's not gonna measure 2.6. This is on a stock aluminum Roval Fattie 29mm internal width rim.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    526
    Quote Originally Posted by reamer41 View Post
    Loving the Maxxis Recon 29 x 2.60! Just one ride in, but so far very impressed. Great traction great ride qualities.
    what are you running for pressures? Any sealant seeping from the sidewalls?

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: reamer41's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    755
    Quote Originally Posted by Arctic Pride View Post
    what are you running for pressures? Any sealant seeping from the sidewalls?
    No sealant seepage at all.
    Still experimenting with pressures. I went out the other day with 13 rear 10.5 front. Was a bit low.
    I think 15-16 rear and 14 front may be in the ballpark. I weigh 220.
    --Reamer

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    92
    Quote Originally Posted by reamer41 View Post
    No sealant seepage at all.
    Still experimenting with pressures. I went out the other day with 13 rear 10.5 front. Was a bit low.
    I think 15-16 rear and 14 front may be in the ballpark. I weigh 220.
    Are those the pressures you settled on? I weigh about the same.

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation: reamer41's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    755
    Quote Originally Posted by rjcobra View Post
    Are those the pressures you settled on? I weigh about the same.
    For now, yeah. I don't know that I can say I'm done tinkering.
    29mm internal rim, btw.
    --Reamer

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    939
    Quote Originally Posted by Klainmeister View Post
    Any word on the Bontrager XR4 2.6 coming out? Now that's a tire I can get behind!
    Haven't tried them out yet.
    New Bontrager XR4 team issue 29 x 2.6
    Available at Trek superstore.

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    258
    +1 for Schwable NN addix 29x2.6 Love these tires! Big volume, decent open spaced knobs shed snow and mud, and not a heavy tire

  54. #54
    I am Walt
    Reputation: waltaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,232

    2.6 wagon wheelers

    Great thread...

    My experience:
    - Upgraded to a 29+ frame in Nov (Vassago Optimus Ti, running SS)
    - Repurposed a set of almost new Flow MK3ís (laced to Hope Pro 4ís), which are i29mm, with Ranger 3.0ís (even though the interwebs say thatís too wide on that rim). Really liked it, but felt a bit slower rolling. Had got to about 14 f/17 r PSI (Iím 190 geared up).
    - Was pining for a 2.8/2/6 option, and caught wind of the Rekonís
    - Switched to the Rekonís, but found them to be rather slow rolling (draggy). Very plush-feeling ride and hook up great; however, and a great choice for chunkier stuff. Ran them at 12-12.5 f/ 14.5-15 r PSI.
    - Just switched to Ardent 2.4 f/Ikon 2.35 r for an upcoming 24-hour solo race. Running 14 f/17 r PSI. Wow, do they feel fast after the Rekons!
    - All of the above on the Flow MK3ís
    - Because I do want to run Plus, for the reasons mikesee mentions above, I am having a ďplusĒ wheelset built up with Duroc 40ís (i36mm) laced to I9 hubs with SS-specific rear (recently available). I will run the Ranger 3.0ís on these as my Plus wheelset, and am very interested to see how they ride/feel/roll vs. the ďfastĒ Ardent/Ikon/Flow setup.

    Thanks for listening...great info from all!


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Ride more; post less...

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    92
    Quote Originally Posted by reamer41 View Post
    For now, yeah. I don't know that I can say I'm done tinkering.
    29mm internal rim, btw.
    Are you using the 120 or 60 tpi?

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation: reamer41's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    755
    Quote Originally Posted by rjcobra View Post
    Are you using the 120 or 60 tpi?
    120.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    --Reamer

  57. #57
    Trail Rider
    Reputation: mlx john's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    806
    Running a XR4 2.6 on the front of my FEX and a 2.4 XR3 on the rear.

    29er Line Pro 30's (29mm id)

    The 2.6 is perfect, so much more grip cornering. I was sliding out with the XR4 2.4 on the front, tire was too square.

    The XR3 on the rear hooks up well, and the 705 gram weight helps on the climbs.
    Trek Fuel EX 9.8

  58. #58
    I am Walt
    Reputation: waltaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,232
    Quote Originally Posted by mlx john View Post
    Running a XR4 2.6 on the front of my FEX and a 2.4 XR3 on the rear.

    29er Line Pro 30's (29mm id)

    The 2.6 is perfect, so much more grip cornering. I was sliding out with the XR4 2.4 on the front, tire was too square.

    The XR3 on the rear hooks up well, and the 705 gram weight helps on the climbs.
    What are those actually measuring at?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Ride more; post less...

  59. #59
    Trail Rider
    Reputation: mlx john's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    806
    2.64
    2.44
    Trek Fuel EX 9.8

  60. #60
    I am Walt
    Reputation: waltaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,232
    Quote Originally Posted by mlx john View Post
    2.64
    2.44
    Thanks, man!
    Ride more; post less...

  61. #61
    WNC Native
    Reputation: nitrousjunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,407
    Quote Originally Posted by mlx john View Post
    Running a XR4 2.6 on the front of my FEX and a 2.4 XR3 on the rear.

    29er Line Pro 30's (29mm id)

    The 2.6 is perfect, so much more grip cornering. I was sliding out with the XR4 2.4 on the front, tire was too square.

    The XR3 on the rear hooks up well, and the 705 gram weight helps on the climbs.
    Do you have a weight on the XR4 2.6 also?
    "I ride to clear my head, my head is clearer when I'm riding SS. Therefore, I choose to ride SS."~ Fullrange Drew

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation: calzonical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    726
    Quote Originally Posted by nitrousjunky View Post
    Do you have a weight on the XR4 2.6 also?
    I have two XR4s 29x2.6 Team issue 120tpi - 922 grams and 943 grams. both mounted on Arc35 and are 66mm tread edge to edge - casing is 64mm - 13.5 and 15.5 psi.

    Awesome tires

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,400
    I was running 29 x 3 Minions, great tires but my son stole em. I swapped to XR 4 29 x 3, had some durability issues, swapped to XR4 29 x 2.6, durability issues continued, so I swapped to 29 x 2.6 Rekon 60tpi.

    The XR4 2.6 has more traction and it may be a little fatter in the casing, but the Rekon is holding up better to abuse. The Minion 29 x 3 gets the win for all around awesomeness.

    Iím waiting on delivery of a McFly 29 x 2.8 and a Chunk 29 x 2.6, depending on how they look in person, my plan is to keep a Rekon 2.6 out back and run the McFly up front. Not sure about the Chunk, wish it were 2.8 as itíd be a nice tire for the front with a 2.6 in back.

  64. #64
    Out spokin'
    Reputation: Sparticus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Posts
    8,437
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    I was running 29 x 3 Minions, great tires but my son stole em. I swapped to XR 4 29 x 3, had some durability issues, swapped to XR4 29 x 2.6, durability issues continued, so I swapped to 29 x 2.6 Rekon 60tpi.

    The XR4 2.6 has more traction and it may be a little fatter in the casing, but the Rekon is holding up better to abuse. The Minion 29 x 3 gets the win for all around awesomeness.

    Iím waiting on delivery of a McFly 29 x 2.8 and a Chunk 29 x 2.6, depending on how they look in person, my plan is to keep a Rekon 2.6 out back and run the McFly up front. Not sure about the Chunk, wish it were 2.8 as itíd be a nice tire for the front with a 2.6 in back.
    May I ask the reason you haven't gone back to the all around awesome Minion 29x3? I ask because my next bike will be 29+... trying to investigate rubber in advance. Thanks.
    =sParty
    disciplesofdirt.org

    We don't quit riding because we get old.
    We get old because we quit riding.

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,400
    3" tires, esp in a 29er are just too heavy to haul around on long days.

    I'd love to see a Minion 2.8, which may seem to some like a minimal difference, but having ridden 2.6 and 2.8 predominately in 27 and 29, I find the plus/minus size to be the most well rounded, esp if your doing long days in the saddle.

    Of course you could argue the same for 2.4, 2.2, etc... so I suppose what I'm saying is there is a point of diminishing returns where the weight, traction, support, efficency come together and for me it's 2.6-2.8 on an daily driver.

    I love 3" tires, rode them for years on muni, got em on my Hendrix, Wozo, and my wife's Levo, but they are heavy and slow, though they are good fun on the down and when creeping through rocky stuff.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sparticus View Post
    May I ask the reason you haven't gone back to the all around awesome Minion 29x3? I ask because my next bike will be 29+... trying to investigate rubber in advance. Thanks.
    =sParty

  66. #66
    Out spokin'
    Reputation: Sparticus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Posts
    8,437
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    3" tires, esp in a 29er are just too heavy to haul around on long days.

    I'd love to see a Minion 2.8, which may seem to some like a minimal difference, but having ridden 2.6 and 2.8 predominately in 27 and 29, I find the plus/minus size to be the most well rounded, esp if your doing long days in the saddle.

    Of course you could argue the same for 2.4, 2.2, etc... so I suppose what I'm saying is there is a point of diminishing returns where the weight, traction, support, efficency come together and for me it's 2.6-2.8 on an daily driver.

    I love 3" tires, rode them for years on muni, got em on my Hendrix, Wozo, and my wife's Levo, but they are heavy and slow, though they are good fun on the down and when creeping through rocky stuff.
    Thank you. I know what you're saying as I have 27.5x3" tires as a second wheelset for my Pistola. They are indeed heavy and slow compared to the 29x2.6" wheels/tires I run on the same frame when conditions are dry.

    What I like the 3" tires for is off season use in Oregon's mud and slippery roots & rocks, when extra weight doesn't matter and riding is comparatively slow motion. What I like least about the 27.5" hoops is they're too small -- bothers me more than their extra weight during the mud season.

    I also don't like subjecting my FS's pivots and suspension components to water & sludge half the year. So my solution will be a 29+ hardtail for the off season.

    Thanks again, Ben.
    =sParty
    disciplesofdirt.org

    We don't quit riding because we get old.
    We get old because we quit riding.

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,400
    Agreed, the 27.5 wheels are just too small, that's why I'm off the the little wheels and moving to 29ers again. A good 29er is not the ponderous things we rode in days gone by. I chased this young buck down Sierra Canyon the other day on my Full Stache while he was running a FS 27.5; I paced him just fine

    Quote Originally Posted by Sparticus View Post
    Thank you. I know what you're saying as I have 27.5x3" tires as a second wheelset for my Pistola. They are indeed heavy and slow compared to the 29x2.6" wheels/tires I run on the same frame when conditions are dry.

    What I like the 3" tires for is off season use in Oregon's mud and slippery roots & rocks, when extra weight doesn't matter and riding is comparatively slow motion. What I like least about the 27.5" hoops is they're too small -- bothers me more than their extra weight during the mud season.

    I also don't like subjecting my FS's pivots and suspension components to water & sludge half the year. So my solution will be a 29+ hardtail for the off season.

    Thanks again, Ben.
    =sParty

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    320
    I have a 2019 Stumpjumper Comp Alloy 29 on order for early June. My first ever FS bike and it comes stock with 29x2.6's, I'm beyond stoked.

Similar Threads

  1. Need some info on these high wheelers
    By TraxFactory in forum Vintage, Retro, Classic
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-02-2014, 06:01 AM
  2. Wheelers MTB Holidays in Lousa, Portugal
    By hughjayteens in forum Passion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-07-2014, 05:14 PM
  3. 4 wheelers on Jim Branch trail 10-1
    By Muxherdlr in forum North & South Carolina
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-03-2013, 04:54 PM
  4. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 02-26-2011, 10:06 AM
  5. Subaru outback or VW Jetta Wagon TDI?
    By airbag in forum Cars and Bike Racks
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 01-14-2011, 05:51 PM

Members who have read this thread: 637

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

mtbr.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.