Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GMONEY80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    44

    Breezer Repack Pre-production model review

    First off I would like to say thank you to Breezer bikes, ASI and our Breezer rep steve nagelkerke for this opportunity to demo the repack. Also I am in no way affiliated with ASI or Breezer nor was I in any way paid to do this review so now that that is out of the way let's get to it.

    As most of you know if you are reading this, the Breezer Repack is an all new dual suspension 650b/27.5" 160mm Enduro/Trail bike that Breezer will be offering in their lineup for 2014. When they first announced this bike I have to say I was skeptical. First off they haven't done any suspension stuff and they were jumping into a brand new proprietary suspension design that has a link in the middle of the chain stay. All I thought was "wow is this thing going to be flexy" but when I found out that the suspension design was being engineered by Soto group, the guys behind some of the best suspension designs around it kind of set my mind at ease before testing. Also If you have to ask who or what the Breezer brand is well just look up their storied history online because i don't have the time or energy to post all that. Now I am not a professional reviewer, you could probably tell that already by my poor writing skills but i will try to be as detailed as possible. I am a bike guy, I have worked in the bike industry for the last 12 years and have ridden or owned everything from big box brand bikes to smaller what I like to call "craft" bike brands and have had good to very poor experiences on quite a few different bikes. Now I have been a riding 29" wheeled bikes for the last 5 years so getting on something smaller(at least to me)again was intriguing.

    The spec on the Breezer Repack team is respectable, full and I mean full XT components from top to bottom, they even used XT hubs and XT center lock ice tech rotors to round out the build. Now some things that were changed from the original spec were as follows: The handlebar that was specced was a Ritchey and it had an unusual rise and sweep so it was changed out for an Easton haven carbon, the stem was changed from a Ritchey to an Easton havoc aluminum stem in a 0 deg 65mm length, that was done because we have a few different guys demoing this bike so some of us shorter people(i am 5'9 on a good day)could use a shorter stem. The seat post was a standard aluminum non dropper seat post, that was changed out to a KS LEV courtesy of our Breezer rep Steve(thanks a ton Steve!) also before I forget to mention this, the frame we were demoing was a size Large or 19.5". Now on to the ride report.

    Breezer Repack Pre-production model review-iphone-9-27-13-177.jpg

    After installing my trusty M780 XT pedals I was off to ride a spot I know best, Ute Valley park. Now for those of you that aren't familiar with Ute valley it combines rocky technical trail with fast fire road twisty switchbacks which I find appropriate for demoing the Repack. The first thing i noticed about the Repack is that in its current iteration it is a pig at about 32 lbs. with pedals but this is a pre production model and the Breezer reps have assured us that it will be lighter in the production model when it is released early next year. Let me say that for a 6+ inch travel bike this thing climbs incredibly well, and not just for a 6' bike but just period, it is very stable out of the saddle, no pedal feedback and zero and i mean zero flex from the rear suspension. The rear shock is a 2014 fox CTD Kashima coated shock which I have not been a fan of. I have the same shock on on my current trail bike which is a 2013 tallboy LT. What I noticed is that I did not have to ride this shock in the climb mode at all, it remained stable even when doing step ups I did not feel any feedback from the suspension. This was nice because I didn't have to constantly reach down to adjust my shock for different ride types, and like most everyone I always forget to change my shock back to open during descents. Cornering was a plus as well, I attribute this to the 27.5" wheels more than the bike itself because my current ride is not the best at railing corners because of the sheer size of it. You can really put weight in corners with this thing and the 2.35" nobby nic tires that came stock on the bike keep the rubber connected with the dirt phenomenally well, now I do have a couple issues with nobby nic tires and this is purely my opinion but they don't make a very good front tire, they wear quickly and they rebound way to fast so running them at a low pressure is key. Now it does make for one of the best rear tires around because of the grip they provide and they really dig in while climbing. One thing I did notice is that the steering is a little twitchy probably because I was riding a large and had to run a shorter stem but it is worth mentioning.

    Breezer Repack Pre-production model review-iphone-9-27-13-172.jpg

    Descending on this bike is where the true magic lies, it is very stable and efficient. The M link suspension never felt slow or sloppy, it felt connected and controlled around and over every rock and root. Pick a line, point the bike and enjoy the ride, it doesn't ride a straight line quite as well as my tallboy mostly due to the larger wheels and the VPP suspension being so damn smooth while descending but it doesn't feel like a typical 6" travel bike, it just doesn't and I mean that in a good way, it is light, nimble and highly flickable even for it being 32 Lbs. The magic also happens in the XT brakes, it comes setup with 180mm rotors front and rear so their is plenty of stopping power provided. One thing that i noticed as well is that Fox finally did their homework because the 2014 float feels a lot smoother and has much less brake dive than its predecessors but that being said a Rock Shox Pike would have been nice(just saying!)So i guess to sum it all up, I would say that I really like what Breezer has done here, the geometry even for a bike that was larger than what I would use was spot on, it climbs, corners and descends remarkably well which not many bikes do.

    Breezer Repack Pre-production model review-iphone-9-27-13-174.jpg

    Below are my pros and cons:

    Pros:
    Great geometry
    Pretty good build spec for this price point(also listed in cons)
    Very efficient climbing platform
    No flex from the rear suspension when being pushed to its max

    Cons:
    Heavy, but being resolved in the production model.
    Handlebar, stem, front tire and seat post selection
    A little twitchy while cornering(again probably my setup)
    Maybe a change to Rock Shox suspension
    A carbon model(not really a con but I could imagine how sweet that would be)

    Thanks again Breezer bikes for this opportunity!

    Breezer Repack Pre-production model review-iphone-9-27-13-175.jpg
    Last edited by GMONEY80; 09-28-2013 at 08:55 AM.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: doismellbacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,938
    Nice review.
    Joe's a class act....hope he does well with these. Just learned a few days ago that one of my LBSs will be carrying this line....look forward to checking them out.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cotharyus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,523
    Let me ask you this - does the bike pedal and climb well enough to take out on long XC rides that go through big chunk, or is this thing going to get old anywhere you don't have a lift? If it falls somewhere in the middle, you can say so. I love my XC bike, but there are places it just can't go once it's been ridden there. I'm eyeing this bike (and have been since it was announced) with some combination of hope, skepticism, weariness, and lust.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GMONEY80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    44
    It is definitely an in between bike, it is not light enough to be an xc bike but that could change, but it climbs better than any 160mm travel bike i have ever ridden. When i was riding it i kept forgetting that it was 160mm travel bike which with most bikes in that weight and travel range you never forget you are riding a big bike. Their was a lot to like with the pre-production model and it should only get better once they start rolling out on showroom floors.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: trailbildr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,278
    Riding Ute in RockShox's back yard with Fox stuff? I'm surprised you didn't get jumped and provided excellent customer service in the middle of your ride!

    Thanks for the write-up. We'll have to wait and see how the production stuff shakes out. Joe Breeze is a great guy to be sure.

    mk
    TrailWerks Cyclery
    TrailWerks Suspension Service

    trailwerkssuspension.com
    trailwerkscyclery.com

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cotharyus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,523
    Interesting, thanks.

  7. #7
    horn doggie
    Reputation: scooderdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    799
    Quote Originally Posted by GMONEY80 View Post
    It is definitely an in between bike, it is not light enough to be an xc bike but that could change, but it climbs better than any 160mm travel bike i have ever ridden. When i was riding it i kept forgetting that it was 160mm travel bike which with most bikes in that weight and travel range you never forget you are riding a big bike. Their was a lot to like with the pre-production model and it should only get better once they start rolling out on showroom floors.
    Nice write up!

    I also rode the (likely) very same preproduction Large Repack that you did. We did some A/B comparisons with a Trek Slash, also a 6" bike intended for AM and Enduro type racing, in Oakland's Joaquin Miller park about a month ago. My background is as a former XC racer, turned DH racer (Cat 1), turned Super-D racer.

    Here's the first clip recorded while chasing another rider down Cinderella Trail, a fairly rough DH-oriented single track trail. I'd never descended on the bike before this moment, and had simply ridden it 15 minutes or so to get to the start. Like you, I immediately noted how pedal strokes move the bike forward, and that I never needed to engage the Propedal in the rear - it simply did not bob.

    Breezer Repack demo - Cinderella trail, Joaquin Miller park, Oakland, CA - YouTube


    And here's another short clip heading down upper Palos Colorado trail, a root and rut rich descent. I took an alternative line, because I could on this bike.

    Breezer Repack demo - upper Palos Colorado trail, Joaquin Miller park, Oakland, CA - YouTube


    Finally, this is a fun clip for me as I try to catch up with friends, but not knowing which leg of the trail they took. You can catch a glimpse or two of red and orange jerseys on the trail on the other side of the creek, but you'll have to look fast!

    Breezer Repack demo - a run down Sinawik trail, Joaquin Miller park, Oakland, CA - YouTube
    Wanted:

    Potts, Potts, Potts

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GMONEY80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    44
    Cool, glad you liked it. Did it still have the KS lev seatpost on it? We put that on at our shop hopefully it stayed.

Similar Threads

  1. bike frame production model
    By urmb in forum Bike and Frame discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-22-2013, 02:33 AM
  2. AC 29er 140mm now a production model
    By The_Lecht_Rocks in forum Nicolai
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-10-2012, 05:58 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-22-2012, 05:04 PM
  4. Repack!
    By Hikers Only in forum California - Norcal
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 04-09-2012, 09:54 AM
  5. repack at speed
    By btheb in forum Videos and POV Cameras
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-23-2011, 01:01 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •