Page 2 of 22 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 100 of 1088
  1. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bikeny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,715
    Quote Originally Posted by max-a-mill View Post
    anyone know what version of the vee rubber tire AE is selling, can't seem to tell from their site?

    here are the three models listed on the vee rubber website for the trax fatty:
    $100- 293.0 (WB, 72 TPI) (Weight: 1025)
    $110- 293.0 (FB, 72 TPI) (Weight: 950)
    $120- 293.0 (FB, 120 TPI) (Weight: 920)

    tread pattern looks decent (though i'd like a tire with deeper knobs for fall/winter). I liked all the regular vee rubber tires i have tried so far so i am hoping this is a winner.
    It's the last one on your list. Says right in the listing, 120tpi folding bead.

  2. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,694
    doh reading... I FAIL.

    thanks!!!

  3. #53
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8,941
    Just caught wind of those last night.

    Here are the specs:

    FT/RR/PR : Dual
    Size : 29 x 3.00
    TPI : 120
    Durometer : 62a/60a
    Bead : Aramid
    Type : TLR/Clincher
    Color : Black
    Weight : 850g

    And here's a pic:



    The bad news? ETA of 12/8/14.

    That said, I've been riding the Chronicles for a ~month. I tend to reserve this bike/these tires for mellower trips where float is necessary and techy chunk isn't as prevalent. So far so good, especially the tubelessness.

  4. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    489
    Any idea on the measured width of the bontrager tire? How do you like the maxis tire? What width rim are you using with it?

    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    Just caught wind of those last night.

    Here are the specs:

    FT/RR/PR : Dual
    Size : 29 x 3.00
    TPI : 120
    Durometer : 62a/60a
    Bead : Aramid
    Type : TLR/Clincher
    Color : Black
    Weight : 850g

    And here's a pic:



    The bad news? ETA of 12/8/14.

    That said, I've been riding the Chronicles for a ~month. I tend to reserve this bike/these tires for mellower trips where float is necessary and techy chunk isn't as prevalent. So far so good, especially the tubelessness.
    Quote Originally Posted by meltingfeather View Post
    If I told you I saw a unicorn ****ing a leprechaun trail side, you'd probably be suspicious.

  5. #55
    74 & 29 pilot
    Reputation: MTB Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,253
    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    Just caught wind of those last night.

    Here are the specs:

    FT/RR/PR : Dual
    Size : 29 x 3.00
    TPI : 120
    Durometer : 62a/60a
    Bead : Aramid
    Type : TLR/Clincher
    Color : Black
    Weight : 850g
    Thanks Mikesee! That is sweet; I love Bonti tires!

    Got the Fat Trax today and will mount it later on my Derby 35mm wide rim to see if it fits in my Fox 32 that has a 29/3.0 Knard in it now.


    MTBP
    "GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!"
    Turn on the truth: http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/

  6. #56
    74 & 29 pilot
    Reputation: MTB Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,253
    So, I realize these are on a 35/29mm rim, but the size of the Fatty Trax is a little disappointing compared to the Knard on the same rim. The only good thing about the smaller size is that it actually fit in the back of my Les with 2.5mm on each side! If I had a few more millimeters on each side, I'd cancel my Gnarvester; Plenty of room for the diameter of the tire. Also, the Fatty clears on the fork bridge by a few more millimeters. Both tires were measured at 30 psi on the exact same rim, right after mounted and before being ridden.

    Knard 3.0 on Derby wide rim:
    knob to knob


    casing


    Fatty Trax on Derby wide rim:
    knob to knob


    casing


    2014 Fox 32 Float 120mm clearance:




    Comparison of the two on Derby wide rims:



    So, my tire came in 40gr lighter than advertised, but I think it's because they shorted me on tread. The casing is quite wider than the tread, and will grow even more on a 50mm wide rim. It will be a good, fast rolling rear tire on my Derby's until I build some 50mm rims; When someone makes some carbon hoops. The Trax Fatty, was a little tougher to get on the rim, but not really hard. They also seated and held air without Stan's, which the Knard would not hold air due to leaking around the bead.

    Can't wait to build my Gnarvester and take full advantage of this setup!
    MTBP
    "GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!"
    Turn on the truth: http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/

  7. #57
    29er
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    859
    Have you ridden the trax yet?

  8. #58
    74 & 29 pilot
    Reputation: MTB Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,253
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan GSR View Post
    Have you ridden the trax yet?
    Not really, just on the street. I did take it on a fairly steep pea sized loose gravel walking path at a really slow speed and a relatively high torque; No slippage.

    Not sure I want to ride it on my Les on real trails, as the clearance is pretty minimal.
    MTBP
    "GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!"
    Turn on the truth: http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/

  9. #59
    29er
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    859
    Im interested as a front tire

  10. #60
    74 & 29 pilot
    Reputation: MTB Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,253
    No, I mounted it on front, but the narrower tread patch doesn't seem like it will have very good bite when leaning. Maybe, when I get some 50mm rims.

    I could be wrong though, as I am most of the time.
    MTBP
    "GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!"
    Turn on the truth: http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/

  11. #61
    29er
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    859
    It's bigger than the ardent 2.4 I'm also considering

  12. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,102
    anxious to see these mounted on a 50 or 45mm rim. They look more aggressive than I had pictured, and I question whether anybody needs knobs pointed 90* to the right or left, but it does seem to have a pronounced shoulder where the knobbage stops.

  13. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bikeny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,715
    MTB Pilot: I can't tell from your pictures, but is the Knard brand new as well, and just mounted? Just asking because new tires will grow after a couple of days of being aired up, and tires this big could easily grow 3mm to 5mm wider and taller.

  14. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    435
    Mike - do you have any idea when the Chronicle will be available for sale?

  15. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,614
    Question for those of you who have been following the 29+ tire saga closely...I'm running 120tpi Knards on my Krampus at the moment. For the most part I am happy, but there are some scenarios where I wouldn't mind some extra bite...particularly at the side of the tire. Initial reports about the 26" Dirt Wizard are that it's got an aggressive tread with great traction at the expense of being slow rolling.

    My 29+ rig mostly sees touring use so I don't want a slow rolling tire.

    I'm hoping that there is a compromise option that has decent side knobs without going fully knobby - which in a 3" tire is overkill for my needs.

    Any thoughts on which 29+ tires might fit the bill?
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  16. #66
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8,941
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    Question for those of you who have been following the 29+ tire saga closely...I'm running 120tpi Knards on my Krampus at the moment. For the most part I am happy, but there are some scenarios where I wouldn't mind some extra bite...particularly at the side of the tire. Initial reports about the 26" Dirt Wizard are that it's got an aggressive tread with great traction at the expense of being slow rolling.

    My 29+ rig mostly sees touring use so I don't want a slow rolling tire.

    I'm hoping that there is a compromise option that has decent side knobs without going fully knobby - which in a 3" tire is overkill for my needs.

    Any thoughts on which 29+ tires might fit the bill?
    FWIW, the current 26" Dirt Wizard tread isn't the same as the upcoming 29". At least that's what I've been told. Casing will be bigger too--full 3" instead of 2.75".

    Trax Fatty's seem to have decent side knobs. Haven't ridden them yet.

    Chronicle seems to be the best overall combo of speed and bite that I've actually been able to see/fondle/ride.

  17. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    FWIW, the current 26" Dirt Wizard tread isn't the same as the upcoming 29". At least that's what I've been told. Casing will be bigger too--full 3" instead of 2.75".

    Trax Fatty's seem to have decent side knobs. Haven't ridden them yet.

    Chronicle seems to be the best overall combo of speed and bite that I've actually been able to see/fondle/ride.


    Thanks Mike. I'll keep an eye out for the Chronicle. I have enough life left in my Knards to get me through the rest of the year.

    Interesting to hear your comments on a different version of the DWs for 29+. Hopefully we'll see 'em this year.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  18. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fixgeardan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,076
    I want to know about casing thickness? Are all these new tires as wimpy in the casing
    as the Knards? Judging by the weight I would think so. Ill just stick with the Minions I think.

  19. #69
    74 & 29 pilot
    Reputation: MTB Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,253
    Quote Originally Posted by bikeny View Post
    MTB Pilot: I can't tell from your pictures, but is the Knard brand new as well, and just mounted? Just asking because new tires will grow after a couple of days of being aired up, and tires this big could easily grow 3mm to 5mm wider and taller.
    Yes, both tires were new and measured about 10 mins after being inflated to 30 psi. The Knard has about 12 miles on it now. I will re measure both of these tires after I build the Gnarvester and get some miles on the tires.

    The casing on the Trax Fatty felt quite a bit sturdier than the Knard.
    MTBP
    "GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!"
    Turn on the truth: http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/

  20. #70
    get down!
    Reputation: appleSSeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,183
    Rode my Vee Trax fatty last night and enjoyed it. It was moist/wet here and also dry in parts. A good overall test. Set up tubeless on my Duallies but burped and burped and burped until I was rolling back to the car on a half aired drag tire.

    Grip was great. Tubeless setup was great. No complaints at all except with the Velocity rim and the tubeless set up. Will get tubes tonight before I head out for SSUSA.

    Rudy Projects look ridiculous

    visit my blog, BEATS, BIKES & LIFE

  21. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fixgeardan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,076
    That's what I figured. For where I ride and how I ride Ill stick with Minions.
    Thanks

  22. #72
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8,941
    Quote Originally Posted by fixgeardan View Post
    I want to know about casing thickness? Are all these new tires as wimpy in the casing
    as the Knards? Judging by the weight I would think so. Ill just stick with the Minions I think.
    Nothing in 29+ will ever approach your Minion casings for durability. If they did no one would buy them because they'd be 1500g+.

    That said, both Trax Fatty and Chronicle casings seem much improved over the paper-thin Knards.

  23. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by appleSSeed View Post
    Grip was great. Tubeless setup was great. No complaints at all except with the Velocity rim and the tubeless set up.
    Hahaha! I feel your pain on the duallys.

    Vikb the chronicle looks like the way to go if they ever release them. Im very intersted in that bonty. that pattern looks like a fast rolling tire.

  24. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TahoeBC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,489
    Chronicle Review, hopefully they will be available soon

    First Look! – Maxxis Chronicle 29+ Tire | FAT-BIKE.COM
    Go get that KOM "You Deserve" - http://www.digitalepo.com/index.php

  25. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    76
    Mtbpilot those tires actually make derbys look kinda normal. I know on my 650b derbys the tires look tiny compared to the rim.

  26. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    37
    A width of 2.7"/69mm is just about right for many standard 29er forks which allows for many more potential customers. I don't really get why no one made that size before 29+ was a thing. My current Vee Rubber Mission 2.4 actually has a 2.25/57mm casing on a 21mm ID rim but my Flyxii FK-8 rigid fork has room for 70mm. Big 2.4 tires get up to about 63mm on a 30mm ID rim but that is still short of what I want.

  27. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    76
    Got my trax fattys mounted up yesterday. Took them out for a spin this morning. The narrow tread pattern gives up nothing to the knards. They roll just as good and have just as much if not more cornering grip. Mine weighed in at 900 grams dead on. On my duallies they measured 2.75 block to block and 2.95 at the casing. I set them up tubeless aired up to 50psi and let them sit overnight to stretch them out. Settled on 14psi front and 16 rear. I will drop down to 12 front and 14 rear on the next ride. The sidewall on them is much beefier then 120tpi knards.

  28. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    76
    got a couple more rides in since mounting them up. found that they are a little more picky with pressure then the knards. ive settled on 13f 15r. i rode the second outing with 12 and 14. at 12 the front would burp ever so slightly on the dually when standing and cranking up hill. my krampus is setup ss. this eventually left me in around 8 psi by the end of my 15 mile loop. at this super low pressure the rolling resistance ramped way up and felt like i was dragging a tank. also at lower pressures they tend to have an auto steer effect. this goes away at higher pressures. at the 13/15 combo they roll fast and grip really well in the turns but ride a little harsher then the knard. overall im happy with this tire. at 30$ cheaper, 100g lighter plus the tr casing Vee has given us a really good alternative. i still plan on trying the Chronicle when it comes out.

    also i weigh 220lb all geared up. for what its worth

  29. #79
    74 & 29 pilot
    Reputation: MTB Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,253
    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    ...

    That said, both Trax Fatty and Chronicle casings seem much improved over the paper-thin Knards.
    WEEEELLLLLLL... Not so fast. 43 miles, 24 on tame, loose trails and 19 on rocky, chunky, loose trails. Last night on the way back in riding fairly fast speed on a solid rock section, just a few loose rocks around, I tore a hole in the the casing and knob. I'm guessing that the loss of air caused the small dent in rim and pinch hole in the bead. I was running 18 PSI which had been tested for 10 miles prior to this event on REALLY chunky terrain and was no where close to bottoming the tire to rim. I was running 14.5 on the tame trails. I weigh somewhere between 205-210 lbs depending on what I'm carrying. Pretty big hole in the casing and torn knob right next to it. Stan's filled the hole, but couldn't get the bead to stop leaking. I think the rim is fine; There is no cracking, stress fracturing or de-lamination. I'm happy it was the HD version of the Derby!

    So, the Knard on the front has ridden all of the same terrain, over the same chunk, and no problems yet. Vee Rubber's Silica, SMILICA! I'm also seeing chord on the side of the casing where the seem is... I'm giving this tire a FAIL for my riding... I doesn't even measure 3 inches, even on somebody's wider rim earlier, and the casing doesn't stand up to rocky terrain. Will the 72TPI be better at withstanding cuts in the casing?

    What's your opinions about warranty action? Is it just the way things go and I'm just unlucky or is a less than 50 mile 3.0 tire with Silica suppose to handle rocky terrain?

    HURRY UP MAXXIS AND BONTRAGER!!! I need tires that were actually meant to be put on a mountain bike and not a beach cruiser!!!!!

    ALSO: Look at the last few pics to see the cornering knobs starting to disintegrate; Vee must be in business with Schwalbe







    MTBP
    "GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!"
    Turn on the truth: http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/

  30. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,614
    I destroyed a new tire on ride 3 or 5. Bummer, but putting a rock through the tread isn't a warranty issue any more than crashing and denting a frame is. I tried to save it, but in the end the damage was too severe to fix. So I bought a new tire.

    Same brand/model.

    No problems with the new one.

    Sometimes stuff just happens.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  31. #81
    74 & 29 pilot
    Reputation: MTB Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,253
    Yeah, that's what my thinking is... Just had some preconceived notion that 29+ tires would be much more durable, since with bigger tires the idea is to be able to ride any terrain. That is my last Vee Rubber tire though. My LBS found the 72 TPI through J&B, but I'm not gonna bother since it doesn't measure 3 inches anyway. Such a waist of $80!

    I ordered the 24TPI and another 120TPI in the mean time. Will the 24TPI steel bead set up tubeless on hookless bead rim?

    Can't wait for the Chronicle and the Bonti Chupacabra to come out! Guitar Ted Productions: News Season Part 4: Tires V2 Trek 2015 mountain bikes - part I - BikeRadar
    MTBP
    "GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!"
    Turn on the truth: http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/

  32. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by MTB Pilot View Post
    Just had some preconceived notion that 29+ tires would be much more durable, since with bigger tires the idea is to be able to ride any terrain.
    Since bigger tires are...well...bigger they make them thinner to keep the weight down...otherwise they'd be so burly it wouldn't be much fun to pedal.

    One incident of rock damage to one specific tire doesn't mean anything. It's totally random. Now if that happens to you 3 times in a short period of time your terrain is just too gnarly for that particular tire and your riding style.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  33. #83
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,201
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    Since bigger tires are...well...bigger they make them thinner to keep the weight down...otherwise they'd be so burly it wouldn't be much fun to pedal.
    This. Folks wouldn't want a 29 X 3.0" tire that weighed 1500 grams, but it would be a tire that would hold up to rocks and abuse much better. When the weight limits get pushed, bad things might happen. They definitely will happen more often than if the tires weighed more.

    One incident of rock damage to one specific tire doesn't mean anything. It's totally random. Now if that happens to you 3 times in a short period of time your terrain is just too gnarly for that particular tire and your riding style.
    I get why this upsets folks though. I mean, if you have three failures, that's $240.00 down the tubes! Hard to self fund that kind of research.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  34. #84
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted View Post
    I get why this upsets folks though. I mean, if you have three failures, that's $240.00 down the tubes! Hard to self fund that kind of research.
    Sure, but looking at it the other way 1 incident of anything has no meaning for analysis purposes.

    My GF got 2 or 3 flats in a 1-2 week period on her commuter bike and wanted to swap the fast/light/supple tires I put on that bike to maximize her low leg power for some heavy/stiff/slow "flat resistant" rubber. She rationalized 2-3 flats over that period meant the tires were just not up to the job and she'd be fixing flats non-stop.

    I told her even that many flats doesn't mean anything just stay the course. 2 years later and no more flats.

    Crazy thing is if she had bought the flat resistant tires she would probably also have no flats and would convince herself they were the reason and never go back to supple tires. Despite the fact that wouldn't be true.

    Lighter/supple tires are really beneficial if you are weaker or you are riding longer/harder relative to your potential. It's worth the odd puncture/problem to stick with them.

    At the very least be aware that one problem is not something you can draw any conclusions from about the tire and it's applicability to your riding needs.

    I don't like spending money replacing tires early either. Sometimes it happens though and that's just mountain biking.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  35. #85
    74 & 29 pilot
    Reputation: MTB Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,253
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    Sure, but looking at it the other way 1 incident of anything has no meaning for analysis purposes.

    ...

    I told her even that many flats doesn't mean anything just stay the course. 2 years later and no more flats.

    ...

    ...

    At the very least be aware that one problem is not something you can draw any conclusions from about the tire and it's applicability to your riding needs.

    ...
    SOOOO, which number or how many flats do you have to have for it to mean something? To you it's not 1-3; Maybe it's 4?

    Saying a hole in a tire and knob doesn't mean anything is quite naive in my opinion. There's a 50% chance that this was just unlucky and a fluke, AND a 50% chance that the casing and rubber compound on this tire just can't hold up to rugged, rocky terrain.

    I've run some tires for years that have never had flats in this terrain, let a lone a hole torn in them, and I've had others that ended in the same manner 25-60 miles in; I didn't buy those again.

    Again, its a 50/50 chance that either it was a fluke or this tire simply won't hold up in my terrain, but saying that 1 hole doesn't mean anything, is denying the FACT that this tire got a hole and tore a knob in this terrain. I'm not willing to spend another $160-200 to find out if flukes come in threes.

    The reality is that this tire punctured in rocky terrain in the first 50 miles. Do with the facts as you like, but don't deny reality.
    MTBP
    "GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!"
    Turn on the truth: http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/

  36. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by MTB Pilot View Post

    The reality is that this tire punctured in rocky terrain in the first 50 miles. Do with the facts as you like, but don't deny reality.
    I'm not denying the incident. I'm saying you are extrapolating meaning into it that is based on nothing.

    The following situations could all be true based on the one data point you have:

    - you'll never have another problem with that brand/model of tire
    - you'll have a few problems with that brand/model of tire
    - you'll have lots of problems with that brand/model of tire

    Your 50/50 number is totally made up fantasy. It's not based on anything real.

    Now as a consumer you can do whatever you want. Never buy that tire again. Never buy that brand again. It's a free world.

    Just don't tell yourself that the decision is based on a reasonable understanding of the situation.

    It's not like I am making this idea up. It's basic statistics.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  37. #87
    74 & 29 pilot
    Reputation: MTB Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,253
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    Since bigger tires are...well...bigger they make them thinner to keep the weight down...otherwise they'd be so burly it wouldn't be much fun to pedal.

    One incident of rock damage to one specific tire doesn't mean anything. It's totally random. Now if that happens to you 3 times in a short period of time your terrain is just too gnarly for that particular tire and your riding style.
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    I'm not denying the incident. I'm saying you are extrapolating meaning into it that is based on nothing.

    The following situations could all be true based on the one data point you have:

    - you'll never have another problem with that brand/model of tire
    - you'll have a few problems with that brand/model of tire
    - you'll have lots of problems with that brand/model of tire

    Your 50/50 number is totally made up fantasy. It's not based on anything real.

    Now as a consumer you can do whatever you want. Never buy that tire again. Never buy that brand again. It's a free world.

    Just don't tell yourself that the decision is based on a reasonable understanding of the situation.

    It's not like I am making this idea up. It's basic statistics.
    So your saying it's a random fluke the tire got a hole in it, or it got a hole in it because of the rocks? Wait, or both?

    How do I, the rider of this terrain in which the tire got a hole in it, not have a reasonable understanding of the situation?

    How is 50/50 fantasy; Should it be 25/25/25/25? Maybe 75/25...
    MTBP
    "GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!"
    Turn on the truth: http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/

  38. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by MTB Pilot View Post
    So your saying it's a random fluke the tire got a hole in it, or it got a hole in it because of the rocks? Wait, or both?

    How is 50/50 fantasy; Should it be 25/25/25/25? Maybe 75/25...
    That's the point. One incident on a new tire doesn't give you enough information to know what's going.

    The fantasy part is assuming you know.

    Anyways I'll stop there.

    I hope you have better luck with whatever 29+ tires you run in the future.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  39. #89
    74 & 29 pilot
    Reputation: MTB Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,253
    Your right, in that I don't have enough information, but I have plenty of experience that let's me make an educated guess. I made an assumption on the 2.25 Racing Ralph pacestar with SS when the first one, I bought two at the same time, had a hole torn in the casing between knobs, and tried the second one with the same results. I thought the first one was a fluke, but I assumed wrong. I had the same thing happen with 2 Maxxis Ardent 27.5x2.3 tires also.

    Like I said, I'm not assuming I know for sure, but I'm making an educated guess, based on my past experience that this tires casing isn't going to hold up for my style of riding, in all of the possible terrain that I ride in AZ. I'm also not willing to spend $80+ again on the same tire to find out if I'm right or wrong... right now. Who knows, I may go down the line and have bad results with all the available tires and come full circle back to the Trax.

    For now, I'll give the Knard, in both TPIs, a shot on the rear and see how it goes while I wait for the Maxxis and Bonti tires to come available.

    Thanks for your opinions, pointed debate and hopes for my luck to improve!

    Til next time...
    MTBP
    "GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!"
    Turn on the truth: http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/

  40. #90
    29er
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    859
    confirmed today
    vee trax fatty fits manitou tower pro on a stans arch ex

  41. #91
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    519
    subscribed

  42. #92
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by MTB Pilot View Post
    So, I realize these are on a 35/29mm rim, but the size of the Fatty Trax is a little disappointing compared to the Knard on the same rim. The only good thing about the smaller size is that it actually fit in the back of my Les with 2.5mm on each side! If I had a few more millimeters on each side, I'd cancel my Gnarvester; Plenty of room for the diameter of the tire. Also, the Fatty clears on the fork bridge by a few more millimeters. Both tires were measured at 30 psi on the exact same rim, right after mounted and before being ridden.
    I'm surprised we don't see a few 29 x 2.7" tires come out as there are a bunch of non-29+ frames and forks that could fit these out in the world so they's have access to a wider market than a true 3" 29+ tire.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  43. #93
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,201
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    I'm surprised we don't see a few 29 x 2.7" tires come out as there are a bunch of non-29+ frames and forks that could fit these out in the world so they's have access to a wider market than a true 3" 29+ tire.
    While that may work, this very idea is what drives the so called "B+" idea. Bigger volume, 2.8"-ish width, just slightly less diameter than a 2.3" 29"er tire, and the ability to fit a plethora of 29"er frames, (theoretically).

    The tires and rims are just getting out there and soon I will be finding out if any of this makes sense. Gotta go build some wheels now......
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  44. #94
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted View Post
    While that may work, this very idea is what drives the so called "B+" idea. Bigger volume, 2.8"-ish width, just slightly less diameter than a 2.3" 29"er tire, and the ability to fit a plethora of 29"er frames, (theoretically).

    The tires and rims are just getting out there and soon I will be finding out if any of this makes sense. Gotta go build some wheels now......
    I'm sure it will be a good solution for some people.

    The benefit with 29+ is two fold:

    1. wide low pressure tires for cush and traction

    2. very tall tires for amazing roll through the gnar

    B+ will give you #1, but won't give you benefit #2.

    If B+ means you can keep the same frame/fork that could be worth it for a bunch of people, but I do see it as not getting the full benefits of 29+. OTOH if the B+ tires are lighter maybe that will be worth it for folks having to accelerate their bikes a lot.

    I'll keep an eye out for your reviews comparing 29+ to B+.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  45. #95
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4,210
    The B+ makes the most sense to me at 3.0, 3.25, & 3.5 tire widths where the diameter can reach 29inches. The WTB tire GT is reporting on is a nice effort, but according tho his website, it's not really very wide, it's not really close to a 2.3 29inch tires diameter, and it's really not particularly light at 900 grams. Plus, we'll have to wait and see how many bikes it can actually fit with the wider rims needed to maximize the tire size.

    I'm guessing there are going to be some B+ dedicated bikes coming out in the next year, so I think it will be cool to see where the concept goes.

  46. #96
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Slow Danger View Post
    I'm guessing there are going to be some B+ dedicated bikes coming out in the next year, so I think it will be cool to see where the concept goes.
    More choices are more betterer!

    The good thing with fatbikes being popular is that the idea of a 3" tire seems totally reasonable.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  47. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4,210
    Quote Originally Posted by vikb View Post
    The good thing with fatbikes being popular is that the idea of a 3" tire seems totally reasonable.
    Certainly better than the days when XC racing dictated everything in the biz.

  48. #98
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Bigwheel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,126
    There is already a 2.9 tire full 29" diameter on the way.
    A bike by any other name is still a bike.

  49. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    251
    `So, the B+ tire would be perfect for the guy who was dissing 29ers when he got his new 27.5 bike and now wishes he had kept his mouth shut.

  50. #100
    squish, squish in da fish
    Reputation: fishwrinkle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,529
    lol, faux 29 is what a b+ should be called.

Page 2 of 22 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Tire Choices for SHEN 100
    By Dadefatsax in forum Virginia, WV, Maryland, DC, Delaware
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-13-2013, 08:59 PM
  2. The One rear tire choices
    By ikarus189 in forum Canfield
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-01-2013, 05:07 AM
  3. Tire choices
    By Saucyjack in forum Endurance XC Racing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-19-2012, 08:39 AM
  4. Geezus there are a lot of tire choices now
    By cleon in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 10-29-2011, 10:47 PM
  5. Lost in XC tire choices!!!!!
    By Rhezuss in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-27-2011, 12:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •