Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 67

Thread: Pivot Mach 6

  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306

    Cool-blue Rhythm Pivot Mach 6

    My Christmas present!

    - Pivot Mach 6 with Pike 160mm
    - 11.9kg without pedals

    Pivot Mach 6-m6_1.jpg

    Pivot Mach 6-m6_2.jpg

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ScottW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,198
    That's a good looking bike.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Madman43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    303
    Nice bike and good choice! Enjoy

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: robertj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    401
    Wow, nice ride! Hope you get the tires scratching around on some dirt today too!

  5. #5
    One Cog Short
    Reputation: PricklyPete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    79

    Pivot Mach 6

    Beautiful!

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jgutz71's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    164
    bike porn...purty bike
    Stumpy FSR Comp 29er
    SC Bronson C

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    703
    The Pivot Mach 6 is the best 27.5(650b) bike out! Haters will hate...

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306
    Thanks guys! This rig is awesome!

  9. #9
    it's the ride....
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    530
    Chris that's an awesome rig. What is the component set up?
    Can't wait your ride report. Bring it on to Mt Kiara KL, I'm sure that will be the right habitat for Mach 6
    Ulating blencong sejatine tataraning lelaku...

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    984
    A friend of mine just bought that bike and switched out the fox for the Pike. Unfortunately he's been waiting for the Pike so is currently unable to ride the bike!

    Out of curiosity, what made you go with the Pike?

    Nice bike for sure.
    Locals' Guide to North Shore Rides http://mtbtrails.ca/

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,813
    To the OP nice bike. Enjoy...

    Quote Originally Posted by gunt pimp View Post
    Haters will hate...
    +1 - the Mach 6 hate in this thread is so thick you could cut it with a sword!
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306

    Pivot Mach 6 XX1

    Short write-up on my new mistress: My Pivot Mach 6

    Pivot Mach 6-2014-01-11-13.14.20_resized.jpg

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: KRob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    11,246
    Great build. Wow. Very nice. I really enjoyed the detailed build and pics on your blog.

    I also dig the name: Two wheels good.... Indeed. (And I'd have to agree with the "Four wheels bad" part too,, if you're talking about quads.)
    Last edited by KRob; 01-13-2014 at 09:54 PM.
    I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth...
    Isaiah 58:14

    www.stuckinthespokes.com

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation: robertj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    401
    That was a fun read, enjoy! I'm having an absolute blast on mine!

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    310
    The Mach 6 might be the best looking bike out there right now. Pivot really knows how to design a bike. I demoed one in September and loved it. A tad out of my price range or it would be at the top of my list.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306
    Thanks guy! great bike indeed. Keep riding

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306

    Pivot Mach 6 XX1


  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,529
    Are you sure on that weight? That's almost "too" light to believe. I'm not saying you're incorrect, its just that is lighter than the magazine reviews came out with.
    We Ride In God's Country!

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,813
    Quote Originally Posted by myitch View Post
    Are you sure on that weight? That's almost "too" light to believe. I'm not saying you're incorrect, its just that is lighter than the magazine reviews came out with.
    11.9kgs = 26.24lbs without pedals.

    The MTBR test Mach 6 was reported as 26.5lbs without pedals.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    310
    Great video. Seems like your enjoying your M6. Those look like some great trails you got there. Nice skills as well.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,529
    Just curious. Have you put it on a scale? I mean that's lighter than my TRc and that frame weighs less than 5 lbs. Just saying
    We Ride In God's Country!

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306
    We weigh the full bike in the workshop after it was built. It shows 11.9 kg. Should have taken a photo. Will do that next time.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306
    Atl-biker, we indeed have nice trails here. M6 is the best bike I ever ridden. It really climb like XC and down like DH. Awesome bike!

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,813
    Quote Originally Posted by myitch View Post
    Just curious. Have you put it on a scale? I mean that's lighter than my TRc and that frame weighs less than 5 lbs. Just saying



    MTBR test bike 26.43lbs = 11.99kg
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: robertj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    401
    Cool vid, trails look fun! That's a great weight for such a capable bike!

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,529
    OMG. You weren't kidding. I don't get it. And so it's light than my 2x10 XT Stans Crest TRc.
    We Ride In God's Country!

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,813
    Quote Originally Posted by myitch View Post
    OMG. You weren't kidding. I don't get it. And so it's light than my 2x10 XT Stans Crest TRc.
    I think the MTBR folks have a lighter fork and wheelset for the m6, but I haven't seen a weight for that setup.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,529
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    I think the MTBR folks have a lighter fork and wheelset for the m6, but I haven't seen a weight for that setup.
    Is that with/wo a dropper post? And those aren't crazy light rims on there either. Dang, this could be the one do-it-all bike with that weight. With pedals should be about 28ish I'm guessing
    We Ride In God's Country!

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,813
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    11.9kgs = 26.24lbs without pedals.

    The MTBR test Mach 6 was reported as 26.5lbs without pedals.
    Quote Originally Posted by myitch View Post
    Is that with/wo a dropper post? And those aren't crazy light rims on there either. Dang, this could be the one do-it-all bike with that weight. With pedals should be about 28ish I'm guessing
    That weight is with a dropper.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306
    Mine is with KS internal cable dropper. I use Pike fork, which is lighter than MTBR M6 using Fox CTD fork.

    My setup:

    1. Frame: Pivot Mach 6 Carbon, Medium
    2. Shock: Fox Float X CTD Kashima
    3. Fork: RockShox Pike RCT3 Solo Air Forks (1861g)
    4. Headset: Pivot Precision Sealed Bearing
    5. RD: XX-1 11Spd Type 2
    6. Shifter: XX-1 rear
    7. Brakes: Magura MT-8
    8. Crank: XX-1 GXP 30T (with Raceface crank protector)
    9. Bar: Enve Carbon Riser 740mm
    10. Grips: Lock On
    11. Stem: Straitline Pinch Clamp Stem 50mm Red
    12. Post: KS dropper internal cable
    13. Saddle: Pivot WTB Vigo Team
    14. Cassette: XX-1 10-42 11Spd
    15. Wheelset: DT 27.5 SPLINE ONE XM 1501 XD Tubeless
    16. Tyre: KENDA Nevegal 2.35 front and rear

    TOTAL weight without pedals: 11.9kg

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Salespunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,278
    Mine is 27.75 lbs with dropper and pedals for a decently burly build. That also includes real tires, not some 500 gram paper thin sidewall XC tires. Could still drop another .25-.5 lbs too by going to a Wolftooth spiderless ring and a few other tricks.

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    310
    Quote Originally Posted by chris9888 View Post
    Atl-biker, we indeed have nice trails here. M6 is the best bike I ever ridden. It really climb like XC and down like DH. Awesome bike!
    Yeah, that climb you cleared looked pretty f'n steep with some nice tech. Well done. I know video's usually make things look easier than in person. If that's the case that must have been a tough one.

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306
    Quote Originally Posted by Atl-Biker View Post
    Yeah, that climb you cleared looked pretty f'n steep with some nice tech. Well done. I know video's usually make things look easier than in person. If that's the case that must have been a tough one.
    That slope is really freaking steep and tech. You are right, video does not do justice.

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,813
    Quote Originally Posted by Salespunk View Post
    Mine is 27.75 lbs with dropper and pedals for a decently burly build. That also includes real tires, not some 500 gram paper thin sidewall XC tires. Could still drop another .25-.5 lbs too by going to a Wolftooth spiderless ring and a few other tricks.
    And the M6 isn't a featherweight frame. It's nice to see parts come down in weight enough for a light, but purposeful build.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jgusta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,893
    Quote Originally Posted by chris9888 View Post
    Mine is with KS internal cable dropper. I use Pike fork, which is lighter than MTBR M6 using Fox CTD fork.

    My setup:

    1. Frame: Pivot Mach 6 Carbon, Medium
    2. Shock: Fox Float X CTD Kashima
    3. Fork: RockShox Pike RCT3 Solo Air Forks (1861g)
    4. Headset: Pivot Precision Sealed Bearing
    5. RD: XX-1 11Spd Type 2
    6. Shifter: XX-1 rear
    7. Brakes: Magura MT-8
    8. Crank: XX-1 GXP 30T (with Raceface crank protector)
    9. Bar: Enve Carbon Riser 740mm
    10. Grips: Lock On
    11. Stem: Straitline Pinch Clamp Stem 50mm Red
    12. Post: KS dropper internal cable
    13. Saddle: Pivot WTB Vigo Team
    14. Cassette: XX-1 10-42 11Spd
    15. Wheelset: DT 27.5 SPLINE ONE XM 1501 XD Tubeless
    16. Tyre: KENDA Nevegal 2.35 front and rear

    TOTAL weight without pedals: 11.9kg
    Is the Pike a 150 or 160 fork and do you ever feel like you need to steepen the front and/or back end on steep climbs if using fixed travel fork? It looks like the M6 is based around a 150 fork, but I typically like to drop my front ends on bikes with <67 HTA (my Rune has 65 deg HTA, but steep STA and still need to drop the fork for the steeps). Would just run a 160-130 Pike, but don't want the BB any higher. Have always loved the frame, but BB >13.5" and slack STA for seating climbing kind of turned me off. Will be testing one thoroughly in 2.5 weeks!
    Ride On!

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306
    Quote Originally Posted by jgusta View Post
    Is the Pike a 150 or 160 fork and do you ever feel like you need to steepen the front and/or back end on steep climbs if using fixed travel fork? It looks like the M6 is based around a 150 fork, but I typically like to drop my front ends on bikes with <67 HTA (my Rune has 65 deg HTA, but steep STA and still need to drop the fork for the steeps). Would just run a 160-130 Pike, but don't want the BB any higher. Have always loved the frame, but BB >13.5" and slack STA for seating climbing kind of turned me off. Will be testing one thoroughly in 2.5 weeks!
    I am using Pike 160. Riders' preference varies, the setup works perfect for my riding style. Personally, I think M6 geo is perfect for all round rides. The 66 HTA and shorter chain stay combo is ingenious. Awesome climb and DH capabilities. It also improves tight switchback and corner performances. I think M6 BB height is relatively low, which add stability.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    18
    How well does it climb on the steep stuff? I hear its better to slam your stem and not use any spacers for climbing. Nice ride btw i am looking at this or the HDR but i think i am leaning more towards the m6. The only thing i am worried about is the head tube angle being to slack for steeper climbs.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,813
    You might want to check out the Pivot sub-forum...there is a lot of M6 discussion going on there that covers these questions.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306
    Shredding trails with our Pivot Mach 6 this Saturday

    Pivot Mach 6-20140208_142235_resized.jpg

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306
    Think this is how we should ride our M6
    Pivot Mach 6-m6-jump.jpg

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    16
    Ever look at the Santa Cruz Bronson? I am currently looking at the Mach 6 and the Bronson, I ride in NJ which has its share of technical trails. I don't mind climbing but I ultimately ride to go fast downhill. That being said in order to ride DH I must go up the long climbs first. Any advice for me trying to decide between the two? Is this the bike that I will be taking on all my rides, technical or not? Current Bike: Superfly 100 Pro with KS Lev Dropper and Mavic Wheelset.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306
    Jferr31910, I had the same dilemma sometime back. Glad to go for M6, can never be happier. Pivot M6 is a fun bike, and performs well in technical trails, climb and DH. You will be surprised M6 handles DH so much better, thanks to 66 degree HTA and DW-Link suspension system. In addition, the shorter-chain stay and lower BB height enables you to take DH corners quick with absolute confident. I am average rider, but M6 enable me to attempt stunt I never did on my Nomad. I ride faster with more confident. The bonus, it climbs like goat and put many XC riders to shame.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    984
    Quote Originally Posted by jgusta View Post
    Is the Pike a 150 or 160 fork and do you ever feel like you need to steepen the front and/or back end on steep climbs if using fixed travel fork? It looks like the M6 is based around a 150 fork,
    Mach6 comes with the fox 34 150 which has the same axle to crown as the Pike 160 so you only gain by upgrading to the pike.
    Locals' Guide to North Shore Rides http://mtbtrails.ca/

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jgusta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,893
    Quote Originally Posted by Brodiegrrl View Post
    Mach6 comes with the fox 34 150 which has the same axle to crown as the Pike 160 so you only gain by upgrading to the pike.
    Thanks, but think 34 150 is 544mm a2c, whereas 160 Pike is 552.5mm. So, 160 Pike would result in about 1/2 degree slacker on the front and back end (65.5/71) and raise bike about 1/8" (13.7"). Pretty much similar geomety as my old SB66 w/160 fork which felt a bit too high and too slack when climbing and descending burmy, flowy terrain. This resulted in me often descending with it in the lowered fork position (130), which wasn't enough travel in most instances descending and eventually ended up blowing up the DP dampener cause of it. Too bad they don't make a Pike 150/120, cause I think that would be best for that bike, if you do long grinds to descend of course.
    Ride On!

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by chris9888 View Post
    Jferr31910, I had the same dilemma sometime back. Glad to go for M6, can never be happier. Pivot M6 is a fun bike, and performs well in technical trails, climb and DH. You will be surprised M6 handles DH so much better, thanks to 66 degree HTA and DW-Link suspension system. In addition, the shorter-chain stay and lower BB height enables you to take DH corners quick with absolute confident. I am average rider, but M6 enable me to attempt stunt I never did on my Nomad. I ride faster with more confident. The bonus, it climbs like goat and put many XC riders to shame.
    I appreciate the reponse. I checked out your videos and I think Im going to pick up the M6 in a xsmall frame. Once again thanks for the feedback.

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chris9888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306
    Quote Originally Posted by Jferr31910 View Post
    I appreciate the reponse. I checked out your videos and I think Im going to pick up the M6 in a xsmall frame. Once again thanks for the feedback.
    You are welcome! I am sure you will enjoy the M6, more than any other bikes

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,813
    Quote Originally Posted by jgusta View Post
    Thanks, but think 34 150 is 544mm a2c, whereas 160 Pike is 552.5mm.
    Once you set 30% sag you've got 381mm vs. 387mm or ~6mm difference. So I'm with B-Grrl the Pike is an upgrade with nearly the same A to C.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jgusta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,893
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    Once you set 30% sag you've got 381mm vs. 387mm or ~6mm difference. So I'm with B-Grrl the Pike is an upgrade with nearly the same A to C.
    Pike 150 is going to yield similar geometry to 34 150 of course. Only 6mm raise at BB is slight, but I have noticed it negatively when running my Lyrik at 170 vs 160, especially while cornering. And 1/2" slacker at seat tube, combined with slacker front by 1/2 degree will make you work a bit more to try to get your weight over the front wheel for cornering, climbing and what not. So, for this I would be more inclined to only use a 150 fork on this bike.
    Ride On!

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,813
    Quote Originally Posted by jgusta View Post
    Pike 150 is going to yield similar geometry to 34 150 of course. Only 6mm raise at BB is slight, but I have noticed it negatively when running my Lyrik at 170 vs 160, especially while cornering. And 1/2" slacker at seat tube, combined with slacker front by 1/2 degree will make you work a bit more to try to get your weight over the front wheel for cornering, climbing and what not. So, for this I would be more inclined to only use a 150 fork on this bike.
    160mm Pike will not raise the BB by 6mm when the rider is on the bike vs. a Fox 150. If the front end goes up 6mm that's 0.25 of a deg slacker and the BB will only go up by a couple mm.

    Pretty negligible changes IMO.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jgusta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,893
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    160mm Pike will not raise the BB by 6mm when the rider is on the bike vs. a Fox 150. If the front end goes up 6mm that's 0.25 of a deg slacker and the BB will only go up by a couple mm.

    Pretty negligible changes IMO.
    Interesting and good to know, cause I would really want to run a 160/130 Pike instead of 150 Pike on that for the long grinds we have. Testing in 5 days for 24hrs of high desert, rocky thrashing!
    Ride On!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Pivot Mach 427 - Mach 4 conversion
    By kleinhead in forum Pivot Cycles
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-24-2015, 02:14 PM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-13-2013, 10:04 AM
  3. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 09-27-2013, 01:55 PM
  4. Pivot Mach 5.7 pivot periodic maintenance
    By LeeL in forum Pivot Cycles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-10-2012, 10:03 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-21-2012, 06:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •